In article <Xns9722B01CEFEFCpettyfogery@207.115.63.158>, Backyard Mechanic wrote:
> tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>
>> In article <Xns97227BCEF891Dpettyfogery@207.115.63.158>, Backyard
>> Mechanic wrote:
>>
>>>> The pictured engine is the one I would like, a turbo inline 6.
>>
>>> How cool would that be.. to replace the Mustang 200 Sprint engine
>>> with that one!
>>
>> I would love to put one in my maverick in place of the 250... but a
>> easier solution is supposedly on the way. A company is going to make a
>> proper high performance cylinder head for the 200/250.
>
> But how long have we heard that?
This is the first I've ever heard of anyone trying and I've been
interested in these engines for about 20 years now.
> The 7 main block is a great engine, but languished way too long due to
> the silly head/manifold design
http://www.cquesttechnologies.com/fs...ead.asp?cat=64
Basically they are making a bolt on head for the US 6 cylinder engines
that encorporates a number of Aussie design features.
