US:Ford delays filing quarterly report with regulators - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2006, 19:07   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
US:Ford delays filing quarterly report with regulators

Ford delays filing quarterly report with regulators

Reuters

DETROIT -- Ford Motor Co. today said it was delaying the filing of its quarterly report with the Securities and Exchange Commission while the company completes a restatement of past results.

Ford said last month it would restate results from 2001 to the second quarter of this year because of an accounting change related to interest-rate swaps that were taken out to hedge against the company's long-term debt.

Ford said it planned to file its report for the third-quarter with the SEC by Tuesday, Nov. 14.
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-10-2006, 07:23   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
Re: US:Ford delays filing quarterly report with regulators

Ford files for SEC extension to fix accounting errors

BY SARAH A. WEBSTER

DETROIT FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Ford Motor Co. told the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday it would need a five-day extension to revise its earnings from 2001 until now, to correct accounting errors.

On Oct. 23, Ford said it lost $5.8 billion in the July-September period, bringing year-to-date losses to $7.2 billion.

However, the automaker said that was a preliminary result because it needed to restate its earnings for the last six years to fix an accounting error that has snagged many companies in recent years.

The deadline for filing that update was Thursday, but the automaker said it couldn't meet the deadline "without unreasonable effort or expense" and needed more time to make the complex adjustments.

"The analysis and preparation of our restated financial information is not yet complete," Ford said in a filing to notify the SEC of the delay.

Ford now says it will file its restatement on or before Nov. 14.

Several top analysts who have reviewed the accounting problem believed the error was technical in nature, relating to the way companies account for hedging activities, and not uncommon.

CFO Magazine reported in May that many companies have had a problem applying SFAS 133, which is an accounting rule issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, since they began complying with it six years ago.

Last year, the magazine reported, 57 companies restated their earnings because of faulty hedge accounting -- up from 27 in 2004.

"A lot of savvy companies were caught out on this," said Wesley Smyth, vice president and senior accounting analyst at Moody's Investors Service.

Hedges, in general, are investments designed to offset changing prices, such as fluctuations in currencies or commodities. In Ford's case, the company's credit arm enters into hedges to protect against fluctuations in the interest rate. How Ford has accounted for those hedges is the issue.

The value of the hedge changes with everyday market conditions, and the company's financial statements are supposed to reflect those ups and downs unless a company qualifies for a certain exemption.

They can do that if they can prove that their hedge is highly effective in offsetting the fluctuations, under the rules and guidance outlined in SFAS 133, which is about 1,000 pages long, Smyth said.

Many companies mistakenly thought they qualified for this exemption under a provision known as the "shortcut" method. Now they have to record changes in the value of their hedges in financial results.

"That increases the volatility," Smyth said.

Ford acknowledges now that it didn't qualify for the exemption, even though "these interest-rate swaps were and continue to be highly effective economic hedges."
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > Latest Ford News and Racing News > Ford Worldwide News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:30.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.