Quote:
|
Originally Posted by george 351
Can someone with any knowledge on this subject please tell me the advantages and disadvantages of using either and also about their intended use.Cheers
|
There really are three material choices in (full) roller rocker arms:
Aluminum:
Lightweight, easily produced (extrusion process), usually lower cost can have a dampening affect on high-lift, solid valvetrain components due to shock absorbing qualities of aluminum.
Lots of different manufacturers. Some brands are cheap knock-offs and may not even measure up to their specified ratios. Use a well-known brand name like Crane, Comp Cams and various others.
Excellent choice for good all-around performance on the street or at the track. Some believe that the aluminum becomes more brittle over time, so perhaps a steel rocker would be better for a street engine where higher mileage is anticipated.
Stainless:
Very strong/rigid. Due to the material strength, the trunions can be made larger in diameter and take more load than smaller diameter parts in aluminum bodied rocker arms. Usually much more expensive. Definitely not necessary for street engines.
Chrome-Moly:
Very strong/rigid. Due to the material strength, the trunions can be made larger in diameter and take more load than smaller diameter parts in aluminum bodied rocker arms. Usually somewhat more expensive. Definitely not necessary for street engines, but a good choice in race engines.
I run Comp Cams "Pro Magnum" chrome-moly rocker arms on my race and street engines. They are a good choice and only about $50 more than Crane Gold. However, they are also only 1.70:1 ratio, not 1.73:1 as are the Cranes. This takes a slight edge off of your camshaft profile, making it somewhat less aggressive.
:davis: