http://www.fordforums.com en Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:45:24 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.fordforums.com/images/misc/rss.jpg http://www.fordforums.com http://www.fordforums.com/f497/cam-options-168621/ Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:08:04 GMT I was wondering if anyone knew of some good proven performer cams that would be best suited for my set up. I have a 351c with 4v closed chambers heads. Car has 4.10 gears and a 4 speed toploader. Engine mods are bored .030" over with forged pistons, roller nsa rockers, aluminum water pump, torker II intake, 850 double pumper carb. the cam currently in it is a comp magnum hydraulic with 253/253 @ .050" and 585/585 lift. I also have a comp magnum solid lifter cam with 236/236 @ .050" and .575/.575 lift that i ran for a few months before going through the engine again. Im looking for what would make the most power to 7k rpm. Would i be better off switching back to the smaller solid cam? wouldnt be opposed to buying another cam if i knew it would outperform the ones i have. ]]> Cleveland Tech 95maroz28 http://www.fordforums.com/f497/cam-options-168621/ http://www.fordforums.com/f497/engine-questions-168348/ Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:07:38 GMT I have a 65' Mustang. What I am wondering is, will a 351 W or C fit in it? Or will I have to modify the front end. ]]> Cleveland Tech Dweed777 http://www.fordforums.com/f497/engine-questions-168348/ http://www.fordforums.com/f497/intake-gaskets-168316/ Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:34:51 GMT I'm having problems finding the correct intake gasket for my Edelbrock 351c-4v LB intake to 351c 2vAussie heads. Seems I can only find 4v gaskets in the high performance category and any 2v gaskets are the stock type. Will the 4v gaskets work ok?

Can anyone tell me a part number that would be applicable to my situation?

thanks

Ron ]]> Cleveland Tech fairlane351c http://www.fordforums.com/f497/intake-gaskets-168316/ http://www.fordforums.com/f497/electric-fuel-pump-recommendations-168271/ Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:23:43 GMT i recently bought a Holley "blue" 110gph @ 14 psi electric fuel pump and it came with a standard regulator that can lower it to 88gph @ 9 psi. My carb is a Holley 750 CFM double pumper #4779-S.

I am wondering if this is too powerful of a pump for this engine (which is dynod at 500), or if the lowest setting on the regulator will work just fine. if not, what should i do?

a friend of mine said i could get a bypass regulator and run a return line back to the tank, only problem is my 67's tank doesn’t have a return feed. That leads to my next question on rather to add a return to the existing tank or get a fuel cell.

any tips would be greatly appreciated. i'm trying to do this all myself and not have to pay someone a ridiculous amount to do it for me. thanks a lot. ]]> Cleveland Tech 1967Fastback http://www.fordforums.com/f497/electric-fuel-pump-recommendations-168271/ http://www.fordforums.com/f497/belt-drive-168256/ Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:34:57 GMT Has anyone used a belt drive rather than chain or gear drive? I saw a belt drive was quite pricey and wondered if it was worth it? Especially on a high end engine. What are the ups and downs of belt drive? Has anyone used a belt drive rather than chain or gear drive? I saw a belt drive was quite pricey and wondered if it was worth it? Especially on a high end engine. What are the ups and downs of belt drive? ]]> Cleveland Tech Widowmaker00 http://www.fordforums.com/f497/belt-drive-168256/ http://www.fordforums.com/f497/vacuum-modulator-port-torker-ii-intake-168206/ Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:09:08 GMT i have a 67 mustang fastback with a 71 boss 351 cleveland. on my old cleveland i had the performer rpm manifold, but my new one has a torker II and i don't know where to plug the vacuum modulator for the C6 transmission into. any ideas??? thanks. ]]> Cleveland Tech 1967Fastback http://www.fordforums.com/f497/vacuum-modulator-port-torker-ii-intake-168206/