Firestorm Gathers About Crown Vic - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Crown Victoria | Mercury Marauder | Grand Marquis | P71
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

Ford Crown Victoria | Mercury Marauder | Grand Marquis | P71 Forum for discussion of the Ford Crown Victoria, Mercury Marauder, Mercury Grand Marquis and P71.

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2002, 00:03   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rocklyn
Posts: 7,750
Firestorm Gathers About Crown Vic

FIRESTORM GATHERS ABOUT CROWN VIC
Fresh on the heels of the Firestone tire controversy, the Ford Motor Co. is
embroiled in another safety issue - this time involving police cars. The
state of Arizona has temporarily suspended its purchase of Ford Crown Victoria
police cars, pending a determination of whether the Crown Victoria is safe or
fire-prone. In addition, Arizona Governor Jane Hull has asked the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to investigate why the Crown
Victoria gas tank can explode in high-impact collisions. The NHTSA confirms it
has been quietly looking into the issue for the past eight months, or shortly
after Ford quietly sent out a service bulletin advising police departments to
pull their Crown Victorias out of service for modifications to the parking
brake and a suspension bracket. Read more on the developing story inside TCC
today:
Firestorm Grows About Crown Vic (6/23/2002)
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=5034
HSE2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-12-2002, 15:34   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5
The whole issue is mostly political.
No one official has yet discussed that in AZ (since almost every one of these incidents has been in that state alone) may be contributing to any potential problem with the way they install Police equipment in the trunk. One Story I read had the AZ spokespeople saying that equipment inside the trunk had pierced the trunk wall. nothing more has been said on that.

I've read posts by police who have claimed a half dozen tanks in new Police cars had to be replaced because their installers had run screws into the gas tank itself.
One person who perchased a used Inteceptor complained of a gas smell. He discovered that a screw from old installed eqipment had at one time pierced the fuel vapour return line.

Even after their meeting with Ford, where an agreement had been reached for Ford to test fuel bladders, AZ pushed the issue with more negative press realeases, and the TV release that was picked up by CNN and NBC. Why continue to do this when you are otherwise seemingly working mutually to a solution?

AZ has an alternative, they are supposedly ready to purchase new vehicles. There are other optons, but they still seem to want the Fords. Despite the 2003 having solved the problem of certain items potentially piercing the tank, they still cancelled orders. Why?

One gets the impression from reading what AZ has to say that the fuel tank is located under the trunk, directly behind the rear axle, and in front of the rear bumper. It isn't. It is in fact in front of the trunk, mostly above the rear axle, and probably the farthest distance forward of the rear bumper than many vehicles. the energy required to crush the rear of the vehicle that far so as to crush the tank is absolutely enormous!
Ford does rear collision testing, to a standard of 50 mph, which is higher than most manufacturers, and higher than the government requirement.
From what I have read, the collisions involving the Police vehicles have been all high impact, in excess of 75 mph, one a stated at least 100mph. These are hardly common or 'simple' rear collisions as portrayed by AZ
RCSignals is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2002, 14:23   #3 (permalink)
Black Box
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Its truly not a problem with the crown vic itself. Id expect any car to set ablaze after a 70+ mph crash to the rear end. Its not a tank. Just another excuse to go after ford, nothing more.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Crown Victoria | Mercury Marauder | Grand Marquis | P71



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford Introduces The Long Wheelbase Crown Victoria ‘centennial Edition’ In Saudi Arabi RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 8 09-05-2004 12:12
U.S. Crown Vic faces further scrutiny Stacy94PGT Ford Crown Victoria | Mercury Marauder | Grand Marquis | P71 0 06-15-2003 04:12
Challenging the Crown Victoria: Calling all cars Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 05-13-2003 07:32
2003 Ford Crown Victoria Overview RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 0 07-23-2002 07:46
the worst Crown Victoria review ever GMACK24 Ford Crown Victoria | Mercury Marauder | Grand Marquis | P71 3 12-29-2001 15:55

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:34.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.