289 vs 302 Windsor - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-11-2004, 15:43 Thread Starter
Now With 9 inch LSD Diff
all4ford's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Campbelltown
Age: 28
Posts: 575
289 vs 302 Windsor

Hi all I was just wondering which one out of these two engines you think is better and why?

Facts and figures would be good but the most important thing is your personal oppinions.

thanks all
all4ford is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-11-2004, 15:52
RIP Sox.....
Soxx's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sydney
Age: 46
Posts: 2,580
Re: 289 vs 302 Windsor

They are essentially the same engine. The 302 does have some very small advantages and the fact they are identical in physical size, the 302 makes a better choice, bigger capacity and all that.


4L I6, naturally aspirated producing 173.5rwkw.
14.410 @ 96.49mph with street radials.
What's that?..... Did I hear you say TQE power?
Soxx is offline  
post #3 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-11-2004, 16:42
Two SC 61's = trouble
ebxr8240's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Penrith,nswAus/Morrinville.NZ
Age: 62
Posts: 6,360
Re: 289 vs 302 Windsor

Maybe for an all out race motor where you want to rev to moon the shorter stroke of the 289. But as said they are the same and can be stroked to 347 as well.Depending a on what model 302 or latter 5Lr HO efi block the 289 is stronger though older then it depends on carrosion etc... ...

Don't be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the Ark...Professionals built the Titanic!
Tuned & maintained by "Peppertree Perfmormance". Dart block, Scat 4340 steel crank, Custom C.P pistons.Oliver rods.. Mal Wood twin plate clutch.. Twin SC61/2's,482 rwkw/ 645 rwhp..
Passengers, myocardial infarction material..
R.I.P Possum...
ebxr8240 is offline  
post #4 of 4 (permalink) Old 01-12-2004, 04:24
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 262
Re: 289 vs 302 Windsor

289 motors are good reving motors comparing them to 302's and especial to 351's. As for the stroking 289's you can't go past 3.1" stroke because when ford changed over to the 302 they basiclly extended the cylinder bores to help increase piston stability. The 289's don't have this upgrade and you definetly don't want the piston moving too far out of the bore at BDC. This dosen't apply to the SVO blocks....
I8AHSV is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > Engine Specific Tech > Windsor Tech

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
351 windsor heads on a 302 block eagarman Windsor Tech 13 08-14-2009 15:09
302 windsor info 69 mustang 351 Windsor Tech 5 08-20-2003 04:11
going from a 289 to 302 please help rosproline157 Windsor Tech 4 07-20-2003 04:32
Windsor 302 Roam Windsor Tech 6 09-05-2002 05:54
Windsor 302 (Mustang HO) XR_Strider_GuY Ford Mustang Forum 2 04-23-2002 17:44

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome