In alt.autos.ford.focus The Real Tom <Tom @ www.workathomeplans.com>:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:34:48 -0000, "Jim" <yeah@nothanks.com> wrote:
>><bbarkow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1109793500.055185.326940@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>>I couldn't find an FAQ to see whether it was ok to post this, but it's
>>> sort of on topic, I guess. I don't think this one fits the SVT, just
>>> the garden-variety models.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMESE%3AIT
>>>
>>
>>why would anyone want one of these??
>>lingerie for cars - whatever next :)
> Personally I like the bra-less look better.
Found the "spoiler", likely to add some extra fuel consumption in
addition to perhaps even reduced Vmax most amazing.
Are there really people out using something like this? With lots
of unpaved roads/etc it would make at least some sense.
--
Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94)
mail: echo
zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/'
#bofh excuse 167: excessive collisions & not enough packet
ambulances