Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Sponsors
» Sponsors
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > Engine Specific Tech > 429-460 Tech
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2009, 08:52   #11 (permalink)
Moderator 429/460 Fanatic
 
Paul Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 494
cool Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronco Dave 79 View Post
I am rebuilding a 460 boat motor. It has Dove A block and Dove heads. Heads have adjustable rocker pedestals and some kind of dual valve springs with unknown aftermarket cam, and rail rockers. I would like to install a 218/228 (at 0.05) cam with .503 total lift. Will the rail rockers be OK? Note that max rpm w/ jet drive is around 4600 rpm, with rev limiter set at 5200.
So you have a D0VE-A block and heads, and somebody upgraded the valve train but kept the OEM iron rocker arms? In order for the rockers to be adustable, the studs should be 7/16" from top to bottom, not like the OEM studs with are 7/16" at the base but "neck down" to 3/8" toward the top (<---these are non-adjustable positive stop valve train parts).

Looks like you want to install a Summit 3501 camshaft. The OEM rockers can easily handle this cam....but we don't know what you have for springs OR what you currently have for a camshaft in your engine.

Paul
__________________

We're on the web; click below:
High Flow Dynamics
Performance Components for the 429/460 Engine Family
Paul Kane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-20-2009, 16:30   #12 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Thank you, Paul. If you are up for another question: will cast pistons be adequate for this build?
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 16:46   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Ahh. I see that I overlooked a detail. The rocker arms (railed) are not iron but cast aluminum. They are marked on top (on the flat zone above the push rod socket) G, and under the G the number 20 and the number 2. They are railed, and I had read that the Dove block was uniquely equipped with rail rockers, so just assumed they were original.

Other details about this engine are:
Windage tray and 12 qt. oil pan, maybe 1985 vintage
Crank appears to have been balanced
Double roller timing chain
One rod cap has been ground on, apparently to match weight with other rods? I will check weight
Cam unknown, but has mark on end "1058 M" (the cam and lifters look OK, so maybe this is a good cam. I would replace it just to be sure I have the right cam in the rebuild)

The entire engine appears to have maybe 100 hours or less. I tore it down because water entered cylinders 4 and 7 (improper winter storage). Everything inside is incredibly clean - except of course 2 rusty cylinders. BUT: the bigger problem is cylinder #1, which has a major beat-out area near the top of the cylinder. That piston had a broken ring - but no wear or marks on the piston or ring. I suspect that a previous build suffered the broken ring, and someone tried to fix without boring #1. Anyhow, all being bored now and we'll start over with a fresh motor!
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 19:40   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Well, I thought they were aluminum. But actually they may be a bit heavy for aluminum. Were the original rocker arms cast steel?
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2009, 20:26   #15 (permalink)
Moderator 429/460 Fanatic
 
Paul Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 494
cool Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Dave,

The OEM rockers are cast iron.

Based on your most recent posts, now looks like you have a rebuilt engine that has a number of aftermarket parts in it.

Since you engine is completely apart, will be getting rebuilt, and will be seeing marine service, I think you shoudl look to forged pistons instead of the cast ones. With a proper bore clearance the cast pistons will likely be okay to your 5000 peak rpm, but 5000 sustained is a lot to them and you don't know their overall history and you are rebuilding anyway. I cannot tell you what brand rocker arms you have based on your description, but a picture could certainly help. It sounds as though the roataing assembly has been balanced, but with new pistons a re-balance is in order. And without knowing what your cam profile is, we cannot be certain whether the Summit 3501 cam is a performance upgrade or if you are stepping down to a smaller cam, in effect.

Also, maybe you can tell me what kind of boat you have and what you want for engine power and I can give you some suggests for a combination.

Paul
__________________

We're on the web; click below:
High Flow Dynamics
Performance Components for the 429/460 Engine Family
Paul Kane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2009, 08:11   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Its been a while, but we ended up doing a lot more to that motor than I had originally hoped. Replaced entire valve train, still based on the Summit cam, but new everything else: Comp Magnum (roller tip) rockers, guideplates, better guides, etc. 0.60 overbore necessary to remove cylinder wall damage (from previous broken ring), hypereutectic pistons, rebalance. The machine shop (Boise Cylinder Head - they are good) noted much evidence of detonation, and was concerned about putting it back together with the re******t 9:8 compression ratio. I promised to run premium and maximum 30 degrees advance.

I brought the long block home and began reassembly. Freshened all components. Starters were ugly as expected. But the big discovery was with the distributor. I think I found the "smoking gun" on the 460. That engine had clearly been detonating for a long time. The reason is that it was running total timing advance of 42 degrees. That happened because the initial setting was 6 degrees BTDC, and the centrifugal advance added 36 degrees. When I checked the centrifugal advance I noticed that it was set on the "18" slot instead of the "13" slot. The 13 slot would give centrifugal advance of 26 degrees, plus 6 initial making 32 degrees total advance – OK for a 460. But 42 would, and did, kill the engine. I will change to a 4 degree initial advance for a total of 30 degrees, and hope that makes for a more durable, happier engine.
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 15:10   #17 (permalink)
Moderator 429/460 Fanatic
 
Paul Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 494
cool Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Great observation on the distributor! DO NOT allow those hypereutectic pistons see any detonation, they really don;t like it. For the price, another $50 would have got you forged. Just keep spark advance where you noted and jet a little on the rich side...meaning do plug readings and make sure you are not lean, and you'll be fine.

Paul
__________________

We're on the web; click below:
High Flow Dynamics
Performance Components for the 429/460 Engine Family
Paul Kane is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 16:31   #18 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

Thanks for your help, Paul
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2009, 17:08   #19 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 8
Re: 460 Rocker Arms

A while back you asked about the boat. This engine goes into a 24' aluminum hulled jet boat, a river boat (guide boat actually) built in 1978 by Holaday in Meridian, ID. It is a mild V, about 8 degrees, and 6 feet wide at the bottom. The boat was originally built with a 350 Chev, but swapped to the 460 with a Hamilton pump. It planes at a low speed and lifts the bow beautifully for big river waves. I have taken it completely apart, replaced windshield and added hard top and windows. It sat in the boatyard 3 years during the windshield/top surgery - part of the problem. As I put it back together I will set it up as a camper (in the cabin) for two persons, with a large flat deck over the motor. I suspect this hull is very light in weight. Even with a motor that could not possibly have run very well (and a gigantic albatross of a zodiac strapped on top) it made 42 mph at 4300 rpm. Don't know how to insert a picture.

Actually, I just put a picture in my profile.
Bronco Dave 79 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > The Garage - Tech Forums > Engine Specific Tech > 429-460 Tech




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2