TR-3650 vs T56 - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Australian Ford's Discussion > FPV & Tickford Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Insurance Garage Mark Forums Read Auto EscrowAuto Loans

FPV & Tickford Forum GT, GT-P and all FPV Discussions. Formerly Tickford.

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2004, 16:10   #1 (permalink)
New Car Kid
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth, W.A.
Age: 34
Posts: 90
TR-3650 vs T56

What's everyone's opinion on the last two manual's in terms of strength?
The TTC site lists the T56's weight in the 52-58kg range for the 610nm spec boxes but when you travel over to the TR-3650 section, the 520nm box weighs 60 kg.

Now, call me crazy, but I can't see how a gearbox that was designed in the late 80's/early 90's with 6 speeds can be 2-8kg lighter than a 5 speed designed in the late 90's. (This thread is not designed to be a MkI vs MkII basher, and to remove any suspicion of personal bias, I hearby state my ownership of a TR-3650 equipped vehicle)
CAT600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-18-2004, 19:11   #2 (permalink)
When 2 T3s are not enough
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,934
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

There must be a lot of lighter bits & bobs in there for it to be lighter???????
__________________
TS50 no-125
TE50 no-94
"The TE50 is the best high performance sedan Australia has ever produced"
Street machine Feb 2002
TE50T3 Remember the GTHO? well your getting close.
Motor mag Jan 2002

Wouldn't you love to say that about your car?You loosers
Noboss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 19:42   #3 (permalink)
Movin!
 
Rodderz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Over yonder
Age: 34
Posts: 2,924
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

I guess we will find out the strengths of them after people have their cars getting some big power via edit

I drove a new 6spd T-56 in an XR8 ute a few months ago and the shift quality was better than what the 3650 was stock....i got a short shift kit and its better than both but I would guess the T-56 would be better with a short shift, plus the ratio's are better matched
__________________
BAXR8 Ute 5M- 13.51@106.03
zorst, SS Cai,240rwkw
Rodderz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 19:53   #4 (permalink)
New Car Kid
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth, W.A.
Age: 34
Posts: 90
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbutler
There must be a lot of lighter bits & bobs in there for it to be lighter???????
I have seen the size (width) of the gears inside a 3650. The salesman in the showroom had one sitting on the desk as a paperweight. It looked impressive, but one must ask why it was outside the box?
CAT600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 21:21   #5 (permalink)
The SB Slayer
 
FPVGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Should be polishing my GT's
Posts: 1,529
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT600
What's everyone's opinion on the last two manual's in terms of strength?
The TTC site lists the T56's weight in the 52-58kg range for the 610nm spec boxes but when you travel over to the TR-3650 section, the 520nm box weighs 60 kg.

Now, call me crazy, but I can't see how a gearbox that was designed in the late 80's/early 90's with 6 speeds can be 2-8kg lighter than a 5 speed designed in the late 90's. (This thread is not designed to be a MkI vs MkII basher, and to remove any suspicion of personal bias, I hearby state my ownership of a TR-3650 equipped vehicle)
6 speed without a doubt if it is lighter and has an extra gear that is defanately a plus.I think the 5 speed is and was outdated for the new series of Falcons and FPV cars.
__________________
THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE LEGEND THE GT is back

Introducing the Boss 290 powerplant
The Boss 290 combines the best of both worlds, with race-bred power and everyday comfort. The awe-inspiring Boss 290 is a powerplant unlike any ever built in this country and comes to life on Australia's only current V8 production line.
FPVGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 22:48   #6 (permalink)
ESP Man
 
shaynet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Gosford NSW Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 888
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

Ask Mal Woods - he would know the answer.

Maybe the 6 speed has stronger metals that are lighter? Or it might be in the weight of the casing.
__________________
The cop said "Do you know why I pulled you over". I said " Well, that all depends on how long you have been following me!"
shaynet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 00:34   #7 (permalink)
New Car Kid
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth, W.A.
Age: 34
Posts: 90
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

Quote:
Originally Posted by FPVGT
6 speed without a doubt if it is lighter and has an extra gear that is defanately a plus.I think the 5 speed is and was outdated for the new series of Falcons and FPV cars.
I hear you about the advantages of a lighter 6 speed, but saying that it was outdated goes against facts and the idea behind the thread. What I am asking is this:
- The T56 is a six speed first used in the Viper in 92/93. It is very strong and reliable and uses a single rail shift linkage system.
- The TR3560 is a five speed first used in the 00/01 Cobra. It may/may not be strong (that's part of what i'm asking) and uses a multiple selector shaft arrangement for more precise shifting.

I cannot understand how a later technology gearbox, with less moving parts (less gears) can be significantly heavier without some upside to the whole equation.

So maybe a better way to have put this thread was this: How strong is this box?, Whats the most power anybody's put through it? and has anybody broken one? Cheers D:
CAT600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 04:21   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
jimt3te50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Age: 33
Posts: 316
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

FTe had the option of going the t56 in the last of the t series cars and went against it- straight cut gears in the tr3650 should make it the STRONGER of the two (not necessarily better)- from all reports you can not kill the 3650, basically a toploader witha fifth gear- and a few comments through the press labelling it as a road cars' hollinger.

On a side note, I know there has been a lot of FPV bashing lately- "series 2 comes out and no more power etc etc- why won't FPV listen?" To be honest I think they did listen and that's why now we have a six speed- people always compare against HSV, let's hope FPV don't follow too many of the dark side's traits.........

Anyway, my THOUGHTS on the subject of which is the STRONGER of the 2 would be the 3650- similair dollars, and by rights, if the 3650 has the fewer gears/synchros etc there has to be something to make the value of the 3650 stand up- strength could be it........
jimt3te50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 12:27   #9 (permalink)
SBR Supporter
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,926
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

I think they should get rid of the crappy T56 they use now and use this one in all their cars...

http://www.gforcetransmissions.com/tran_gt-56.asp

At least that way they'll insure that the torque output of their cars won't break their gearbox......
__________________
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 12:34   #10 (permalink)
SBR Supporter
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,926
Re: TR-3650 vs T56

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimt3te50
Anyway, my THOUGHTS on the subject of which is the STRONGER of the 2 would be the 3650- similair dollars, and by rights, if the 3650 has the fewer gears/synchros etc there has to be something to make the value of the 3650 stand up- strength could be it........
From their site - the strongest TR3650, the TR-3650-2 TCET1858 is capable of handling 528Nm of torque (390ftlbs). http://www.ttcautomotive.com/English...ts/TR-3650.asp

From their site - the strongest T56, the TUET1806 is capable of handling 746Nm of torque (550ftlbs). http://www.ttcautomotive.com/English/products/T-56.asp

Nope, TR3650 is not anywhere close to being as strong as the T56 from the factory.

T56 is the second strongest manual they make for cars, only losing to the 5-speed TKO600... which can take 600ftlbs of torque (813Nm).
__________________
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Australian Ford's Discussion > FPV & Tickford Forum



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nokia 3650 annoying ring volume problem. !Gn|T|0n The Pub 9 04-19-2004 05:01

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:12.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.