Filters = Pod vs Panel - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-26-04, 08:13 PM Thread Starter
Gonna miss the ED :(
EED-250's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Perth, W.A.
Posts: 733
Filters = Pod vs Panel

Hey guys i got the panel filter and i was just wondering what (if any) differences there are between the two?

1994 ED 6CYL 14.8@92mph
EED-250 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-26-04, 08:43 PM
Registered User
jjj's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Qld
Posts: 278
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

Panels are generally better than pods unless you make a cold air feed for the pod. The problem with all e-series cars is that the intake scoop is on top of radiator shroud(this area gets hot) then feeds top to bottom in the air box. Holden use a better idea and take the air from behind the passenger headlight(much cooler) and air feeds from bottom to top. Quick and cheap mod on all holdens VK efi-VS commodores is to hole saw 100mm directly through the bottom of box and then run 100mm flexible piping down under wheel arch.

cheers JJJ
jjj is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-26-04, 08:55 PM
Yes, fords still kick
MickyB's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Frankston
Age: 35
Posts: 668
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

I am using a K&N Pod at the moment running off a XH snorkel, I find that I get slightly better top end urge using the Pod than the K&N panel which I also own. The difference is negligible though and the Panel looks heaps neater and is good as it is roadworthy!

Black EB S-XR6 5 Speed Lukey Exhaust Lowered AU2 Tickford Wheels
Alpine CDA-7892E,Alpine MRD-M500, Alpine MRV-F303, Alpine Type 'S' 12" Subs x 2, Boston Acoustics RC620 and CX-6
MickyB is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-26-04, 10:17 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Melbourne
Age: 32
Posts: 102
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

pods are roadworrthy in vic now as long as it is fixed securely i.e not haging of the inlet tube lolol

1994 White ED Futura Classic, clear front indicators, au2 clear side indicators, 95mm ride height obtained via king springs, camber kit, fairmont velour interior, 5" monster tacho, au2 17" xr8 rims, alpine mp3 deck, pioneer ts-d 6.5" front splits, 8" pioneer rear speakers, 50x4rws pioneer amp, 12" mtx thunder 8000 dvc sub, alpine mono block sub amp, k&n pod filter, 4.11's lsd, jmm dev-5 kit
EDFPV-6 is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-27-04, 12:28 AM
Registered User
EFFalcon's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Age: 33
Posts: 7,517
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

my god, filters
i'll get a panel if i get that far

1995 EF II Falcon GLi: Heritage Green, 4spd Auto, AUII 17" Rims, Custom BA Front Bar, Lowered, Gas Research LPG, Clear Indicators, JVC MP3 Headunit, Phoenix Gold 6.5" Splits, Coustic 481QE Amp, Clarion 12" sub, Leather Seats, Power Window Conversion, 3.45 LSD, Pacemaker Comp Extractors, 2.5" Exhaust, Mandrel Bent Intake, High Flow Filter, Wade 1004 110 cam.

In Progress: BA XR Side Skirts, BA XR Rear bar, BA Shifter Handle.

Want your EF on Drop me a PM!
E-Series Club Stickers Here!

E-Series Moderator/Membership Officer/Webmaster/Cruise Official
EFFalcon is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-27-04, 12:56 AM
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,819
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

I run an EF Air box in my car with a RushO2 performance air filter (RRP $100).

I could not notice any difference between this filter and a $7 supercheap auto filter... seriously.

The air box itself has some flow restrictions, so IMO, panel filters are a waste of money unless you sort that out first. On the other hand, its hard to beat a 3" pipe connected to a pod in the wheel arch, thats if you don't mind cutting holes that is.

As for ram air, I think everyone at the last Heathcote meet in melb proved that to be almost useless.

My 2c for the day


Bass Crazy is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 01-27-04, 01:02 AM
I am a Turbo Wanker
YOOT's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 35
Posts: 2,379
Re: Filters = Pod vs Panel

Go the panel filter, unless you have a sure fire better way of making a pod work, the factory panel setup is just fine. But at the end of the day, the filter will make zero difference to how the car performs. Autospeed have proven this. I still run stock intake and stock filter (30,000kms on the filter) and my car is still faster than it should be, the Ford setup is just fine unless you wanna run a turbo/supercharger.

By all means spend the money on a reusable air filter but don't expect to go any faster. Any one telling you it does is probably just experiencing the psychological 'go-faster'. If you swapped their airfilter without telling them I bet they'd never know the difference!

256rwkw @ 1920kgs
YOOT is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > Engine Specific Tech > Inline 6 Tech

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Instrument panel removal tag141 Australian Falcons 5 12-21-03 02:56 PM
Changing Falcon Instrument panel -> Fairmont defective General Tech 6 05-08-03 07:19 PM
Tickmod 3 - Fairmont rear panel tickfordboy General Tech 0 02-23-03 01:04 AM
K&N Panel Filters gmanEA General Tech 13 08-31-02 04:44 AM
Comparing Oil Filters Aussiblue General Tech 14 01-29-02 11:50 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome