Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > alt.autos.ford
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

ยป Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

» Auto Resources
Search for Ford Rebates and Ford cars for sale such as Ford F150, Ford Ranger and many other new Ford trucks.
Sponsors

» Sponsor Links
»Garage Storage and Cabinets
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #61 (permalink)
dizzy
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:15:44 -0800, JayR wrote:

> $65K... HAHA That's with EVERYTHING included into an estimated salaried
> number, guy I USED to WORK for GM in a factory... and I'm telling you
> from the horses MOUTH, ONLY the people that have been working there for
> over 20+ YEARS make anywhere from 40-50K/yr and many of them that's
> with TONS of overtime. $65K is an estimate with the WHOLE healthcare,
> pension plain accounted for!


Thank you for setting the record straight.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #62 (permalink)
Learning Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


Sean Elkins wrote:
> In article <1138197244.456346.93500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 65,000 a year should be minimum wage in the usa. That would be $32.50
> > an hour.
> >
> > taken a look at your electric bill lately?

>
> You know Richard, there are times when I read some of your posts and
> almost see a glimmer of rationality in them----> then you go and reset
> yourself to zero by posting something as complete insane as this.


Think outside of the box and soundbyte-based-groupthink Republicans are
famous for. Use your noggin.

I never said it was reasonable in practice, I used 'should'. In order
for that to work we'd have to stop relying on middle eastern oil and
asian slave labor. But free-trade-pact happy, greedy, fat, crooked
Republicans will have none of that.


>
> Do you understand nothing of basic economics?


I understand basic fascism as well.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #63 (permalink)
Learning Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


dizzy wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:10 -0800, jismquiff wrote:
>
> > Stop and think. We're told this week that the average annual wage for
> > a Ford family production line worker is an astounding $65,000!

>
> Nonsense. Their "wage" is not NEARLY that high. I could believe the
> total cost to employ the person might be something like that...


overtime

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #64 (permalink)
Learning Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


Learning Richard wrote:
> dizzy wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:10 -0800, jismquiff wrote:
> >
> > > Stop and think. We're told this week that the average annual wage for
> > > a Ford family production line worker is an astounding $65,000!

> >
> > Nonsense. Their "wage" is not NEARLY that high. I could believe the
> > total cost to employ the person might be something like that...

>
> overtime


Then again, someone _did_ set the record straight. The figure includes
a helluva lot more than takehome pay. I'd say its just about enough to
give a working American a quality of life that is worth living.

Republicans... jesus christ. First they bitch about welfare and
entitlement programs (which make up a tiny portion of the federal
budget), then they bitch because some folks actually make enough money
to put food on the table and pay their bills.

I say send all the Republican ****wads over to Iraq to fight their war.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #65 (permalink)
dizzy
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!

Top posting troll Mike Hunter wrote:

> That may be their editorial opinion but you can't prove it by me. The
> buying public is who make the ultimate decision as to which is better, when
> they buy what they buy.


In your other post, you complain that Americans buy foreign cars
that they perceive to be a better value. Idiot.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 19:01   #66 (permalink)
badgolferman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!

Learning Richard, 1/25/2006,8:08:13 PM, wrote:

>
> dizzy wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:26:12 -0500, Franky Furter wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmmm...isnt $65k about the average wage in America nowadays?

> >
> > No surprise that a top poster would say something as stupid as
> > that. The average wage is close to $40k.

>
> true.
>
> >
> > > If you are
> > > making under $50k with 3 kids you are at the poverty level.

> >
> > Wrong again.

>
> not true. Try raising even one kid on 50k. Almost impossible without
> those dreaded entitlement programs.


That depends where you live. I support a wife and two kids, albeit we
sacrifice many things, and I am below your threshold.

--
"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the
support of Paul." ~ George Bernard Shaw
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 20:01   #67 (permalink)
badgolferman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!

Learning Richard, 1/25/2006,8:12:11 PM, wrote:

>
> Sean Elkins wrote:
> > In article <1138197244.456346.93500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 65,000 a year should be minimum wage in the usa. That would be
> > > $32.50 an hour.
> > >
> > > taken a look at your electric bill lately?

> >
> > You know Richard, there are times when I read some of your posts and
> > almost see a glimmer of rationality in them----> then you go and
> > reset yourself to zero by posting something as complete insane as
> > this.

>
> Think outside of the box and soundbyte-based-groupthink Republicans
> are famous for. Use your noggin.
>
> I never said it was reasonable in practice, I used 'should'. In order
> for that to work we'd have to stop relying on middle eastern oil and
> asian slave labor. But free-trade-pact happy, greedy, fat, crooked
> Republicans will have none of that.
> >
> > Do you understand nothing of basic economics?

>
> I understand basic fascism as well.



We have just been subjected to back-pedaling and changing the subject.
Two of Learning Richard's stronger characteristics.

--
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy." ~ Winston Churchill
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 20:01   #68 (permalink)
Learning Richard
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


badgolferman wrote:
> Learning Richard, 1/25/2006,8:12:11 PM, wrote:
>
> >
> > Sean Elkins wrote:
> > > In article <1138197244.456346.93500@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > > "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 65,000 a year should be minimum wage in the usa. That would be
> > > > $32.50 an hour.
> > > >
> > > > taken a look at your electric bill lately?
> > >
> > > You know Richard, there are times when I read some of your posts and
> > > almost see a glimmer of rationality in them----> then you go and
> > > reset yourself to zero by posting something as complete insane as
> > > this.

> >
> > Think outside of the box and soundbyte-based-groupthink Republicans
> > are famous for. Use your noggin.
> >
> > I never said it was reasonable in practice, I used 'should'. In order
> > for that to work we'd have to stop relying on middle eastern oil and
> > asian slave labor. But free-trade-pact happy, greedy, fat, crooked
> > Republicans will have none of that.
> > >
> > > Do you understand nothing of basic economics?

> >
> > I understand basic fascism as well.

>
>
> We have just been subjected to back-pedaling and changing the subject.
> Two of Learning Richard's stronger characteristics.


Are personal attacks your way of making up for a small penis or what?

You're a fascist. That's something you WON'T backpedal on. Your poor
poor children -- raised in an atmosphere of caste and fear. :(

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 20:01   #69 (permalink)
Franky Furter
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


"Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote in message
news:11tf2t8oik7eie1@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Franky Furter" <Frank@furter.com> wrote in message
> news:11tdld4c1mped13@corp.supernews.com...
> > Y'all gots to remember that GM Ford and Chrys. can not import there

cars
> > like the Japanese import cars to the US, so its really an uneven

trade.
> > And its also the old saying someone elses Ice is always colder.
> > The people in the US will sell out to any body given the opportunity to
> > either save a buck or to keep up with the jones's and about 20 years

ago
> > the Jones's bought a Japanese car.

>
> Actually Ford was profitable in Europe and Asia - it lost money in the US.
> So it exports and makes money there. Just not here.
>
>

Yes but they export nowhere near what the japanese export because of
tariffs. Its really an uneven playing field.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 20:01   #70 (permalink)
Dan J.S.
 
Posts: n/a
Re: $65,000 A Year? Bye, U.S. Auto Workers!


"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1138238444.600973.19820@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Learning Richard wrote:
>> dizzy wrote:
>> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:10 -0800, jismquiff wrote:
>> >
>> > > Stop and think. We're told this week that the average annual wage
>> > > for
>> > > a Ford family production line worker is an astounding $65,000!
>> >
>> > Nonsense. Their "wage" is not NEARLY that high. I could believe the
>> > total cost to employ the person might be something like that...

>>
>> overtime

>
> Then again, someone _did_ set the record straight. The figure includes
> a helluva lot more than takehome pay. I'd say its just about enough to
> give a working American a quality of life that is worth living.
>
> Republicans... jesus christ. First they bitch about welfare and
> entitlement programs (which make up a tiny portion of the federal
> budget), then they bitch because some folks actually make enough money
> to put food on the table and pay their bills.
>
> I say send all the Republican ****wads over to Iraq to fight their war.
>


aggressive democrat lead unions is what is causing these companies to go
under...


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > alt.autos.ford



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:08.

Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0