fred@usenet.com

On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:21:31 GMT, "Jim Warman"
<mechanic@tenalpsulet.net> wrote:

>Well, Steve... it does and it doesn't.... I like to mark the shaft just so I
>am 100% sure that I don't introduce a new vibration to the car upon
>reassembly. Do I occasionally forget for some unexplainable reason... yes.
>In some cases, it may make a difference but I haven't had any concerns
>generated as a reult of driveshaft indexing.
>
you always index
lmfao
i thought you were LICENCED
**** man
a driveshaft that falls off from a intoduced vibration can
KILL
you ****ing tard
ther is NO EXCUSE
pull your ticket
this is forwarded to alberta labor
I hope they revoke your ticket
>To make a long story short.... We should try to index the driveshaft
>correctly. If we pay attention to the "shadow" on the pinion flange, we have
>a 50% chance of being right on reassembly. I haven't seen indexing make a
>noticeable difference yet. But, I can see rotating assemblies getting
>lighter yet in the future.... As the mass gets smaller, small imbalances
>will have a greater effect so indexing is still a good habit to get into.
>

what the **** is a shadow
is that a hick town term?

as for habit
lmfao
U ALWAYS INDEX
lmfao
its not just a good habit ****head
i wonder how many chug wagons in slave lake
u ****ed up



>In your case, pay attention to the shadow when you re-install... if you feel
>there is a vibrationconcern, turn the shaft 180 on the flange and try it
>like that.
>
>HTH.

MasterBlaster

<fred@usenet.com>.........

aka barney rubble <hurricane@asypost.com>
aka president bush <hurricane@twocanchew.com>
aka wilma <hurricane@ucancom.com>
aka acheam acheam <hurricane@ezpost.com>
aka achmeed_achmead@tewe.com
aka allotavagina@ eee zee post
aka babe ruth
aka bert@yellowstone_.com
aka b_black@_jtec.com
aka dave_@hotmail.com
aka dw
aka ed@hotmail_.com
aka ewe@me.com
aka fredo (fredf@hotmail_.com)
aka fref@_abc.com
aka fordly
aka <fordly@hotmail.com>
aka fred flintstone <hurricane@asylumcom>
aka greg (greg@hotmail_.com)
aka george (ricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com)
aka hank arron (ricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com
aka Hanson5619 (hanson5619@aol.com)
aka home@home.com
aka hurricane_ast@hotmail
aka ivan from canmore@ nbc.com
aka lee
aka mark welschbyte-me@ nbc.com
aka me@_home_.com
aka mechanixx@_hotmail_.com
aka mike sinclair (msinclair@nerdshive.com)
aka minimee@ ezzzzzzpost.com
aka Monica Lewinski
aka quality_joba1@hotmail.com
aka pmike
aka rmike
aka robert@yellowstone_.com
aka sam@marlin.com
aka Sk8er boy 765575 (sk8erboy765575@aol.com)
aka simpsone@newark.com
aka sw (urricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com)
aka uncle_saddam@tus.com
aka urri (urri)
aka you_@_me_.com
aka relic896@hotmail.com
aka fordly863@hotmail.com

....wrote:

> i thought you were LICENCED

He has a Blue Walrus. Much better than some crappy Red Seal.

> **** man

Does that mean you're taking Tom up on his offer?

> >To make a long story short.... We should try to index the driveshaft
> >correctly. If we pay attention to the "shadow" on the pinion flange, we have
> >a 50% chance of being right on reassembly.

> what the **** is a shadow

You can't figure it out? What a hack.

Look at the pinion flange where the driveshaft was bolted on.
See the nice clean outline inside the exposed dirty area?
Looks kinda like a "shadow" of the driveshaft's flange, doesn't it?

> U ALWAYS INDEX

Always?
Even if you're replacing both u-joints?
Or the pinion flange?
Or the driveshaft?
Or the rear driveshaft flange?
How about if you're replacing the entire rear end?

pick one

"MasterBlaster" <Nobody's.Home@My.Place> wrote in message
news:X4CXd.12718$i6.7271@edtnps90...
>
> <fred@usenet.com>.........
>
> aka barney rubble <hurricane@asypost.com>
> aka president bush <hurricane@twocanchew.com>
> aka wilma <hurricane@ucancom.com>
> aka acheam acheam <hurricane@ezpost.com>
> aka achmeed_achmead@tewe.com
> aka allotavagina@ eee zee post
> aka babe ruth
> aka bert@yellowstone_.com
> aka b_black@_jtec.com
> aka dave_@hotmail.com
> aka dw
> aka ed@hotmail_.com
> aka ewe@me.com
> aka fredo (fredf@hotmail_.com)
> aka fref@_abc.com
> aka fordly
> aka <fordly@hotmail.com>
> aka fred flintstone <hurricane@asylumcom>
> aka greg (greg@hotmail_.com)
> aka george (ricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com)
> aka hank arron (ricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com
> aka Hanson5619 (hanson5619@aol.com)
> aka home@home.com
> aka hurricane_ast@hotmail
> aka ivan from canmore@ nbc.com
> aka lee
> aka mark welschbyte-me@ nbc.com
> aka me@_home_.com
> aka mechanixx@_hotmail_.com
> aka mike sinclair (msinclair@nerdshive.com)
> aka minimee@ ezzzzzzpost.com
> aka Monica Lewinski
> aka quality_joba1@hotmail.com
> aka pmike
> aka rmike
> aka robert@yellowstone_.com
> aka sam@marlin.com
> aka Sk8er boy 765575 (sk8erboy765575@aol.com)
> aka simpsone@newark.com
> aka sw (urricane@ezzzzzzzpost.com)
> aka uncle_saddam@tus.com
> aka urri (urri)
> aka you_@_me_.com
> aka relic896@hotmail.com
> aka fordly863@hotmail.com
>
> ...wrote:
>
>> i thought you were LICENCED
>
> He has a Blue Walrus. Much better than some crappy Red Seal.
>
>> **** man
>
> Does that mean you're taking Tom up on his offer?
>
>> >To make a long story short.... We should try to index the driveshaft
>> >correctly. If we pay attention to the "shadow" on the pinion flange, we have
>> >a 50% chance of being right on reassembly.
>
>> what the **** is a shadow
>
> You can't figure it out? What a hack.
>
> Look at the pinion flange where the driveshaft was bolted on.
> See the nice clean outline inside the exposed dirty area?
> Looks kinda like a "shadow" of the driveshaft's flange, doesn't it?
>
>> U ALWAYS INDEX
>
> Always?
> Even if you're replacing both u-joints?
> Or the pinion flange?
> Or the driveshaft?
> Or the rear driveshaft flange?
> How about if you're replacing the entire rear end?
>
Apparently "collage boy" does. He was asked that question before as how to
reassemble the pinion as per Ford's shop manual ( he claims to be a master, so
he would quite obliviously follow the shop manual too a tee ). He said to index
the pinion nut. The shop manual says to throw away the pinion nut.