2003 Mazda 6S - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
» Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Mazda Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

Mazda Forum This area is for discussion of Mazda vehicles

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2003, 08:05   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
2003 Mazda 6S

April 21, 2003
By THE EDITORS OF AUTOWEEK

2003 MAZDA 6S

DATE IN FLEET: March 31-April 14
AS-TESTED PRICE: $25,345
POWERTRAIN: 3.0-liter V6; fwd, five-speed manual HP: 220 @ 6300 rpm TORQUE: 192 @ 5000 rpm
CURB WEIGHT: 3243 pounds

WILSON: Ah, this is what all the excitement is about. Accord, Camry, Altima, or this? I think a lot of enthusiasts would choose this car, based on its handling and drivetrain, though its “just a shade smaller” position vis-ŕ-vis the competitors might not work for some comparison shoppers. I’m guessing S means sport, given the wing, beefed-up door sills and flash-yellow paint. The exterior is a lot louder than the interior, though, where you need to eyeball the tach to see if the engine is running at idle, and the drivetrain doesn’t even make a lot of fuss up near redline. Zings right up there, though, delivering a strong dose of performance—after you get off the dime. First gear too tall? Car too new?

MORRISON: There certainly has been a lot of fuss about this car. I think that’s why I was slightly disappointed—at first. I expected it to come in more on the performance side of the equation, but undoubtedly it’s a nice car for the money. The performance isn’t at all bad; in fact, it’s darn good for this class. There’s something about the way it’s bolted together that makes me feel isolated from what’s going on between it and the road. I ran it to redline off the line a couple of times, and didn’t feel as though I was going anywhere. But when I looked at the speedo, I was doing 40-plus mph (this backs Kevin’s view of a long first gear). So the 6 gets up and goes, but it doesn’t get my adrenaline pumping.

MANDEL: Double-Stuffed Oreos vs. Vanilla Wafers. Freebird vs. anything by Yanni. Shabu-shabu vs. hotdogs. All of these are legitimate choices, and none of them are bad picks, but among them all is a decidedly flavorful option. So is the case of the Mazda 6 vs. Accord/Camry/Taurus/name other competitor here. Each car does its job well; one puts emphasis on doing it well with flair. The Mazda 6 is an entertaining driver in a fleet of capable cars, and that is the X-factor. Have your ginger-spiced carrot cake and eat it, too.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 0421dl1.jpeg (15.9 KB, 39 views)
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-21-2003, 22:19   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Stacy94PGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Hills of North Georgia,USA
Posts: 7,859
TheCarConnection
2003 Mazda6

Mazda pulls a fast one to draw attention to its spunky new Mazda6 mid-size sedan.
by Marc K. Stengel

Right off the bat, I gotta tell ya I'm all at sixes and sevens over this one. What I mean — and what "sixes and sevens" actually does mean in Brit-speak — is that I'm confused, perplexed, bewildered by Mazda's latest mid-size sedan.

Let's start with the name. At the risk of sounding self-centered and petulant, just how am I supposed to refer to this car: Is it the Mazda Mazda6, whereupon the surname is rushed and slurred into something like "Modzix"? Or do I simplify everything to "Mazda6" like some automotive Madonna or Cher or Sting? Or is "6" the surname? I just don't know; Mazda didn't include "nomenclature" in the index of the Mazda6 instruction manual. So I'm warning you off the top: Brace yourself for a lotta repetitive "Mazda" references in what follows.

On to weightier matters: Mazda's 2003 Mazda6 represents the sixth-generation of the Mazda mid-size sedan formerly known as 626. It is also the company's replacement for the nice-try-but-never-mind Millenia flagship sedan that tended toward luxury and sported offbeat Miller-cycle engine technology. The marriage of convenience that Mazda's marketing department has made renders Modzix the new flagship of the Mazda fleet — or, as the press release trumpets, "Mazda's finest flagship sedan!" Rather precocious for a car whose base prices range from just $19,000 to $21,000. (Where will the sporty, forthcoming Mazda RX-8 fit in, I wonder?)

Don't misconstrue my aforementioned quandaries for complaints. I've always been a Mazda aficionado--anyone who can build and sustain the Miata deserves heaps of praise. I am concerned about Mazda's positioning of the Mazda6 — hence the inner conflict of sixes and sevens. At the spec sheet level as much as in personal experience, what we have here is a jaunty, sporty sedan that's meant to muscle into the attention spans of shoppers eyeing Camrys, Accords and Tauruses. Will they notice the Mazda6? You betcha! It looks great. Will they take it seriously? I'm not really sure.

What concerns me is the Mazda6's apparent preoccupation with establishing a performance image. I love three-digit velocities as much as the next rash fool; but mid-size sedan buyers don't fall into that latter category very often. To replace a poor-selling 626 with a niche-market sedan aimed at performance-car wannabes looks like a roll of the dice to me. I hope those dice come up sixes, not seven.

Testy issues

For my tester, I drove a chrome yellow Mazda6 "S" version, which means it was equipped with a twin-cam 3.0-liter V6 using variable valve timing (VVT), all mated to a five-speed manual gearbox. Base price was a very attractive $21,100, which toted up quickly to $25,345, as-tested, after adding sporty options like 17-inch wheels, moonroof, leather seats and $450 worth of side and head-curtain airbags. A Mazda6 "i" version starts at $19,050 and sports a 2.3-liter twin-cam in-line four with VVT making 160 horsepower.

Mazda's Modzix S is very, very fun to drive, make no mistake about that. Its 220 hp may not be champs in its market category, but it doesn't miss by much; and when it's controlled by a decent manual five-speed, there's a lot of cut-and-thrust bravura inspired by this powertrain. The VVT set-up is key in this regard. Just the same, horsepower and torque (192 pound-feet) peak relatively high (6300 rpm and 5000 rpm, respectively), so it takes a bit of driver skill — or just plain attention — to keep gear and rpm relationships at optimum levels of the powerband.

A distinct powerband there is, however; and it's exceptionally exploitable thanks to Mazda6's sophisticated four-wheel-independent suspension. Double-wishbones up front and Mazda's proprietary "E-link" rear provide very precise handling control. Speed sensitive steering enhances the effect. Push the Mazda6 hard, it pushes back with taut reflexes. Back off in traffic, and the Mazda6 complies with pleasing but by no means softie ride quality.

Compact-ness

Much of the car's road dynamics stems from its compact dimensions. It's smaller in length, width and height than a Camry, for example; and its wheelbase is almost two important inches shorter. Racy styling exploits these dimensions and results in a very aggressive package that looks almost like a compact pocket-rocket. That, you see, is the crux of the issue. Nominally a five-seater, Mazda6 gives up space — and arguably comfort — in almost every aspect of its interior when compared with rivals like Camry and Accord. Out of eight different interior dimensions, Mazda6 is largest in only one — front hip room — and that by only 0.1 in. Otherwise, the Mazda is everywhere smaller, with front shoulder and rear shoulder/head/legroom dimensions suffering most.

Don't envision the Mazda6 as a cramped cubicle. Compared with Camry, the Accord is often smaller as well (albeit often larger than the Mazda6 and significantly cheaper as a base model). In terms of all-important perceptions, however, the Mazda6 looks, feels, is smaller; and in the cutthroat mid-size sedan category, engendering these perceptions may not be a case of best-foot-forward.

So it's back to the numerical quandary: Is Mazda's Mazda6 a big, moderately sporty compact sedan or a smallish, very sporty mid-size sedan? Six? Or Seven? Its distinctly European driving feel compares best with the pricier VW Passat; but Passat, too, is something of a niche-pleaser with, arguably, an ineffable German cachet that Mazda can't quite muster.

I'm rooting for Modzix, in any case. Its snappy looks suit my taste; its well conceived, airplane-cockpit interior suits my frame (5’ 6”, if you must know). I wish, in fact, I'd thought up Mazda's own tagline for 2003 — "Emotion in Motion" — because driving the Mazda6 is every bit an emotional thrill. I just hope it's also perceived as a solid, rational choice among very demanding buyers of mid-size cars — buyers who tend, by the way, to know their sixes from their sevens.

2003 Mazda6
Base price: $21,100; as tested, $25,345
Engine: 3.0-liter V-6, 220 hp/192 lb-ft
Drivetrain: Five-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Length x width x height (inches): 186.8 x 70.1 x 56.7 in
Wheelbase: 105.3 in
Curb weight: 2900 lb (est., V-6)
EPA City/Hwy: 20/27 mpg
Safety equipment: Driver and passenger front airbags; optional front side and side curtain airbags; four-wheel disc brakes with anti-lock control
Major standard equipment: Tilt/telescoping steering wheel, AM/FM stereo, flip/folding rear seat
Warranty: Three years/36,000 miles
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 6858_image.jpeg (20.6 KB, 22 views)
__________________
Stacy94PGT
My first car was a 67 Mustang Coupe, 2nd one was a 67 Cougar XR-7, 3rd one was a 66 Mustang Coupe. Why did I get rid of these cars for ? I know why, because I'm stupid, stupid, stupid.

My next Ford.....
Stacy94PGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Mazda Forum



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mazda MX Sportif Design Concept Hints at an All-New Mazda RPO83 Mazda Forum 2 03-04-2003 22:09
Preview: 2004 Mazda RX-8 Stacy94PGT Mazda Forum 2 11-16-2002 00:02
Mazda To Strengthen Domestic Dealer Network RPO83 Mazda Forum 0 10-31-2002 04:30
Ford Product-Led Transformation: 2003 RPO83 Trans | Driveline 0 07-22-2002 07:48
Mazda banking on use of Ford platforms to help ensure profits Stacy94PGT Mazda Forum 0 05-29-2002 09:37

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:08.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.