xr8 5.0

has any one had experence with both off these. Iam just wondering what the pros and cons are for both systems as iam looking to buy one. I am getting sick of swapping computors when i take my car to the drags. Here is the run down, with the std. EEC iv, catch code 3DEA ,the car drives good and gets good economy and makes 297hp @ the wheels ,but has 14.2 A/Fuel and 5700rpm rev limit, with a mustang A9M EEC the air/con wont work and idle quality sucks but at WOT on the dyno it rockes 13.2A/fuels 315hp at 5900rpm

EDXR8

The tweecer has a fairly easy to use interface which makes it much easier to use compared with the EEC Tuner IMO. Both do the same however I am not sure if there is support for aussie EEC's with the EEC Tuner, tweecer does have aussie support but its not great. The 3DEA is not supported I believe but it may be similar to the 3DFA, you will have to check and see.

anakha

Consensus these days is go with the tweecer. It is the product with the best continuing support which counts for a lot. You also have the ability to switch between multiple tunes with a switch as well as the option of a pricier model with real time tuning capability.

That said I currently own an EEC-Tuner which I bought a few years back and I would not switch to a tweecer with the monetary investment I already made.

If you already have an A3M you could go with either as both support it.

You my also want to have a word with Peter Bysterveld. He is an official supplier of both products and would likely have more practical experience than anyone in Australia with them, especially with respect to support for Australian processors.

His site is here

No personal involvement with his business but we did share plenty of information a few years back before he went pro.

xr8 5.0

thanks for your comments i will contact Peter and have a talk to him