Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

ยป Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

View Single Post
Old 12-09-2005, 20:01   #22 (permalink)
Spike
 
Posts: n/a
Re: My theory (so the feebs will understand)

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:55:54 -0500, Rich <none@none.com> wrote:

>I noticed a couple radicals freaked out when I suggested we leave
>the solutions to pollution problems to future generations.
>On the surface (without any critical thought) it figures the cretins
>would go nuts when they read it. But if you actually THINK about it,
>it makes perfect sense.
>In 1966 or so, some of the first pollution devices came into being on
>cars. CO2 filters. But, it wasn't until 1976 that catalytic
>converters came into being. It wasn't until then that time that any
>real progress was made on auto emissions. The converter made it
>possible to extract about 90% of the "harmful" gasses from car
>exhausts. Until that time, all other measures (EGR, CO2 cannisters,
>etc) made little difference.
>The same is true now of pollution we can't yet control. Whatever
>half-assed measure we come up with will only have a modest control
>effect. However, implementing strict controls will have a devastating
>effect on our economic systems. Because they aren't cures, like the
>catalytic converter was, but axe-like cuts, that make little headway
>in controlling emissions but do serious damage to the economy.
>In turn, this damage reduces drastically the amount of money available
>for development of real pollution controls so in the long run, wasting
>time, money and effort on modest controls may prevent us from finding
>REAL controls. Science is not cheap, and R&D gets cut when people and
>businesses suffer financially.
>So, lets stop pretending 15% cuts over 10 years will "save" the
>environment, (especially since the rapidly industrializiing Third
>World is doing F--- all to help) stop implementing WORTHLESS attempts
>at pollution control that will only hurt us in the long run but KEEP
>spending on the science needed to produce TRUE controls at a future
>date.
>-Rich

While under normal conditions, most people might conclude that if one
person holds a position and all others oppose, then the one is
probably in error. However... you'd be in august company with the
likes of Christopher Columbus.... if a number of his ships had not
fallen over the edge...
--

Spike
1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy
w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok;
Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich
gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound
audio-video...
See my ride at....
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg
Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/d..._11_05_002.jpg
Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/E...ebuild_006.jpg
  Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 16:37.

Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.