3.2 + 3.9 = Grunt? - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 03:44 PM Thread Starter
LET EM' RIPPP
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,819
3.2 + 3.9 = Grunt?

Hey guys,

Ok, this little thought has been bugging me for a while.

I have heard of almost every man and his dog using a 302 block and heads, and installing a 351 crank and pistons etc. With a few other mods, the engins tend to get quite powerfull.

So, I then thought to myself, would it work with a 3.2L EA six, with a 3.9L crank, pistons, cam, ECU, Mainfold and injection?
Or in other words, bolt on a 3.2L head onto a 3.9L engine.

Any comments anyone?

CAUTION: Slippery When BOOSTING!
Bass Crazy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 04:18 PM
89 DA LTD 3.9MPI
 
Zomwit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 364
I think the 3.2 was identical to the 3.9 CFI in every way apart from the stroke. SO essentially the 3.9 CFI is a 3.2 stroker.

Normality is the most common form of insanity

--ath0-- ....gone
Zomwit is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 427
the 3.2 head has much smaller valves and ports so it wouldnt go well.
we looked into that when we took a 3.2 engine out and someone wanted to buy the head because the head on his 3.9 blew. but it didnt go very well.
jamesk is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:21 PM Thread Starter
LET EM' RIPPP
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,819
I'm sure bigger valves could be installed, and opening up the ports is an easy one.

"but it didn't go very well" , Does this mean that guy tried it?

CAUTION: Slippery When BOOSTING!
Bass Crazy is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:30 PM
Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
.

Am I missing something here??
You put a 3.9 crank, rods, pistons etc in a 3.2L you would have yourself a 3.9 with a more restrictive than stock 3.9 head. Add a 3.9L head and you would have an exact 3.9 engine, which wouldnt go any better than a factory 3.9.

So im not sure what the point of this would be?
 
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:33 PM Thread Starter
LET EM' RIPPP
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,819
Re: .

A 3.9 engine with a shit load more compression because of the 3.2 head.
Well thats how the 302-351 thing works anyway.

I was wondering if these work the same way, looks like they don't.

CAUTION: Slippery When BOOSTING!
Bass Crazy is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:35 PM
mickt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
.

I think BC might be thinking of higher compression by putting on a 3.2l head.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:36 PM
mickt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
.

Yep, beat me to it :)
 
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:43 PM
Martin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
.

If you want higher compression why dont you just shave the stock 3.9 head?.


What some guys with the Clevos do is is use a 351 crank, 302 rods, and aftermarket pistons. This apparently makes the engine a bit more rev happy than a standard 351 but with the same displacement.

Maybe this is what your thinking of?


Im not sure how this would work with the inline 6 though(3.9 crank, 3.2 rods), the pistons would have to be custom made though($$$$)
 
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 03-25-02, 05:46 PM Thread Starter
LET EM' RIPPP
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,819
Re: .

I am positive the 302 head was used to up the compression. Same goes for the 289 heads on the 302.

CAUTION: Slippery When BOOSTING!
Bass Crazy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > Engine Specific Tech > Inline 6 Tech
Gear in this thread - Powered by O'Reilly Auto Parts


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EA Spack, 3.9 question . . . Gruntly Inline 6 Tech 9 01-14-04 03:40 AM
3.2 Rods & Pistons in a 3.9? Bass Crazy Inline 6 Tech 28 03-31-03 11:10 AM
diffrences between standard 3.9 to an SVO 3.9 Sprint_ED Inline 6 Tech 1 03-23-03 06:30 PM
4l into EA 3.9 RossD Inline 6 Tech 5 10-13-02 07:01 AM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome