2002 Ford Explorer XLT: Still Top of Its Class - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2002, 23:27   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
2002 Ford Explorer XLT: Still Top of Its Class

A much-improved Explorer keeps its best-selling spot
10-9-02/ AutoWeek

LIKES
V8 option
Available third row
Nice ride

DISLIKES
Price
Conservative styling
Electronannies

THE 2002 FORD EXPLORER SITS HEAD AND shoulders above the previous Explorer. It has more room, more safety features and is a more stable and versatile vehicle overall. It's also the best-selling sport/utility vehicle in America, a title it is trying to hold on to in the face of sales that are a little off target, and in an ever more crowded midsize SUV segment.

So there's pressure here, and expectations are running high. But based on what we've heard from Explorer owners, those expectations have mostly been met. Many wrote to say they're pleased with their vehicles, pointing out fit-and-finish, ride, passenger capacity and reliability as reasons.

We agree. And that Explorer is available with a 240-hp, 280-lb-ft V8 engine that has a 7300-pound tow capacity is another big plus. Its most obvious competitor, the inline six-equipped-only Chevrolet TrailBlazer, will pull 6300 pounds.

At the track, our 4099-pound V8 Explorer posted a 9.63-second 0-to-60-mph run, a little off the 9.41 seconds we recorded for the heavier TrailBlazer. In the quarter-mile, the Explorer did 17.0 seconds at 78.5 mph, again slightly bested by the TrailBlazer's 16.97 seconds at 82.8 mph. The Ford truck, however, beats the Chevy in braking ability, not surprising given its roughly 500-pound weight advantage. Using 141 feet to stop from 60 mph, the Explorer exhibited little to moderate brake dive. On the skidpad it was mild-mannered, plowing just a little.

In passing tests, we found the transmission was sometimes reluctant to kick down. On our 40-to-60-mph runs, it did not kick down to second as we would have expected. It popped out of third on our last 60- to-80-mph run, but couldn't decide whether to engage fourth, even though the engine revs dropped to idle as we floored the throttle. The transmission tended to hunt and seek way more than we would have liked.

Interior materials in our test vehicle appeared to be of good quality, with high-grade vinyls and plastics covering the panels, dash and door inlays. The interior was better than what you find in a pickup, but then you expect that in an SUV. Where Explorer shines is in its offering of a third-row seat, which-thanks to its independent rear-means seven people can fit.

But it's not cheap. Our XLT with cloth seats stickered at $33,640, almost a grand more than the leather-wrapped TrailBlazer.

Owners considered a variety of both domestic and imported SUVs, and they even looked at cars (Crown Vic), minivans (Town & Country) and crossovers (Rendezvous) before settling on the Explorer. Many cited positive dealer experiences as motivation for their purchase.

We could do without all the Explorer's electro-nannies. The constant beeping when you're trying to maneuver a boat in tow, sans seatbelt, is an annoyance.

We also wish Explorer had gotten a snazzier exterior. Next to the more muscular TrailBlazer, it looks bland. But as with any bestseller, shooting for the middle ground is key to its success. As things stand, Ford is getting it right.

ROAD TEST DATA SPECIFICATIONS
CHASSIS
Body-on-frame four-door sport/ute
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase (in): 113.7
Length/width (in): 189.5/72.1
Curb weight (lbs): 4099
SUSPENSION
Front: Unequal-length control
arms with coil-over shocks
Rear: Unequal-length control
arms with coil-over shocks
BRAKES
F/R: Discs/discs; ABS
WHEELS AND TIRES
Alloy P245/65R-17
BFGoodrich Rugged Trak T/A
CAPACITIES
Fuel (gal): 22.5
Cargo (cu ft): 46.6
ENGINE
Front-longitudinal
4.6-liter/280.7-cid eight-cylinder
Horsepower: 240 @ 4750 rpm
Torque (lb-ft): 280 @ 4000 rpm
Compression ratio: 9.4:1
Valvetrain: sohc
Fuel delivery: Electronic
sequential multi-point
fuel injection
Fuel requirement: 87 octane
FUEL MILEAGE
EPA combined: 16.38 mpg
AW overall: 22.39 mpg
DRIVETRAIN
Rear-wheel drive
Transmission: Five-speed automatic
Final drive ratio: 3.73:1
STANDING-START ACCELERATION
0-30 mph: 2.71 sec
0-40 mph: 4.32 sec
0-50 mph: 6.51 sec
0-60 mph: 9.63 sec
0-100 km/h (62.1 mph): 10.15 sec
0-quarter-mile: 78.5 mph,
17.0 sec
ROLLING ACCELERATION
20-40 mph (first gear): 3.6 sec
40-60 mph (third gear): 5.6 sec
60-80 mph (third gear): 8.0 sec
BRAKING
80 mph-0: 269 ft
60 mph-0: 141 ft
30 mph-0: 35 ft
HANDLING
490-foot slalom: 40.0 mph
Lateral acceleration
(200-foot skidpad): 0.71 g
INTERIOR NOISE (dBA)
Idle: 43
Full throttle: 72
Steady 60 mph: 64
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 0930af-explorer6.jpeg (21.1 KB, 269 views)
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-09-2002, 23:30   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
A pic of the interior....
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 0930af-explorer4.jpeg (15.8 KB, 9 views)
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford family celebrates 100 years of cars Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 06-10-2003 05:46
FORD TOUGH: The pressure's on for Bill Ford Jr. to finish first Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 06-10-2003 04:52
'Henry had the dream' Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 03-28-2003 05:58
A CENTURY OF VISION: Fords built city, changed the world Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 03-12-2003 07:17
Ford Product-Led Transformation: 2003 RPO83 Trans | Driveline 0 07-22-2002 06:48

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:05.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.