Different 302 engines which is better? - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
General Tech Have a question that is not covered by one of the other categories? This is the forum for all other items not specifically covered in other categories.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 01-04-07, 03:51 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Different 302 engines which is better?

Hello, I'm looking to getting a 302. I have found a few of them. One is a rebuilt 1976 carb out of a mustang. Another is I believe he said 1991? efi however it is not rebuilt.

I want something rebuilt however I don't want the 10 mpg that comes with the 1976. What's the mpg on the 1990's or later?

Which should i grab? I'm dropping it into a 1989 toyota pickup. So I will have to wire up the harness with that.

What do you think?

vinniepearl1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 01-09-07, 11:08 PM
429/460 Fanatic
Paul Kane's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 548
cool Re: Different 302 engines which is better?

I believe the 1986 5.0 is a sort of a transitional year engine, and the 1987 & up FI motors are essentially the same and the way to go. The 5.0 HO's and GT's have forged pistons in them. Not sure when they became roller cammed, but is was somewhere in the late 1980's.

My business partner rebuilds (freshens) those engines regularly, and rarely do they need much more than a light hone, rings, bearings timing chain, etc. Almost never any major issues seen at teardown, just freshen and reassemble. The later 302 roller motors are the way to go, in my opinion.


p.s.: This assumes U.S. specification engines.

We're on the web; click below:
High Flow Dynamics
Performance Components for the 429/460 Engine Family
Paul Kane is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 01-24-07, 06:11 AM
HO conversion guru
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 83
Re: Different 302 engines which is better?

fuel mileage is determined how efficient an engine is and what type of induction system you use, NOT what year the engine was built.

Becarefull of mid 70's to early 80's 302 blocks, they had a casting flaw and the water jackets at the rear of the block, around cylinders #4 and #8 will crack and leak externally.

ALL 81 and newer 302's have a 50oz imbalace and one piece rear main seal.
earlier 302's and 351W use a 28oz imbalance and 2 piece rear main seal.

ALL 86 and newer passenger car engines got EFI and Roller hyd cam, which included a double roller timing chain.
Most 85 year model passenger car blocks are machined to accept a hyd roller cam.

302 truck motors are essentially the same, except they have provisions for a knock sensor at the rear of the block, truck 302's didnt get a hyd roller cam until 91.

Be aware there are 2 types of 302 EFI motors; HO and non-HO. HO motors were used primarily in the Mustang from 87 to 95, but were also used in Lincoln mark 7's LSC from 89 to 92 and in the 91-93 thunderbird. HO motors have better cylinder heads (E7TE casting), more aggresive cam (266 duration and .444" lift) and flat top pistions with valve reliefs. HO motor also uses the 351W firing order.

non-HO motors were used in all other passenger cars (crown vic, grandmarquis, town car, 86-90 thunderbird and lincoln mark 7's non LSC). these motors had low flowing cylinder heads (E6SE casting), small cam (.379" lift) and cast, dished pistons with no valve reliefs.
88grandmarq is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > General Tech

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome