Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read

The Pub For General Discussion


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

ยป Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2002, 01:13   #21 (permalink)
Registered User
 
snavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: mebourne
Posts: 1,967
hey at least 338 is more than what they have in their six right now :)
snavy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-10-2002, 04:17   #22 (permalink)
****in Flat Out Racing
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sittin' on my arse
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally posted by Ken Oath


What have you guys been smokeing? The I6 is a new engine, and all Ford have to do is turn the wick up a little bit. The power is there for the taking.

We don't need a V6, and we DON'T want a V6!!!
I would'nt go as far as saying the BA donk is new. Heavily revised is more apt. Sure, the power is there (and plenty of room for future increases) but fuel consumption is a major worry.

But yeah, the I6 in it's latest guise is not too shabby.
FFOracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 04:33   #23 (permalink)
Veteran revhead
 
Road Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Where the action is
Posts: 413
GM have known that the Buick Ecocrud is past it's use by date for a while. It is just a matter of time, money and resources to design, build and implement it's replacement, just like Ford have done with thie I6 now.

Reading between the lines, Ford would not have thrown so much $$ and engineering R&D into a motor that was only going to have a lifespan of 3-4 years. It's their staple engine, and will more than likely be in the model lineup for at least 8 years.
__________________
There are only 2 states to be in:
Western Australia, and pissed.
Road Warrior is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 04:44   #24 (permalink)
****in Flat Out Racing
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sittin' on my arse
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally posted by Road Warrior
Reading between the lines, Ford would not have thrown so much $$ and engineering R&D into a motor that was only going to have a lifespan of 3-4 years. It's their staple engine, and will more than likely be in the model lineup for at least 8 years.
Yes I have to agree. Ford would not have spent the bucks on overhauling the engine and grafting on a hairdryer if it were only for a coupla years...

But I am very surprised (dissapointed?) that fuel economy has not improved. Something that the Falcon consistantly cops flak for time and time again. I think that fact alone might cost BA COTY. All other cars are imnproving efficiency, yet Falcon doesnt.
FFOracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 05:50   #25 (permalink)
2nd car....XR6turbo
 
XR6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Victoria Australia
Posts: 694
U have to remember, that the other cars don't have the weight and the power output to even get close to the barra. The motor is probably the best 6 to come out in Australia, and i think its time to give credit to ford in not increasing the fuel economy even thought the power and weight is there. Ford have done a remarkable job, and its time to start looking at the whole package not focusing on little things. If u take the whole package into the equation, then u see ford is in front.
__________________
Losing my license wasn't the smartest thing i have ever done, but now i can save my ass off and buy a V8!!
XR6turbo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 15:28   #26 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The drivers seat
Posts: 261
I believe that the new I6 is actually more fuel efficient but because of the extra weight of the BA it has the same official economy. Once the BA starts loosing some weight you will see an improvement in the fuel economy.
__________________
The reason few people are agreeable in conversation is that each is thinking more about what he intends to say than what the others are saying and we never listen when we are eager to speak.

Ford Focus: The car that flies :s6:
Driver is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 17:47   #27 (permalink)
Formerly lowercase :-)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In an enlightened state of mind
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally posted by snavy
i think holden is getting a major strip down of that engine, becuse of cost.
Holden will be manufacturing the engine themselves. The turbo variations are supposed tp be for SAAB but I am not sure if Holden will put a turbo version in the next Commodore.
MintEAFalcon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 20:38   #28 (permalink)
400 kg ego
 
Troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,189
Quote:
Originally posted by FFOracing
But I am very surprised (dissapointed?) that fuel economy has not improved. Something that the Falcon consistantly cops flak for time and time again. I think that fact alone might cost BA COTY. All other cars are imnproving efficiency, yet Falcon doesnt.
This is a very good point. Back in '94, the EF had everything it needed to win COTY - except fuel consumption and handling were let-downs. Now we have BA which is a major update that has done nothing to address a traditional Falcon weakness. With so much competition from the imports these days, it would be sad to see Falcon not win due to poor "utilisation of resources".
__________________
Jack Travis, E-Series Acting President

1989 Ford Fairmont Ghia turbo/GL replica (underway)
1994 Eunos 800M
1990 Ford Laser S
Troutman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 00:59   #29 (permalink)
****in Flat Out Racing
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sittin' on my arse
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally posted by minteafalcon


Holden will be manufacturing the engine themselves. The turbo variations are supposed tp be for SAAB but I am not sure if Holden will put a turbo version in the next Commodore.
All I hope is that Ford remain on the ball. Don't write Holden off, they will be back bigger and better with the next gen Commonbore, and take it right up to Ford.

Personally, I am a little worried about HFV6. A damn fine engine with plenty of go fast options.
FFOracing is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > The Pub



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25.

Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0