What are you getting for mileage on your 2004 V6 ? - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2005, 05:01   #1 (permalink)
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What are you getting for mileage on your 2004 V6 ?

I had a 2000 V8 with AWD and could get 18+ without trying too hard. About
a 50-50 mix of around town/highway driving.

Now, the 04 with the standard V6 (no AWD) is getting 15 or so. Same
driving habits. Same people driving the car. No new loads.

This just sounds way off to me. I would expect no worse than the 18 I was
getting on a larger engine. I have about 16K miles now and mileage has
been very consistent since day one.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-29-2005, 16:01   #2 (permalink)
C. E. White
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: What are you getting for mileage on your 2004 V6 ?

The 2004 is larger and heavier than the 2000. Do they both have the same
rear gears? Are you sure your driving styles have not changed becasue of
different preceived dynamics (maybe the 04 is quieter and smoother, so you
unconciously accelerate harder)? How do you check your gas mileage. One tank
averages are notouriously inaccurate. The on board computers are not
particualrly accurate either (my Expedition's onboard computer over
estimates the mileage by at least 1 mpg, My Mother's Grand Marquis computer
always underestimates the mileage).

The EPA estimated a 2000 V8 AWD Explorer at 14 city / 20 Highway. A 2004 V-6
4WD Exploer is rated at 15 city / 20 Highway. It seems to me that, the 2004
V-6 should get the same mileage as the 2000 V-8 all other factor being
equal. However, all factors are not always equal. Since the 2004 is heavier
than the 2000, if you tend to accelerate briskly, you could expect the 2004
to get worse mielage. Likewise, since the 2004 is larger, it is likely to
get slightly lower mileage at higher speeds.

2004 V-6 4x4 - 210 Hp, 3.55:1 Rear Axle (std, 3.73 optional); 4480 lb curb
weight; .41 drag coefficient; 36 sq ft frontal area
2000 V-8 AWD - 215 Hp, 3.55:1 Rear Axle (std, 3.73 optional); 4113 lb curb
weight, .xx drag coefficient, 33 sq ft frontal area

Ed


"Mark" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:bg05c1d2bchf0iqtma4k5r28ig5n398mr3@4ax.com...
> I had a 2000 V8 with AWD and could get 18+ without trying too hard. About
> a 50-50 mix of around town/highway driving.
>
> Now, the 04 with the standard V6 (no AWD) is getting 15 or so. Same
> driving habits. Same people driving the car. No new loads.
>
> This just sounds way off to me. I would expect no worse than the 18 I was
> getting on a larger engine. I have about 16K miles now and mileage has
> been very consistent since day one.



  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.explorer



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.