michael johnson pe is full of crap - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 04:01 PM
fordman3@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
michael johnson pe is full of crap

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
<cds@erols.com> wrote:

>Injectors don't go bad very often. When they are off the car they can
>be cleaned easily and then used as replacements when, and if, the ones
>on the car stop working. Most all times the reason the stock injectors
>are sold is because the owner did mods that require greater fuel
>delivery, not because they are clogged.
>
>IsellJeeps wrote:
>> buying used injectors is a little weiry..... I dont mind used parts but used
>> injectors could be clogged as well
>>
>>
>>


lmfao
some can be" cleaned'
ultrasonically but more often their toast

h
u
r
c
a
s
t



 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 04:01 PM
Michael Johnson, PE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

foad

fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Injectors don't go bad very often. When they are off the car they can
>>be cleaned easily and then used as replacements when, and if, the ones
>>on the car stop working. Most all times the reason the stock injectors
>>are sold is because the owner did mods that require greater fuel
>>delivery, not because they are clogged.
>>
>>IsellJeeps wrote:
>>
>>>buying used injectors is a little weiry..... I dont mind used parts but used
>>>injectors could be clogged as well
>>>
>>>
>>>

>
>
> lmfao
> some can be" cleaned'
> ultrasonically but more often their toast
>
> h
> u
> r
> c
> a
> s
> t
>

 
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 09:01 PM
cprice@here.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

Michael Johnson, PE wrote:

> foad
>
> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>
>>


Whose the top posting wanker now?
 
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 10:01 PM
Michael Johnson, PE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

cprice@here.com wrote:
> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
>> foad
>>
>> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>

>
> Whose the top posting wanker now?


Dude, I wasn't the one that slammed you for top posting. I do it myself
on occasion. You top posted about one of several remarks I made so top
posting wasn't the best choice in that situation, IMHO, of course. I
couldn't case less, even if you posted upside down and backwards.
 
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 10:01 PM
fordman3@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:15:06 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
<cds@erols.com> wrote:

>cprice@here.com wrote:
>> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>>
>>> foad
>>>
>>> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>

>>
>> Whose the top posting wanker now?

>
>Dude, I wasn't the one that slammed you for top posting. I do it myself
>on occasion. You top posted about one of several remarks I made so top
>posting wasn't the best choice in that situation, IMHO, of course. I
>couldn't case less, even if you posted upside down and backwards.


who gives a fock
h
u
r
c
a
s
t

 
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-10-05, 11:01 PM
Michael Johnson, PE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:15:06 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>
>
>>cprice@here.com wrote:
>>
>>>Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>foad
>>>>
>>>>fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>>>><cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Whose the top posting wanker now?

>>
>>Dude, I wasn't the one that slammed you for top posting. I do it myself
>>on occasion. You top posted about one of several remarks I made so top
>>posting wasn't the best choice in that situation, IMHO, of course. I
>>couldn't case less, even if you posted upside down and backwards.

>
>
> who gives a fock


foad
 
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-11-05, 03:01 PM
cprice@here.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap


Look who the bottom posting wanker is now...


Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:15:06 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> cprice@here.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> foad
>>>>>
>>>>> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>>>>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whose the top posting wanker now?
>>>
>>>
>>> Dude, I wasn't the one that slammed you for top posting. I do it
>>> myself on occasion. You top posted about one of several remarks I
>>> made so top posting wasn't the best choice in that situation, IMHO,
>>> of course. I couldn't case less, even if you posted upside down and
>>> backwards.

>>
>>
>>
>> who gives a fock

>
>
> foad

 
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old 09-11-05, 03:01 PM
Michael Johnson, PE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: michael johnson pe is full of crap

cprice@here.com wrote:
>
> Look who the bottom posting wanker is now...


foad, frog

> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>
>> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:15:06 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> cprice@here.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> foad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fordman3@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:56:52 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
>>>>>>> <cds@erols.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Whose the top posting wanker now?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dude, I wasn't the one that slammed you for top posting. I do it
>>>> myself on occasion. You top posted about one of several remarks I
>>>> made so top posting wasn't the best choice in that situation, IMHO,
>>>> of course. I couldn't case less, even if you posted upside down and
>>>> backwards.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> who gives a fock

>>
>>
>>
>> foad

 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome