GTA or not? - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Mustang Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

Ford Mustang Forum This forum is for the discussion of all Ford Mustang models, including the Ford Mustang, Ford Mustang Convertible and Ford Mustang Coupe and all older/classic models and submodels.

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2002, 10:24   #1 (permalink)
Vintage Mustang Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Age: 28
Posts: 26
GTA or not?

I took my car to a mechanic to make sure everything is safe and running well. He did some work and now everything is perfect engine/drivetrain wise. He also said that my car does infact have a 289 hipo engine. I put up a post asking about K-code and non K-code cars and engines. I had asked if I could have a non K-code hipo 289. I now know that it is a hipo but that it was switched out for the original 289 2v. Now that I know one of the previous owners knew enough about cars and engines to have this one put in, im worried that my car isnt a true GTA. I have no paperwork but everything is correct to make it a GTA (as far as i know) but its not that difficult to make it one. It has the dual exhaust and has the rear valance cut outs. It has the fog lights and the normal switches for them. it does not however, have front or rear disc brakes. I thought I heard somewhere that the GT package included disc brakes so hopefully im wrong. How can I tell for sure? Thanks again for all your help!
baseball4lf8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-01-2002, 16:44   #2 (permalink)
F-150 Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Age: 67
Posts: 141
What year is the car?? Can you give the vin #?? I'll check my resources.
__________________
Dave
2005 F150 SuperCrew "King Ranch"
2004 Thunderbird
1997 Ranger
1986 LTD II
1968 Cougar
1964 Corvair Monza
Gearhead99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2002, 20:17   #3 (permalink)
PT Owner - SCPOC Prez
 
dmark101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 681
Thumbs up

there was a site that you could use to decode the car's data plate. it's very accurate.

go to www.mustangdecoder.com and find out exactly what your car came with! :s5
__________________
dæmon™
dmark101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 06:20   #4 (permalink)
Saleen Member
 
bigblockgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 69
Posts: 22
If you don't have the answer, maybe this will help. The GT Equipment Group ( $205 option), includes, fog lights, power assisted front disc-rear drum brakes, racing stipes on each side, GT or GTA badging, F70X14 WO WSW tires, heavy duty suspension. With the 390 or 298 Hi=Po, a low restrictions dual exhaust with brite-plated "quad" exhaust was included.
The package could be opted for with ANY V8. Also, check our clubs website Falls City Mustang Club for a vin decoder.
__________________
Charlie
Member Falls City Mustang Club
<img src="http://www.fallscitymustangclub.com/images/charlie_indy.jpg"width=100> <img src="http://www.fallscitymustangclub.com/images/charlie67.jpg"width=100>
bigblockgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 16:24   #5 (permalink)
Multi Car Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 36
Sorry, your car isn't a real GT or GTA if it came with a 2V, it must be 289 4V or 289 hipo or 390 4V. Also, all GT's or GTA's have front discs. Don't sweat it though, with that motor, your car is better than a GT or GTA with a regular 4V 289 or even a 390. The hipo 289 is a great motor, but the 390 is the poorest size to power ratio Ford motor of the musclecar era. 396(402) Camaros could leave 390 Mustangs standing still, that's why the great 68 428 Cobra Jet Mustang debuted.
tyrantX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2002, 21:31   #6 (permalink)
cougar/bulletbird member
 
hawkrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: monterey bay, california
Posts: 74
sorry but i have to correct this bit of misinformation. a gt or gta could be a 2 barrel c code car. the gta was a 67 only option so i am assuming that we are talking 67 car and starting 67 2 barrels were fair game on gt package cars. also disc brakes were an included option that could be deleted even on 65 and 66 cars (drag racers don't like them and since it was a newer technology at the time not everybody was enamored of them). i am also still curious how the mechanic could tell it was a hi-po? did he pull the oil pan off? did he pull the valve covers? if he did not take of the oil pan he could not possibly know if it was a hi-po as the blocks did not have a special number or anything you could use to identify them. the heads can be identified if the exhaust manifold is off or if you use a mirror as they usually have a 4v cast on the lower part of the head where the short head bolts go. otherwise if you take off the valve cover you can see the spring pockets for the valves. hawkrod
__________________
Hawkrod

39 Ford Deluxe Coupe
59 Tbird 430
(2)62 Tbirds
(3)68 Cougar XR7-G's
69 Cougar 428CJ 4 speed
77 1/2 Ford F250 4X4 w/460 swap
86 SVO mustang

<font size=4><a href="http://www.superford.org/registry/profile.php?user=2829"> look at my cars past and present at superford! </A></Font>
hawkrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2002, 12:27   #7 (permalink)
Vintage Mustang Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Age: 28
Posts: 26
This is about hawkrod's reply to the hipo part. The mechanic I went to isnt a mustang specialist. If I really wanted to know if its a hipo then i would take it to one, but it isnt that big of a deal to me but i would like to know. Just not to have to take it to a specialist to find out. The mechanic said the bottom end or something on the bottom end was way too big to not be a hipo or it would shake the car to pieces. He was pointing to what it looked to be the crank pully or somewhere around there. I dont know how he would be able to tell by loking at it but when he looked at it he said it wasnt just an engine dress up kit. When we went to pick up the car he said a few people had looked at it and said it had a rare spyder intake. I had never heard of a spyder intake on any car, is there such a thing and if so, what is it and why is it rare? The mechanic also said it has the original dual point distributor. I could have sworn that the guy i bought the car from said he put a new distrib on, but maybe i heard wrong. He (the guy i bought it from) might have said new cap and wires. The mechanic didnt pull the valve covers or the oil pan so i dont know how he would know but he said it is definately a hipo engine. He also said that its not the orig engine which would support the fact that it is a hipo. He said some connecting thing is different from the original so its not the original engine. I dont know a whole lot about cars and engines but i know more than the average joe. I know that the main bearing caps were larger on the hipo and thats the main way to find out if its a hipo but i dont have the resources to drop the pan. it has a windage tray on it and i read in one of my books that a hipo has the threads on the cap bolts to support this but maybe you could put one on any engine. I dont know. The mechanic isnt a mustang specialist but he builds hot rods for a living so hes not just some napa auto parts mechanic. The vin # is 7t01c27159 65a 2a 200 227627. The car is a 67. If anyone could find out as much as possible about my car it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
baseball4lf8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2002, 13:27   #8 (permalink)
cougar/bulletbird member
 
hawkrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: monterey bay, california
Posts: 74
hi, your mechanic was probably pointing at the harmonic balancer behind the pulley as the hipo ones are much larger. unfortunately this is an easy swap and a good performance modification on any stock motor as the balance (despite what your mechanic says) is the same and the bigger balancer helps smooth out vibration and extend the life of the crankshaft and bearings. i have bought several of these off of otherwise stock engines as they are totaly interchangeable with the stock balancer as long as the correct style pulley is used (67 and older pulleys are usually correct but 68 and newer pulleys are larger and won't fit which is why the over the counter hipo balancer is a little different than the early ones!). as a side note the 68 and 69 balancer for the 289 302 are also larger and many people who are not familiar with the hipo unit think they have one but of course that is usually not the case. i am not sure what he is refering to as a spider intake as of course the hipo used the stock standard cast iron unit. also the stock hipo did not have a windage tray or anything to attach one. it was not until 69 when the boss 302 came out that ford had a windage tray in the stock small block. the dual point distributor was of course a hipo part but is still available from ford today as it is a popular swap item. to tell if it is an original one you need to look at the casting as it will say autolite not motorcraft and will have a 64-67 date code (if it was made from 68-71 it will still say autolite but will have the wrong date). also look to see if the casting has a spot for a vacuum advance. the originals didn't but many replacements do. the hole will either not be drilled through the housing or it can have a plate screwed over the hole. if it has a vacuum advance it is not a hipo. unfortunately it is very easy to put all of the correct exterior items on an original engine and it is impossible to tell without ripping into it. and even more unfortunately this swapping of parts is extremely common and not at all unusual. i am curious how the mechanic was able to tell that this was not the original engine as the only way to tell would be to check casting numbers and date codes. so if he is not a mustang guy i think that him saying it is not original is akin to blowing smoke up your ass. all 65-78 blocks are identical from the outside except for boss 302 and mexican blocks so unless you check the numbers you can not tell by looking at it. another thing i was going to ask is about the serial number. i see you gave the info off of the door tag but have you checked the inner front fender apron to see if it matches? i have seen many stolen cars renumbered and you may infact have a hipo and not know it. i found a cougar XR7-G (think Shelby cougar! the G stood for Gurney as in Dan Gurney) a couple years ago that a guy was restoring but gave up when he joined the cougar club and they told him that there was no way it was a G car because the vin said it was a san jose car. it had all of the correct parts so i bought it as a parts car and when i took of the dash pad the plate came with it (it was a 68) and then when i took off the front fenders i found the real number bondo-ed over. later, hawkrod
__________________
Hawkrod

39 Ford Deluxe Coupe
59 Tbird 430
(2)62 Tbirds
(3)68 Cougar XR7-G's
69 Cougar 428CJ 4 speed
77 1/2 Ford F250 4X4 w/460 swap
86 SVO mustang

<font size=4><a href="http://www.superford.org/registry/profile.php?user=2829"> look at my cars past and present at superford! </A></Font>
hawkrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2002, 13:44   #9 (permalink)
Multi Car Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 36
have k289 spotter guide literature

First off, hawkrod is right about 2V GT's and GTA's for 67. You just don't get dual exhaust with chrome quad tips poking out under cutouts in the rear valence without a 4V. It pays to check my books rather than just go off the top of my head. I have a pic of the hipo 289 spotters guide that I found on the net attached to this message. It looks like the one that was published in Mustang Monthly years ago. I have that issue somewhere, but finding it online is way quicker. I ran your vin on codecracker. The result is 67 hardtop with 289 2V and the 27,159th car built at the Metuchen plant in New Jersey that year.
I couldn't make complete sense out of the other numbers you posted. 65A is hardtop with standard interior and bucket seats, 2A is black interior, but 200227627 is ? You must have the color, trim, date, dso, axle and trans codes all jumbled up in there. Can you post the data off the door tag in order?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hp_engine_spec.jpg (118.9 KB, 189 views)
tyrantX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2002, 21:05   #10 (permalink)
Vintage Mustang Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Age: 28
Posts: 26
Wow, thanks for all of the info. I feel kind of stupid asking all of these questions but how else am i supposed to learn? So thank you very much for having patience and the time to help out the "new kid". Well to start off, the distrib. does say autolitebut i cand find any dates so would you specify where exactly that is. Second, the distrib doesnt seem to have any vacum andvance holes or plates but i dont know what that is or what it looks like. It definately doesnt have that piece hanging off of it as it does in the picture (im guessing that is the vacum). I dont know what you mean by checking the numbers but ive heard it before and assumed it was looking at the numbers on the block but i cant even see the block much less see any numbers or letters. Do i need some kind of book to look up the numbers or is there a different way to check them? Ive already looked to try to find the data plate on the fender apron but i couldnt see anything with numbers or letters. Maybe im looking in the wrong place so where exactly is that? i checked the vin decoder also and got the same thing but im positive thats the order of the numbers although the plate doesnt look like what the plate looks like in the pictures. i guessed the door plate looked different than the apron plate. In the magazine it says the exhaust manifolds are angled downward but i have what looks to be try y headers that i have seen in some of my parts catalogs. Just asking but how hard is it to take off valve covers? basically all i have is a few tools from my dad which include basic socket wrenches and screwdrivers. I probably wont get back to you on checking things on the car because im getting it painted but ill get it back in about a week or so. Thanks for the help again!
baseball4lf8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Mustang Forum



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.