840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowInsurance

The Pub For General Discussion

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-08-2006, 19:19   #1 (permalink)
93 2.3 MTX BOLTED OUT!
 
Cronicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my car pretty much
Age: 28
Posts: 626
840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, m.y.t. engine = 4 5.0's in but NO VALVES

THIS IS INSANE HERES THE LINK FOR YOU WHO SIMPLY CANNOT WAIT TO SEE WHAT IT IS. www.angellabsllc.com
i smell flying cars soon guys.
this thing weights 150lbs and can produce 800 foot pound sof torque at less than what your hot rod idles @.
this guy is already richer than bill gates and he hasent even sold 1 yet but the more you hear the more you know, our kids will be hooking knn's to them 1 day.

Equiv. To 32 Cylinder, 4-stroke-cycle Diesel
Bore--mm(in) 76.2(3)
Stroke--mm(in) 95.25(3.75)
Displacement-- Cu in(L) 848 (13.8)**
Aspiration Normally
Compression Ratio 25:1
Rotation (from Fly Wheel end) CCW/CW
Cooling System Oil Cooling
Lub Oil System--Quart drysump, 5
Weight, Net Dry (Approx.) Kg(lb) including flywheel . 68 (150)
Advertised hp (KW) 850(634) NA 3,000 (2,238) SC/TC.

There are no odd or brand new parts within the cylinder. All the parts are proven designs used in reciprocating engines.


The entire engine acts as a heat sink and a radiator. It is both air and oil cooled.

There is no thrust loading on piston skirts.

Pistons do not touch the cylinder walls, only the rings do.

Pistons travel only the same direction. No reciprocation, only stop and go.

There is high rpm potential for all of these reasons.

There are no cylinder heads, no cam shaft, no valves (the ME is equivalent to the bottom end of a reciprocating engine).

Intake compression and power stroke and exhaust stroke events are happening all at the same time, so there are no load strokes.

AND THE M.E. DESIGN IS NOT A ROTARY OR WANKEL

kinda gives you a gut feeling all the car companys want to know this guy.
__________________
Cronicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-12-2006, 02:01   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 378
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

man that is bizaare, dont like the air cooled though...like those vw engines.,..those things have a short life span, little fins cooling the engine.
fOrD mAn Xf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 18:33   #3 (permalink)
93 2.3 MTX BOLTED OUT!
 
Cronicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my car pretty much
Age: 28
Posts: 626
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

no doubt but they already have worked out liquid cooling bolt ons to the engine. seems they will be using transmission fluid belive it or not!!
have a look see on there forum!
__________________
Cronicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006, 19:54   #4 (permalink)
FF.com Administrator
 
Big Block Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,577
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

That looks real interesting. It does seem to be be at least a little similar to a rotary but different enough to be a new concept.

Will be interesting to follow it's progress.
__________________
Lance
71 429SCJ Mustang
Big Block Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 08:31   #5 (permalink)
Got my 3.45 LSD!
 
AU dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 214
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

wonder wats the fuel economy like? (or lack of it) with so much displacement it must use alot even and 1k rpm
__________________
AU1 Forte - 17'' AU2 Tickford rims on all corners, Super low springs,
KYB shock absorbs + camber castor kit and a 3.45 LSD.

Built with spanners, not chopsticks.
AU dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 21:05   #6 (permalink)
93 2.3 MTX BOLTED OUT!
 
Cronicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my car pretty much
Age: 28
Posts: 626
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

to deliver this power it does, it is not more efficient than a traditional engine that delivers the same torque ratings.
intresting part is the weight, size, and serious "lack of" moving parts vs modern pistion driven engines.
there main focous seems to be runing the engine extreemly lean and with bio desiel at that, not the hot rod possibilitys it could have. I mean there trying to make graphitie rings. there whole end goal seems to be 150+ mpg from a coffe can sized engine that does not feature oil based lubrication inside the cilinder. or your own personal locomative.
"they" see final compression ratios of greater than 100:1 for the 14'' model
__________________
Cronicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 02:46   #7 (permalink)
FF.com Administrator
 
Big Block Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,577
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

Wow 100:1 is serious compression.
__________________
Lance
71 429SCJ Mustang
Big Block Ford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 20:06   #8 (permalink)
93 2.3 MTX BOLTED OUT!
 
Cronicus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in my car pretty much
Age: 28
Posts: 626
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

its all in thier forums
__________________
Cronicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2006, 05:10   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
RAVEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,562
Re: 840 lbs torque @ less than 1k rpm, myt engine = 4 5.0's in displacment but NO VALVES

nice.
__________________
240rwkw slug.
RAVEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.