fordly863@hotmail.com

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:33:09 GMT, "Jim Warman"
<mechanic@tenalpsulet.net> wrote:

>
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>Calculus is beyond both of us.... Complete the circuit or the ignition
>coil... current starts to flow and a magnetic field builds.... as the lines
>of magnetic foce expand across the cunductor coil, back emf is induced and
>we experience reactance. Is it intended? No.... Does it happen? Yes..... Is
>this an AC circuit? No, polarity has not changed, it is indeed a DC
>circuit - a pulsating DC circuit, but a DC circuit none-the-less. And the
>only formulae you can come up with are cut and paste from electronic web
>sites....
>
where show your math
lmfao



>Reactance can be associated with a moving magnetic field..... it is
>impedance without resistance. You need to be able to think in terms of cause
>and effect.

lmfao
just show your math

>The modern automobile has many instances of frequency without polarity
>change.... but then you knw that and merely forgot for a few moments, right?

again just show your math
>Surprisingly, blissful ignorance shouldn't be thought of as brilliance. You
>constantly assert that I have something to prove to you and you avoid, time
>and again, ever offering up any proof that you have the foggiest idea what
>it is you are talking about. I suggest that you might lead a more
>fullfilling life if you were the least bit helpful.
>

and your advice will get me to SL FORD rite
lmfao
no thanks

hurc ast
>And that's Mr. Warman to you, cretin.
>

Jim Warman

x-no-archive: yes

Calculus is beyond both of us.... Complete the circuit or the ignition
coil... current starts to flow and a magnetic field builds.... as the lines
of magnetic foce expand across the cunductor coil, back emf is induced and
we experience reactance. Is it intended? No.... Does it happen? Yes..... Is
this an AC circuit? No, polarity has not changed, it is indeed a DC
circuit - a pulsating DC circuit, but a DC circuit none-the-less. And the
only formulae you can come up with are cut and paste from electronic web
sites....

Reactance can be associated with a moving magnetic field..... it is
impedance without resistance. You need to be able to think in terms of cause
and effect.

The modern automobile has many instances of frequency without polarity
change.... but then you knw that and merely forgot for a few moments, right?

Surprisingly, blissful ignorance shouldn't be thought of as brilliance. You
constantly assert that I have something to prove to you and you avoid, time
and again, ever offering up any proof that you have the foggiest idea what
it is you are talking about. I suggest that you might lead a more
fullfilling life if you were the least bit helpful.

And that's Mr. Warman to you, cretin.

Jim Warman

x-no-archive: yes

Well, he's finally switched the target of his racial slurs to something a
little closer to home..... his mommy must be proud...

nospam.clare.nce@sny.der.on.ca

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:33:09 GMT, "Jim Warman"
<mechanic@tenalpsulet.net> wrote:

>
>x-no-archive: yes
>
>Calculus is beyond both of us.... Complete the circuit or the ignition
>coil... current starts to flow and a magnetic field builds.... as the lines
>of magnetic foce expand across the cunductor coil, back emf is induced and
>we experience reactance. Is it intended? No.... Does it happen? Yes..... Is
>this an AC circuit? No, polarity has not changed, it is indeed a DC
>circuit - a pulsating DC circuit, but a DC circuit none-the-less. And the
>only formulae you can come up with are cut and paste from electronic web
>sites....
>
>Reactance can be associated with a moving magnetic field..... it is
>impedance without resistance. You need to be able to think in terms of cause
>and effect.
>
>The modern automobile has many instances of frequency without polarity
>change.... but then you knw that and merely forgot for a few moments, right?

Actually, it is really easy to work with "non alternating AC" All you
do is change your Zero reference and it is simple AC. Offset your zero
by 1/2 the peak to peak voltage, and treat it as AC. If it has a high
reactance, it approxemates a sine wave. If it has low reactance it is
more of a square wave, with fast rize times, odd harmonics, and mucho
noise.
>
>Surprisingly, blissful ignorance shouldn't be thought of as brilliance. You
>constantly assert that I have something to prove to you and you avoid, time
>and again, ever offering up any proof that you have the foggiest idea what
>it is you are talking about. I suggest that you might lead a more
>fullfilling life if you were the least bit helpful.
>
>And that's Mr. Warman to you, cretin.
>