Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
The Pub For General Discussion

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-15-03, 04:34 AM Thread Starter
Subaru Liberty RS Turbo
MMTX5's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 43
Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

Pity the Government won't listen to this bloke anyway


Most speed cameras should be removed as they do little more than earn revenue for state governments, a British sociologist said.

In his report, Speed Traps: Saving Lives or Raising Revenue, Bath Spa University sociologist Alan Buckingham said the rate of decline in road fatalities has slowed since speed cameras were introduced across Australia.

"The whole point of speed cameras was to increase the rate of reduction in the number of serious and fatal accidents, but the data shows the reverse," Dr Buckingham said.

Speed was not a major factor in road fatalities, he added.

"The statistics used by Australian and British governments which show speeding is involved in 30 per cent of road accidents is flawed, for they include factors such as fatigue and alcohol," Dr Buckingham said.

"The British Transport Research Laboratory finds that just 7.3 per cent of accidents were caused primarily by excessive speed."

Those who speed moderately - 10-20 kph above the posted limit - were less likely to have an accident than those who travelled well above and below the limit, the report stated.

"The law bears down heavily on the safest drivers," Dr Buckingham said.

"Millions of motorists are being convicted each year for a driving behaviour that is perfectly safe."

Road safety policy should shift from "the obsessive pursuit of speeders" and return to fostering conscientious driving, he added.

"Most speed cameras should be removed," Mr Buckingham said.

He will present his report at a lecture in Sydney, hosted by the Centre for Independent Studies.

Last edited by MMTX5; 10-15-03 at 04:42 AM.
MMTX5 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-15-03, 04:37 AM
Registered User
EFFalcon's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Age: 33
Posts: 7,517
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

more proof of where our hard earned dollars are going.

1995 EF II Falcon GLi: Heritage Green, 4spd Auto, AUII 17" Rims, Custom BA Front Bar, Lowered, Gas Research LPG, Clear Indicators, JVC MP3 Headunit, Phoenix Gold 6.5" Splits, Coustic 481QE Amp, Clarion 12" sub, Leather Seats, Power Window Conversion, 3.45 LSD, Pacemaker Comp Extractors, 2.5" Exhaust, Mandrel Bent Intake, High Flow Filter, Wade 1004 110 cam.

In Progress: BA XR Side Skirts, BA XR Rear bar, BA Shifter Handle.

Want your EF on effalcon.com? Drop me a PM!
E-Series Club Stickers Here!

E-Series Moderator/Membership Officer/Webmaster/Cruise Official
EFFalcon is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-15-03, 05:05 PM
Pursuit Reincarnation Dog
Aussie Pete's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Melbourne VIC
Posts: 7,777
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

Focus on speed blurs a fatal truth
October 16, 2003

Sydney Morning Herald

There's a misguided reliance on deterrence by camera instead of making the highways safer, writes Miranda Devine.

There have been so many fatal accidents on the Pacific Highway near Neil Saines's home in Ballina in the past year that he has taken to keeping a record on a piece of paper near his phone. The sounds of ambulance and fire-engine sirens send a chill up his spine, and he says they have become increasingly common in the 13 years he has lived in the pretty town an hour from the Queensland border.

These are his notes for one month: on July 4 a 23-year-old man killed in a single-car crash; July 6, three teenagers were killed in a head-on collision with a semi-trailer; July 7, a 17-year-old girl was killed in a head-on; July 23, five cars were incinerated after a head-on, killing two people and seriously injuring six.

Ballina sits in the middle of one of the most dangerous stretches of highway in NSW. The Pacific Highway, the main route between Sydney and Brisbane, is a two-lane Third-World goat track for much of this northern section, despite promises of a 12-kilometre bypass around Ballina and seven years into a 10-year $2.8 million federal-state upgrade.



This excuse for a highway runs on a meandering route through the centre of Ballina, taking drivers from one end of town to the other, and back again, in a big U-turn that requires you to negotiate five roundabouts and a little two-lane wooden bridge.

The strain of ever-growing traffic volumes became much worse last August when the road was opened to the extra-long B-double trucks, which are deserting the federally-funded inland New England Highway for the shorter coastal route. Saines, aged 66 and vice-president of the Ballina Bypass Action Group (BBAG), says an extra 2000 vehicles rumble through Ballina every day, mostly big trucks.

As a result, the town's roundabouts are battered, their retaining walls smashed, their little gardens overrun as truck drivers valiantly try to manoeuvre 25-metre-long, nine-axle vehicles into right-hand turns. The power pole alongside one roundabout has had "half the side scraped off".

Saines says the NSW Government has been promising a bypass by 1998, then 2004, then 2006, then 2010. Now BBAG has been told there is no set completion date because of what the Roads and Traffic Authority says are "engineering and environmental challenges" on the surrounding wetlands. With funding to expire in 2006, the RTA is saying the project needs federal funding to be completed, despite the fact it is a state highway.

Despite the reluctance to spend money on roads to make them safe, there is no such foot-dragging from the State Government when it comes to ripping revenue out of motorists in the name of safety.

The NSW Roads Minister, Carl Scully, dumped as transport minister after wasting a reported $385 million on lemons such as the Millennium train and the near-empty Liverpool-Parramatta bus transitway, has turned his sights to speed cameras as a cure-all. NSW already has 110 fixed speed cameras, which rake in more than $40 million a year. Now Scully wants 20 per cent more, claiming research by ARRB Transport Research proves conclusively they save lives.

But in an article in this month's Policy magazine (www.cis.org.au), a British sociologist, Alan Buckingham, says the opposite, citing research which shows speed cameras do nothing to reduce accidents, and may cause them. His research predictably caused howls of outrage yesterday, with the RTA describing it as "seriously flawed" and saying road deaths had been reduced significantly at 28 speed camera sites.

But Buckingham says governments in Britain and NSW lump together accidents and label them "speed-related". The RTA says 30 per cent of fatal accidents involve speed. Yet Buckingham found they had included in the definition such causes as "trucks jack-knifing", "fatigue" and alcohol". As he points out, any accident can be labelled speed-related since "objects cannot collide if they are not moving".

It is "excessive speed for the conditions" which Buckingham says is dangerous. He says it is those drivers who travel at well above or well below the limit who are dangerous. The safest drivers are those who travel at the 85th percentile of the traffic's prevailing speed on any given road, which may be over the speed limit. He concludes speed cameras therefore are catching the safest drivers but not the most dangerous slowpokes.

In Canada, the Government of British Columbia scrapped speed cameras when they found they had had "no discernible impact on speed or the fatal accident rate".

The data for the efficacy of speed cameras in NSW is not encouraging. Fatal crashes in NSW halved between 1980 and 1991, which is when speed cameras were introduced, writes Buckingham. "Since then, the decline has faltered with a drop of just 3 per cent since 1993, despite the implementation of double demerit points in 1997 and fixed speed cameras in 1999." The double-demerit scheme which operates over Christmas and other holiday periods is shown by Buckingham to have had "no effect" on road fatalities. Speed cameras may even cause accidents because journey times are increased, causing drivers to become frustrated; drivers may divert to less safe routes to avoid cameras; and cameras can distract driver attention, and cause sudden braking.

The danger of increased reliance by government on speed cameras, says Buckingham, is that "by regularly convicting large numbers of law-abiding people [and] alienating those on whose goodwill the police often rely ... respect for the law will lessen."

Speed cameras also let governments off the hook on safety. They can blame motorists for driving too fast instead of building proper dual carriageways that allow margin for inevitable human error. People will always make mistakes but a moment's inattention or miscalculation shouldn't be fatal.

Monday is the anniversary of the Grafton bus crash, in which 20 people died in a head-on collision between a coach and a semi-trailer on the Pacific Highway.

Fourteen years later, the road is still killing people. Just last Sunday, retired couple Bernard and Maureen Mellare died in a three-car head-on crash eight kilometres north of Taree, on a section of the Pacific Highway that is being upgraded and where the speed limit is just 80kmh.


BA'1.5' Pursuit 290
Lightning Strike / Reflective Orange Stripes

'General' Dog - AP's German Shepherd and Best Mate - 02Dec1998-15Dec2003.
'Pepper' Dog - General's and My Little German Shepherd Sweetie - 1996?-02Apr2006.

'Sako' Dog - My Beautiful and Pretty German Shepherd - 2001?-23Aug2006.
Aussie Pete is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-22-03, 04:24 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 23
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

"Pity the Government won't listen to this bloke anyway"

Never! They make too much money. They'll try to convince that speed cameras are saving lives even if it kills us.
jb1 is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-22-03, 05:13 AM
Registered User
davocol's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne
Age: 35
Posts: 765
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

Excellent read!

Now the proud owner of an AU xr8 220... OHHH YeAh
davocol is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-03, 03:45 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 23
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

The motorists association have been getting quite a lot of exposure in the media in recent times supporting the first independent research. All other recent research has been GovCo commissioned.

The motorists association website is:

jb1 is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 10-23-03, 04:08 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 31
Posts: 46
Re: Speed cameras don't stop crashes: report

From todays Herald Sun

Police ashamed of speed camera policy
Peter Mickelburough
state politics reporter

POLICE have broken ranks with the Bracks Government over speed cameras, claiming they are being used as blatant revenue raisers.

Sergeants at a Melbourne police station say there is widespread concern within the force over speed cameras, singling out the West Gate Bridge.
"The public are not alone in their views; the rank and file of the police force are ashamed at the recent tactics of reducing the road toll (or increasing revenue)," says a letter to the Herald Sun, signed by "Concerned Sergeants".

"Speed cameras have an effective and supported purpose of reducing road trauma, but their purpose is lost when they are implemented and placed for revenue purposes (ie. West Gate Bridge)," the letter says.

The officers say support for the cameras has waned since the 10 per cent speed tolerance was cut last year.

The letter argues hefty fines issued to people doing just a few km/h above the limit will hurt many families and could force some into crime to pay them.

It predicts an explosion in motorists losing their licences as new cameras appear on the West Gate Bridge, Geelong Rd and Hume Highway.

Already, some 90,000 drivers are one offence away from licence loss.

"If so many motorists are getting fined on a particular stretch of road, is the speed limit or signage inappropriate for the road?" the letter asks.

Police Association secretary Sen-Sgt Paul Mullett said the association backed most of the letter's sentiments.

"We don't want to see cameras placed just for revenue raising. They should be placed in accident black spots," he said.

But Assistant Commissioner (traffic) Bob Hastings said most police supported the use of speed cameras.

"This idea that speeding a little bit is all right is not right, because we know through research that for every 5km/h over 60km/h your rate of being involved in a collision doubles," he said.
Dra is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Year was 1976 .... russellw The Pub 21 03-15-03 10:13 AM
NRMA Have Become Puppets of the NSW Revenue Chasing Government Aussie Pete The Pub 26 01-23-03 03:52 PM
PLEASE READ - Speed cameras VIC - new 3km over policy Carmine The Pub 12 03-27-02 10:33 PM
How 55 speed cameras make $116,000 each day from fines Falchoon The Pub 8 01-21-02 05:52 AM
Speed and Red light cameras Falchoon The Pub 4 01-18-02 01:14 AM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome