Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > alt.autos.ford
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

» Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2006, 20:01   #31 (permalink)
Bret Ludwig
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?


Steve W. wrote:

<<snip>>

> > no mechanical connection between the fuel burning engine and the drive
> > wheels. Trains have been built with such a powertrain for decades,

> and
> > AFAIK, none use a turbine engine. GE locomotives has made a bunch of
> > these trains and GE is also a top builder of turbine/jet engines, so I
> > bet they have looked at it in depth.

>
> Actually there have been a few turbine powered locomotive engines have
> been tried. The problem was and still is fuel consumption. Turbines of
> ANY size use LOT's of fuel rapidly. There have also been a few turbine
> powered autos built. They were dropped for two reasons, cost of
> production and fuel use. There are also turbine powered motorcycles. Jay
> Leno owns one and was telling on a show the other night that it is a
> very difficult bike to get used to ride since the turbine has a very
> high lag on both ends.


What Jay Leno and a couple of other people have is a crude homemade
motorcycle built around a surplus Allison turboshaft engine. Such
things are very different than purpose-built automotive gas turbines
which are relatively inexpensive to produce and designed to recover
much of the wate heat via regeneration.

Several companies built prototype automotive gas turbines but none
were ever sold.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-25-2006, 07:01   #32 (permalink)
Frank from Deeeetroit
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?

Sirius radio.


"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mwyBf.32197$RK3.22192@trnddc06...
> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>> "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Anything developed for, or primarily intended for sale to the DOD is
>>>going to be so overpriced due to contractor spoilage as to not be
>>>worth considering.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>
>> Yeah.... like all that technology developed under NASA/ Space funding..
>> total waste of money, considering we never saw any of it!
>>
>> Good Catch!
>>

>
>
> Yeah, just cable television (all of which uses commerical satellite
> content), weather satellites, GPS navigation, XM radio, the Internet and a
> huge amount of solar cell research and production. Damn NASA and the
> military :).
>
> John



 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 07:01   #33 (permalink)
Frank from Deeeetroit
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?

True, because of the need of a quality item in a short amount of time.


"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:eImcnZkxkfEvIkveUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Nearly anything you can name was either developed or vastly improved by
> the needs of war, include the space program itself.
>
>
> mike hunt
>
> .
> "John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:UCyBf.32199$RK3.23994@trnddc06...
>> Backyard Mechanic wrote:
>>
>>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ogy/2002754224
>>> _boeingitar22.html
>>>
>>> Copy and paste both lines.
>>>
>>> Carbon fiber technology developed for steath bomber, used in commercial
>>> aircraft. The issue: military secret or not?
>>>
>>> Whatever the case, not only is the market global, but also the product
>>> and manufacturing source.
>>>
>>>
>>> No... it isnt as easy as just keeping it to ourselves... in the
>>> competitive market, it goes both ways. The alternative is that, if you
>>> DO attempt to keep such close to the vest, some politico just deals it
>>> away without thinking, in return for campaign contributions. See:
>>> Clinton Campaign/China - Missile guidance systems scandal.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> Personally I think that Boeing is making a mistake by outsourcing so much
>> of the 787 development and manufacturing. Boeing is putting know-how
>> into the hands of it's future competitors. Boeing saves some money today
>> but takes away from it's own long term value.
>>
>> The government wasn't concerned about Boeing using the military
>> technology to build commerical products, it was concerned about giving
>> that technology away to foreign based companies. Since the US taxpayers
>> funded the carbon fiber R&D there are good arguments for not giving the
>> technology away.
>>
>> John

>
>



 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 21:01   #34 (permalink)
Bret Ludwig
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?


EatMe wrote:
> >>Some of the tooling still

> exists, none of it was terribly expensive to build (except for
> accounting purposes)<<
>
> And the liability insurance. Or is that free nowadays?


For a company the size of Northrop Grumman it's a necessary business
expense, one they already carry because they have a substantial "tail",
and a small part of the cost.

Hard estimates are tough to pin down because companies do not disclose
their actual premiums, and many payouts go unreported in the press.
However, it's very certain that product liability premiums have far
more to do with the rate of return reinsurors can earn on capital than
with the day-to-day likelihood of big judgments. GAMA wheedled the
General Aviation Tort Reform Act and a Bonanza has since went from
being a $350K to a $750K airplane-with no changes, no new technology,
and a DECLINE in labor costs! Raytheon has laid off many senior rivet
pounders and replaced them with younger, cheaper ones with lowered
health coverage. You didn't notice, son of whore Richard Collins didn't
tell you, of course.

Requiring reporting requirements to make it possible to publish, with
certainty, just how much companies ARE paying in premiums should have
been part of GATRA. It wasn't.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 08:01   #35 (permalink)
Olaf
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?


"TheSnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:CW4Bf.4161$rH5.3472@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Al Bundy wrote:
>> John Horner wrote:
>>
>>>Al Bundy wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Electric motors develop maximum torque at zero rpm......."
>>>>
>>>>Is that so?
>>>>Unfortunately Nomen, you are a poser, just cutting and pasting things
>>>>you read. That leaves you making error after error in how things are or
>>>>could be.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Well Mr. Bundy, I am afraid that Nomen is correct, at least for
>>>permanent magnet electric motors. Have a look at:
>>>
>>>http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/~j...-71.html#54931
>>>
>>>John

>>
>>
>> Well John, you are wrong because you took a blanket statement and
>> qualified it to suit your answer. Again, nice pasting job though.
>>

>
>
> There are a LOT of varibles in electric motor design that can effect at
> what RPM peak effort is achieved. Generally though with traction type
> motors used to power electric cars and such, they achive maximum torque at
> zero or very low RPMs to get the load moving.
>
> --
>
> -----------------
> www.thesnoman.com


I think I may see where Mr. Bundy is saying. Without having read any of the
links provided, it makes sense to me that at zero RPM the motor is putting
out zero torque. Once any torque great enough to make the motor turn is
applied, then the RPM is no longer zero.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 08:01   #36 (permalink)
Olaf
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?


"Lynn McGuire" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:11tag9v45dlo4e4@corp.supernews.com...
>> Yeah.... like all that technology developed under NASA/ Space funding..
>> total waste of money, considering we never saw any of it!
>>
>> Good Catch!

>
> What about velcro ? High impact plastic ? Fuel Cells ? GPS ?
> Satellite TV and Radio ?
>
> Lynn
>
>


Don't forget Teflon!


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 15:01   #37 (permalink)
Steve
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?

Olaf wrote:
> "TheSnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:CW4Bf.4161$rH5.3472@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
>>Al Bundy wrote:
>>
>>>John Horner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Al Bundy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"Electric motors develop maximum torque at zero rpm......."
>>>>>
>>>>>Is that so?
>>>>>Unfortunately Nomen, you are a poser, just cutting and pasting things
>>>>>you read. That leaves you making error after error in how things are or
>>>>>could be.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Well Mr. Bundy, I am afraid that Nomen is correct, at least for
>>>>permanent magnet electric motors. Have a look at:
>>>>
>>>>http://claymore.engineer.gvsu.edu/~j...-71.html#54931
>>>>
>>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>>Well John, you are wrong because you took a blanket statement and
>>>qualified it to suit your answer. Again, nice pasting job though.
>>>

>>
>>
>>There are a LOT of varibles in electric motor design that can effect at
>>what RPM peak effort is achieved. Generally though with traction type
>>motors used to power electric cars and such, they achive maximum torque at
>>zero or very low RPMs to get the load moving.
>>
>>--
>>
>>-----------------
>>www.thesnoman.com

>
>
> I think I may see where Mr. Bundy is saying. Without having read any of the
> links provided, it makes sense to me that at zero RPM the motor is putting
> out zero torque. Once any torque great enough to make the motor turn is
> applied, then the RPM is no longer zero.


What batshit!

If electric motors put out *zero* torque at zero RPM, they'd never begin
to rotate at all. Internal combustion engines DO have zero torque at
zero RPM, which is exactly why you need an electric motor to start them!

How much torque an electric motor does put out vs. RPM depends a lot on
the design of the motor.

DC and AC/DC commutator motors put out their maximum torque at 0 RPM
(but will burn out if held at 0 RPM because only one winding on the
armature is carrying the full load). An example of a DC commutator motor
is the starter motor in a car, or the traction motors in older
locomotives. An AC/DC commutator motor is the type used in vacuum
cleaners, hand power tools, and blenders.

AC induction motors put out their peak torque at a few percent less than
their free running maximum RPM. As you lug them down, torque goes up at
first, but lug them too far and torque begins to decline again, but it
never drops to zero even at zero RPM. An example of an AC induction
motor is a fan motor, AC blower motor, AC compressor motor, or shop air
compressor motor. The most commonly used AC motors in the world.

AC Synchronous motors put out their maximum torque at the synchronous
RPM. They're used in heavy industry because they can be set to run at
leading power factor to compensate for induction motors that run at a
lagging power factor- save's the industry money overall.

Variable-frequency drive motors are induction or synchronous motors
driven by a variable frequency AC source, so that you can make them put
out peak torque at any RPM you want. Modern AC locomotive traction
motors are variable-frequency drive motors.

But regardless of the type, ANY self-starting electric motor puts out
SOME torque at 0 RPM. An example of a non-self-starting type would be a
synchrounous motor without any start/damper windings... but that's a
laboratory curiousity as all real-world electric motors have a provision
to give them self-starting torque.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 21:01   #38 (permalink)
Marcus
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?

I think I remember reading about lots of other issues, too.

There's a massive amount of airflow which all needs to be very well
filtered -- I think the Chrysler turbine cars were needing the filters
cleaned daily? Of course that's old technology but you'd still have the
same basic problem to deal with and probably would still have very frequent
filter replacement or maintenance. To say nothing of the replacement cost
of Nomen's "HEPA" filters. That'd be one helluva HEPA filter for a turbine
engine's airflow.

I think there was a problem with extremely high exhaust temperatures as
well? There are ways to reduce that, of course, but it would probably still
be a problem.

I think there'd be enormous investment of research dollars with very dubious
returns on practical usefulness, and not very likely to see a great
advantage even over conventional automotive hybrids.

I often wonder about using smaller engines with higher-pressure
turbochargers as a low-cost way to raise fuel economy. Perhaps a modern
1-liter or 1.5-liter with a high-pressure turbo instead of a big V6? (Just
a thought, not trying to hijack the thread...)

"John Horner" <jthorner@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:huWAf.6824$Me5.2114@trnddc05...
> Gas turbine engines are very expensive to build. I doubt that we will
> ever see significant application to automobiles. It has been tried, many
> times, and came up short.
>
> John
>



 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:01   #39 (permalink)
Bill Putney
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?

Olaf wrote:

>
> Don't forget Teflon!


I thought Teflon™ was a happy accident that resulted from a tank car
load of whatever the chemical is being lift sitting too long - not a
result of any intentional development.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2006, 10:01   #40 (permalink)
Berkshire Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Gas turbine/electric hybrid?


"Bill Putney" <bptn@kinez.net> wrote in message
news:drg5g4$o72$1@news.isdn.net...
> Olaf wrote:
>
>>
>> Don't forget Teflon!

>
> I thought Teflon™ was a happy accident that resulted from a tank car load
> of whatever the chemical is being lift sitting too long - not a result of
> any intentional development.
>
> Bill Putney
> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address
> with the letter 'x')


And now, the rest of the story. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teflon

Bill K.


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > alt.autos.ford



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 22:55.

Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0