United States: More Ford job cuts needed, execs told - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-18-2003, 05:05   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
United States: More Ford job cuts needed, execs told

White-collar workers are under the gun
July 18, 2003

BY JAMIE BUTTERS AND JEFFREY MCCRACKEN
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITERS

Ford Motor Co. is likely to eliminate up to 2,000 white-collar jobs in North America later this year as it further slashes costs to meet long-range targets, said Ford executives, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

The executives told the Free Press on Thursday that an announcement to employees could come as soon as this morning, as Ford plans to formally open contract negotiations with the UAW.

The move is part of a global effort still taking form to shave salary-related expenses by 10 percent, less than half coming from job cuts.

Chairman and CEO William Clay Ford Jr. told his top executives late last month that they would have to accelerate cost-cutting to keep the company's 5-year revitalization plan on track in light of heavy competition, falling market share and record incentives.

Ford told the executives: "Even if the outside world gets worse, we have to meet our targets."

They came back this week with proposals to do it, said another company insider, who stressed that final plans are months away. The proposals include reducing overtime and travel, increasing attrition, halting hires, cutting agency or supplemental employees -- even voluntary or involuntary job cuts.

Spokesman Ron Iori said Thursday the company had no comment.

Ford has about 45,000 salaried positions in North America.

The executives said Executive Vice President James Padilla told his staff Thursday that his North American group would cut its salaried-employee expenses by 9 percent -- an amount that would be nearly impossible to reach with just overtime and contract-employee cutbacks.

While rough for employees, such a move would be welcome on Wall Street, where a growing number of investors and analysts say they doubt that the restructuring plan announced in January 2002 will be enough for Fordto earn $7 billion before taxes by 2005 or 2006.

The plan included layoffs of 21,500 workers in North America and a proposal to close five plants.

"Well, clearly their auto operations are barely profitable and that's not acceptable," said Stephen Girsky, auto analyst at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter in New York.

"They've got a bloated cost structure and if they do this or make some sort of announcement about salaried cost-cutting on the same day of the UAW handshakes, they're showing that they want everyone to contribute." Like other automakers, Ford has been cutting costs for years -- reducing travel and overtime and shedding thousands of direct and contract employees -- so this round of cuts could be particularly difficult.

In August 2001, Ford offered employees a voluntary early-retirement plan to eliminate 10 percent of the automaker's white-collar workforce in the United States, or about 5,000 workers.

About 3,500 were gone by the end of 2001, and the other 1,500 were gone early in 2002.

That announcement was one of the first external signs the onetime industry leader in profits was headed for a financial collapse that culminated in the ouster of then-CEO Jacques Nasser and the January 2002 decision to close the plants and eliminate 21,500 jobs.

Chrysler, in the wake of a projected $1.1-billion loss in the second quarter, has also begun squeezing costs within its non-union workforce.

In late May, it delayed merit raises for 16,500 white-collar workers by three months. It has also raised out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs and medical visits, begun a hiring freeze and ended overtime on the first few hours above 40 hours in a week.

About 19,000 Chrysler white-collar retirees also saw their out-of-pocket medical costs increased as of July 1.

General Motors Corp. has also cut its white-collar costs. On Jan. 1, GM substantially increased medical premiums for its active and retired white-collar workers. For example, more than 160,000 retirees who had previously paid little or nothing for health care benefits saw their premiums jump by as much as $51 a month.

Late in 2001, all three automakers, led by Ford, cut payments to contractors by 7 percent or more.
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-20-2003, 07:22   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
Plan B: Ford chops at costs

July 19, 2003

BY JAMIE BUTTERS AND JEFFREY MCCRACKEN
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITERS

Whether Ford Motor Co. executives want to admit it or not, they are now on to Plan B.

THE MESSAGE FROM SCHEELE
This is part of the note Ford Chief Operating Officer Nick Scheele sent to Ford Motor Co. employees Friday.
To: Ford employees worldwide

When we announced second-quarter earnings earlier this week, we reported another quarter of significant progress in our revitalization efforts. Our cost performance, in particular, has garnered strong interest in the way we're pulling together to make Ford Motor Company a more efficient and cost-effective automaker. In many areas, these cost improvements were critical offsets to lower revenues related to the increasingly competitive marketplace. . . .

Despite this excellent work, we still face uncertain economies around the globe and a fiercely competitive marketplace. As a result, it is imperative that we continue looking at all of our costs globally to achieve even higher levels of efficiency and cost competitiveness. . . .

Each region will examine every method to reduce costs further, including reductions in travel, consulting, and other discretionary expenses. In addition, we have asked each operation to reduce salaried-related costs by about 10 percent by the end of the year. In some cases I anticipate that we can achieve this reduction through attrition, selective hiring freezes, elimination of overtime, and reduction in agency and supplemental workers, and purchased services.

However, where these actions cannot fully meet the targets, we will have to reduce our salaried personnel structure to address the balance.

I recognize that these are difficult actions. We will do our best to keep you informed on our progress as we move forward. . . .


Earnings not enough to stop white-collar job cuts

The mandate to cut white-collar expenses by 10 percent, announced to employees Friday in a company-wide e-mail, could mean up to 1,800 job cuts not envisioned in the original plan.

Throughout its centennial celebrations last month, Ford executives continued to insist that the January 2002 revitalization plan -- which called for closing five plants and eliminating 21,500 jobs in North America -- was on track and not needing further cuts.

Thanks to accelerated cost-cutting and strong earnings at Ford Credit, the company still expects to earn $1.25 billion this year. But to hit the $7 billion mid-decade pre-tax profit target it promised Wall Street, further cuts are needed.

In the memo, Chief Operating Officer Nick Scheele stressed that departments would lower costs through attrition, hiring freezes, reduced overtime and travel, and fewer contractors. But he warned that "where these actions cannot fully meet the targets, we will have to reduce our salaried personnel structure."

Ford executives said Hertz, Mazda and Ford Credit are excluded from the cuts, which will affect 79,000 white-collar automotive employees worldwide.

Scheele said the moves are needed to address "uncertain economies around the globe and a fiercely competitive marketplace."

A marketplace so ruthless that it has become clear that Plan A was not enough and it is time for Plan B.

Longtime Ford insiders wouldn't use those terms, which for them recall eras when it meant changing the plan instead of addressing the problems at hand.

But Friday's memo looks like what to turn to when the first plan doesn't get the job done.

Some analysts who follow Ford for investors have warned that the January 2002 plan was not enough. That plan called for Ford to cut $6 billion from overhead and improve the bottom line by another $3 billion through other means. Ford said Wednesday it had cut $1.9 billion so far this year, including $1.3 billion in the second quarter.

"Obviously the company's under a lot of pressure to cut cost in every single way," said Scott Sprinzen, who studies the auto industry for credit-rating agency Standard & Poor's Corp.

Ford is rated just two notches above a high-risk junk borrower, and Sprinzen has warned that another downgrade would be likely if Ford does not end 2003 with a profit from its automotive operations.

The likelihood of cuts in the salaried workforce also raises the possibility that Ford will look to close more than the five plants -- four domestic and one Canadian -- identified in the 2002 plan.

"It's a fair question," said Michael Jackson, an automotive analyst with CSM Worldwide in Northville. "There are a number of facilities that are clearly under-utilized and that don't have the advantage of flexible manufacturing."

Ford executives have acknowledged that Wixom Assembly -- home of the Ford Thunderbird and Lincoln Town Car -- is under pressure, even though it's not one of the five plants on the closing list.

"Wixom is absolutely up in the air," said a top UAW official familiar with national Ford contract talks. "It has no product and its local chairman is sweating right now."

Also dogging Ford are the buyer incentives that have lowered what people pay for their vehicles.

Incentives such as low-interest financing and cash-back rebates on new cars and trucks have skyrocketed this year, jumping 43.5 percent from a year ago to $2,455 per vehicle compared to $1,710 per vehicle, according to Autodata Corp.

Incentives on Ford, Lincoln and Mercury vehicles have jumped 41.7 percent to $3,082 per vehicle. That's up from $2,175 per vehicle a year ago.

Ford is the second of the domestic automakers to suddenly announce its plans for 2003 were run off the road by heavier-than-expected incentives.

In early June, DaimlerChrysler said its Chrysler division (Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge vehicles) would lose $1.1 billion in the second quarter and struggle to make any money for the year -- just a few months after predicting a $2 billion profit for Chrysler in 2003.

Chrysler -- like Ford -- quickly moved to cut white-collar spending with a hiring freeze, eliminating most white-collar overtime and delaying merit raises for three months.

General Motors Corp., which started the incentive wars, has avoided making any such moves. The mainreason GM has been able to swallow the larger incentives is that it has the most efficient assembly plants, requiring fewer hours to make a vehicle. GM has also been able to use incentives to steer consumers to higher-profit vehicles like the Cadillac CTS luxury car or the Pontiac Trailblazer sport-utility vehicle.

GM incentives are up 52.6 percent so far this year to $3,389 per vehicle, compared to $2,221 a year ago. However, GM has continued to hit its earnings for Wall Street and on Thursday was optimistic about the rest of the year.
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford family celebrates 100 years of cars Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 06-10-2003 05:46
FORD TOUGH: The pressure's on for Bill Ford Jr. to finish first Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 06-10-2003 04:52
'Henry had the dream' Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 03-28-2003 05:58
A CENTURY OF VISION: Fords built city, changed the world Stacy94PGT Ford Worldwide News 0 03-12-2003 07:17
Ford Product-Led Transformation: 2003 RPO83 Trans | Driveline 0 07-22-2002 06:48

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:53.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.