aarcuda69062

In article <olr721t6pfppu7u6c9tiunoe3tss5534bk@4ax.com>,
fordly863@hotmail.com wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 10:03:26 -0500, nonelson@execpc.com (Neil Nelson)
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> >Time is never expressed in degrees nor percent.
> >
> >Must be hurryboobs new laws of physics.
>
> lmfao
>
> http://www.sunlitdesign.com/infosearch/equivalence.htm

So, if you show up late for work, your boss will ask why you
punched in 1 degree late. Uh-huh.
Not too swift, are you? [rhetorical question]

>
> bwhahahahaha
> nelson is it 1932 yet

Umm... according to this latest revelation, (the one that only
took you 21 months to dig up), you should be expressing that date
in degrees of rotation. (you didn't)
Chalk up another failure for Bozo the bitch.

****ing amateur.

Eric Toline

another nelson classic

Group: alt.autos.ford Date: Tue, Mar 1, 2005, 4:33am (EST+5) From:
fordly863@hotmail.com
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 10:03:26 -0500, nonelson@execpc.com (Neil Nelson)
wrote:
Time is never expressed in degrees nor percent.
Must be hurryboobs new laws of physics.

lmfao
http://www.sunlitdesign.com/infosearch/equivalence.htm
bwhahahahaha
nelson is it 1932 yet<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

So if someone says it's 158.50 degrees you'll know the correct time?

Eric