Re: Guess you win Hurc...
"No body" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:02:10 GMT, msterspy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>But you are a real looser
>>Hey Hurc: I have decided to blow off this newsgroup because I'm tired
>>of viewing your posts. You think 911 was a blast? You are a real piece
>>of shit. Keep it up, you will eventually pay for your remarks. There
>>are a lot of angry "yankees" who will eventually find you. Believe
>>me, that will be an unpleasant meeting for you.
>>Anyone who feels that the death of innocent poeple is somehow amusing
>>or justified could be viewd as a psyco and probably should be
>>monitored by athorities.
>>Good bye to members of alt.autos.ford. Hope you are all more
>>tolerant of shit for brains HURC.
> There was once a saying something along the lines of "don't get into a
> disagreement with a moron, they'll only drag you down to their level
> and then beat you with their extensive experience".
> Or something like that
Hey, what dipshit was trying to say, (not that I have seen the original
post), is that, (if he had a brain), for example, that in 1943 the Allies
started firebombing German cities, with the rationale that the workers and
corporations contributed to German military power, and that you could break
the will of a population to fight by targeting civilians. This was basically
proven wrong on both accounts in WWII, much like it was proven wrong again
(somewhat by the US in Vietnam and again) by the Osama boys post 9-11. What
the ****-up is trying to say, provided he had the intelligence and education
to know this - which he doesn't - is that in "total" war, civilians are
legitimate targets. The US may not see 9-11 as total war, but its enemies
There you go ****nuts, I actually explained something on your behalf, as you
are too stupid to know or verbalize it.