just a little thing on the speed enforcement - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
The Pub For General Discussion

View Poll Results: what do you think is the main contributing factor to most road acceindent??
speed? 1 1.04%
driver experience? 45 46.88%
condition of the road? 6 6.25%
all of the above? 44 45.83%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:26 AM Thread Starter
gm dstroya's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: gold coast and off playing with 32psi of boost pumping into 4.1lt of pure ohc feralness and developing a 350hp n/a kit for ea-au i6, also making 5.0lt gear soon enuf
Posts: 1,043
just a little thing on the speed enforcement

this is the editor of carpoint magazine thoughts on the hole advertiseing that the governments use on speeding...

The latest round of shock tactic television advertisements from the Victorian Transport Accident Commission is nothing but a blatant slap in the face to all Australians. How thick do they think we, the public, are?

Mindless lemmings without sufficient brain power to think for ourselves, obviously, judging from the thinly disguised propaganda they're dishing up to us... The most sickening -- and disheartening -- aspect of the campaign is we're swallowing it whole.

In case you're not familiar with the advertisement in question, it's a victim's view of a road crash that left her in a coma and fighting for her life. Rachel Roberts tells us her boyfriend was driving at 5km/h over the speed limit. The suitably authoritative voice-over suggests that, had he been sticking to the speed limit, the crash and this lady's trauma which continues today, may not have happened.

Let's look more closely at the circumstances surrounding the event. Let's go beyond what the TAC is prepared to disclose in order to get its "Wipe-off five" message across, and look at the facts they chose to withhold. Rachel Roberts' wrote an account of the crash for the Teenagers' Road Accident Group (www.trag-vic.org) website, and it's very revealing.

Firstly, the road is the Ringwood-Warrandyte road in outer Melbourne; a typical outer suburban road; narrow, badly surfaced and with no gutters - just mud on the verge. The road on the TV ad is inner suburban; smooth, good gutters, footpaths, the best a man can build.

Second, the real car is a 1978 Ford Escort four-door. Nothing wrong with that. The average Australian car is 10.1 years old, according to the government's own data. The car in the advertisement is a 1993 Ford Laser, which the TAC says it chose "for its similar size and safety features". Ford must be happy to hear its small car safety went nowehere in 15 years.

Third, Ms Roberts' own words say it was raining at the time of the crash. No rain on the TV version. Interestingly no rain on the police crash report, either. Though the photos of the crash clearly show a wet road.

Fourth, Ms Roberts' own words say the tyres on her boyfriends Escort were bald. Her father and her future brother in-law had been telling the driver to "get new tyres on his car". Again, no mention of bald tyres in the ad, and no bald tyres noted in the police report.

Fifth, the driver was on his P plates, and in Ms Roberts' own words "he was inexperienced".

The vehicle's speed, which is the crux of the advertisement, was deemed to be 5km/h over the limit. By who? Witnesses, that's who. How accurately can you judge a car's speed? Try it sometime, and discover how widely your estimate can vary based on the proximity of roadside objects.

There is no doubt that Ms Roberts is the victim of a tragic set of events. There is also no doubt that these events can be avoided. But is wiping 5km/h off a vehicle's speed the answer?

Would tyres with tread have performed better than the car's bald tyres? Would a more experienced driver have read the situation better? Would a better maintained road, without muddy verges and without trees right alongside have resulted in a different outcome?

The most alarming question to come out of this commercial is the abysmal level of intelligence the Victorian TAC attributes to the average driver. Is everything we see on television God's honest truth?

The TAC pursues its 'speed kills' campaign for one reason and - shock horror - it's not the safety of road users. It is to legitimize its use of speed cameras to raise revenue. How else does a government department meet a traffic infringement budget forecast of $392million? That's up $101 million on the previous year.

Want to know how ludicrous this situation is? If more money is expected to be made, then more people are expected to speed. If the government itself predicts more speeding drivers, then clearly people aren't slowing down. If people aren't slowing down, then the road safety campaign is not working!

Or is speeding not the real cause of crashes?

Glenn Butler
Editor, CarPoint Australia


live in S.E. queensland? bit of a revhead? click here!!--> speedphreaks

1000hp is underway. rods,pistons here!! t88 on its way!!
gm dstroya is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:31 AM Thread Starter
gm dstroya's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: gold coast and off playing with 32psi of boost pumping into 4.1lt of pure ohc feralness and developing a 350hp n/a kit for ea-au i6, also making 5.0lt gear soon enuf
Posts: 1,043
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

also you can veiw the real story as told by
the lady involved in the acceident

take this link to veiw...


also this link has the above mention article as well as some other interesting reads...

live in S.E. queensland? bit of a revhead? click here!!--> speedphreaks

1000hp is underway. rods,pistons here!! t88 on its way!!

Last edited by gm dstroya; 07-30-03 at 05:34 AM.
gm dstroya is offline  
post #3 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:43 AM
laminge's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,402
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

I would have to say driver awareness is prob the biggest thing
laminge is offline  
post #4 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:57 AM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Qld
Age: 68
Posts: 502
I was once asked a question by a QC in The Federal Court in Darwin,this was during my 90mins in the box giving evidence. The question was"Mr McMaster can you tell the court how fast the Masseratti was going when it was approaching your checkpoint, my answer "no sir it's almost impossible to estimate a vehicles speed when your standing on the roadside"
This was a result of the accident that killed the Canonball Run.

John McMaster is offline  
post #5 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 03:58 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 50
Posts: 341
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

Driver attittude is the biggest factor.
Doesn't matter what skills you have or what speed you travel if your attitued sucks, so does your driving.
cs123 is offline  
post #6 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 04:50 PM
AKA: Spaniard
VH-PBC's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Western Suburbs, Melb., VIC
Age: 32
Posts: 848
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

I believe it's a combination of factors, not necessarily 1 factor. Speed is not solely to blame for anything, as is driver error, road conditions individually.

Speed is the only thing that the govt. can get money from. Driver error, they have to pay to bring people up to scratch in driver education & road conditions is definately going to come out of their money bag. All this leaves speed as the scapegoat.

No car ATM but I am looking at one...
I don't want to say which one otherwise someone else might buy it!
VH-PBC is offline  
post #7 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:00 PM
Whats traction?
xdc351's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Smokin melb's eastern suburbs
Age: 35
Posts: 2,197
Knowing the road all to well you can rest assured if anyone was stupid enough to drive along there at the speed limit, in the wet, with bald tyers they will crash. Simple as that. I personally doubt with bald tyers and an old esky he would have even been able to get enough momentum up to do 75 through there.

The road is extremely slippery and 70 most of the way along, except the near bendless residential part which is 60, and my XF with brand new tyres and me being very timid with the throttle will loose traction on the bends at 60 in the wet. If I gave it a bootfull i'd be straight off the road.

There is a couple of corners (and i'm sure one of them is where the accident happened) where I have to slow down to about 45kmh or it'll step out on me with no throttle through the corner. I must point out that aside from being a bit rough the road is fine when its dry.

If the government was serious about saftey they would be spending the speeding fine revenues on road improvements. But they don't, they spend it on the f*cking commonwealth games and other crap that nobody cares about like federation square. Intead choosing to put tolls on freeways (which they promised not to in their election campain) and more cameras in order to make more money.


Just like a Tsunami.

Last edited by xdc351; 07-30-03 at 05:31 PM.
xdc351 is offline  
post #8 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 05:33 PM
Pursuit Reincarnation Dog
Aussie Pete's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 7,777
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

I ahve an answer to the dilemma posed near the end of the first post.

They need more speeding drivers to meet budget forecasts for revenue. Yet more people get caught so they must not be slowing down?

Well, let me use the RTA in NSW as an example of how to sort this out.

1. Stoney Creek Road Bexley-Beverley Hills; this used to be a 70 zone with very high volumes of trucks and very busy all the time regardless. Now, after building the M5 East and the traffic volumes dropping considerably they have changed it to a 60 zone. Police patrol this stretch ruthlessly with a fave spot being a little downhill section over a crest where LIDAR rakes in a fortune.

2. General Holmes Drive; again after building the M5 east and improving this road greatly they chgange it from a 90 zone to a variable zone which is normally 70. They also conveniently install two speed cameras.

3. Princes Hwy Kogarah; despite all the pedestrian furniture such as fences, traffic lights and an overpass this 60 zone is turned into a school zone and two speed cameras are installed.

And so on.

So, to keep up revenue, just keep lowering the speed limits.

BA'1.5' Pursuit 290
Lightning Strike / Reflective Orange Stripes

'General' Dog - AP's German Shepherd and Best Mate - 02Dec1998-15Dec2003.
'Pepper' Dog - General's and My Little German Shepherd Sweetie - 1996?-02Apr2006.

'Sako' Dog - My Beautiful and Pretty German Shepherd - 2001?-23Aug2006.
Aussie Pete is offline  
post #9 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-30-03, 06:10 PM
a little bit sideways
rsgerry's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: in a ditch
Posts: 1,258
accidents occur for a number of reasons. speed is used as a major cause because it is convenient, it is hard to disprove and it justifies the misuse of speed cameras.

driver experience needs to be considered. someone who knows their car, the road, conditions and the way to read the road is safer behind the wheel than someone who cannot see beyond the end of the bonnet. the latter case is dangerous at any speed. to me, experience is everything. you know when to slow down, when it is safe to speed up, what your own car is capable of etc.

You wash your car like it was your firstborn child, you tend to its needs like it was your own body, you protect it like it's your family, then you drive it like you stole it.

Weapons of rice destruction

2002 Ford Falcon AU3 XR6
1985 Ford Sierra XR4i
1980 Ford Escort RS2000
rsgerry is offline  
post #10 of 32 (permalink) Old 07-31-03, 12:04 AM
FPV Tasmania Member
TS50's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tasmania
Age: 58
Posts: 961
Re: just a little thing on the speed enforcement

options in the poll too hard to say, there are so many contributing factors
Driver inatention
Lack of ability
Roadworthiness of car
so I chose all of the above, however I dont believe speed to be a huge factor. Having said that, inapropriate speed is a major factor, have to drive to suit the conditions and area.

2002 Narooma Blue Manual TS50
TS50 is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Year was 1976 .... russellw The Pub 21 03-15-03 10:13 AM
NRMA Have Become Puppets of the NSW Revenue Chasing Government Aussie Pete The Pub 26 01-23-03 03:52 PM
Speed camera message getting through? Falchoon The Pub 1 04-29-02 10:21 PM
PLEASE READ - Speed cameras VIC - new 3km over policy Carmine The Pub 12 03-27-02 10:33 PM
How 55 speed cameras make $116,000 each day from fines Falchoon The Pub 8 01-21-02 05:52 AM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome