New Taurus perfectly fine, though somewhat anonymous - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2002, 20:20   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
New Taurus perfectly fine, though somewhat anonymous

BY STEVEN COLE SMITH
THE ORLANDO SENTINEL (KRT)

You want to know what's wrong with Ford? It's sitting in the parking lot -- a silver Ford Taurus SES.

No, there's nothing wrong with the car. The 2002 Taurus, along with the 2003 model, is a solid midsized sedan, capable of hauling around five adults in comparative comfort. Between the two there are only a handful of minor changes, such as illuminated cruise control switches and a new color (Gold Ash Metallic).

What's wrong is how Ford has botched the Taurus brand. When the car was introduced in 1986, it was a genuine revelation, something brand new, which suddenly made sedans from GM, Chrysler and even Honda and Toyota look pedestrian. Though there were teething problems, the early Taurus and its twin, the Mercury Sable, were pretty good cars.

The 1992 redesign was more of a freshening, and when time came for the complete 1996 redesign, the pressure was on -- Ford had been selling basically the same car for 10 years, and it needed the '96 to be a home run. It wasn't. It was overweight, and had a face like a gasping catfish and the profile of a melting Milk Dud. An emergency facelift was ordered, and it was successful, but by then, it seemed Ford had lost interest in the Taurus.

When was the last time you saw an ad for a Taurus? A Taurus TV commercial? Even so, it is the seventh-best-selling vehicle in the country and the third-best-selling car, behind the Accord and the Camry. Granted, a lot of the Taurus production goes to fleet sales, such as rental agencies, but the Taurus remains a profitable car.

Yet it isn't scheduled for a redesign until at least 2005, if it isn't phased out, replaced by the larger 500. Meanwhile, the Camry was new for 2002, the Accord new for 2003.

That said, the test car -- a midlevel SES model with the 3.0-liter Duratec V-6 -- lacks the refinement of the Honda and Toyota, but is nonetheless a very pleasant, if anonymous, sedan. The suspension could be firmer, the steering more precise, but overall, it's a car that handles around-town chores and highway travel with equal grace.

There are some nice features, such as adjustable pedals and a strong Mach audio system with a six-disc CD changer. And on the safety side, anti-lock brakes are standard, with side air bags and traction control together a $565 option. The cloth-covered front bucket seats are comfortable, rear-seat room is adequate, and the trunk is among the largest in the class. And regarding the styling, I think this is a very handsome car, the best-looking Taurus yet.

But as Ford sends the Taurus into the future with baby steps, the competition leaps. The 2003 Accord V-6 has 40 more horsepower, a five-speed automatic transmission instead of the Taurus' four-speed, and plenty of additional features, at a list price about the same as our $24,300 Taurus. How will Ford keep the Taurus moving? By discounting -- there's a $2,500 rebate on the 2002 Taurus, and already, a $1,000 rebate on the 2003 model.

That's fine. But wouldn't it be more satisfying and profitable to do what Ford did in 1986? To simply build a car that's better, or at least dramatically different, than what everyone else was selling?

Easier said than done, I know. But Ford has done it before.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg taurus.jpeg (13.8 KB, 282 views)
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
History of the Ford Taurus Part One (1985-1991) RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 1 05-15-2003 07:10
History of the Ford Taurus Part One (1985-1991) RPO83 Ford Taurus | Mercury Sable | Ford Taurus SHO | 1986-2007 0 05-06-2003 02:19
Ford Adds Luxury And Refinement To Taurus Sedan And Wagon For 2003 RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 0 11-22-2002 00:43
The Six Millionth Ford Taurus Sold RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 1 10-24-2002 07:53
2003 Ford Taurus Overview RPO83 Ford Worldwide News 0 07-22-2002 06:58

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.