|
I've done some additional research since my initial thread was posted and I have some new information. "russellw" posted some interesting information on "threadid=37118" on 9/5/03. I hope he doesn't mind me quoting his good work!
He had 400 m times and 0 -100 times (as well as graphs and accelleration data) for 3 cars, being an XR6T, XR8 and GT. In summary he found the following:
400 m (all autos):
XR6T - 14.22
XR8 - 14.16
GT - 13.98
In comparison Motor magazine July 2003 issue had the following times:
400 m (all manuals):
XR6T - 14.14
XR8 - 14.40
GT - 13.98
"russellw" 0 - 100 (all autos)
XR6T - 6.04
XR8 - 6.22
GT - 5.84
Motor magazine July 2003, 0 - 100 times (all manuals):
XR6T - 5.91
XR8 - 6.16
GT - 5.78
In conclusion there doesn't seem to be much in it over 400 m for the GT in auto and manual form!!!
I'd love to see a side by side test on the same track, temp, weather conditions ect., ect.
If anyone has heard of such a comparison please post it.
Cheers!
|