Now THIS could be worth buying - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars

01-05-2006, 05:01

Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
Charger

http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Auto...nger/index.htm

01-05-2006, 09:01

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108697

01-05-2006, 16:01

Next thing you know, Ford will be marketing the 1932 coupe.
(I wish)

<michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1136478912.686814.172120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108697
>

01-05-2006, 17:01

In article <1136464661.398525.282480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca wrote:
> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
> Charger
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Auto...nger/index.htm

Amazing how much better their cars look when they drop that fugly truck
front end.

01-05-2006, 19:01

<michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:1136464661.398525.282480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
> Charger
>
>
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Auto...nger/index.htm
>

If the bean counters don't muck it up, I'd _love_ to have one. Saw a pic
on the cover of one of the current auto rags, NICE lookin' car.

But...
The new Charger looked pretty good on the show circuit, too. I hope the
Challenger doesn't morph into something hideous.
--
John C.
'03 Cobra Convt.

01-05-2006, 20:01

Bill wrote:
> Next thing you know, Ford will be marketing the 1932 coupe.
> (I wish)
>
> <michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:1136478912.686814.172120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=108697
>>
>
>
>

You would be able to buy/build a very high quality 32 roadster for what
ford would want for a retro-look 32 coupe.

01-06-2006, 16:01

Exactly.

01-07-2006, 11:01

On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:00:11 GMT, "John C." <jonc@shore.net> wrote:

>
><michaelanderson4@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:1136464661.398525.282480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>> Unlike the previous incarnations we've seen, or the current Dodge
>> Charger
>>
>>
>http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/04/Auto...nger/index.htm
>>
>
> If the bean counters don't muck it up, I'd _love_ to have one. Saw a pic
>on the cover of one of the current auto rags, NICE lookin' car.
>
> But...
> The new Charger looked pretty good on the show circuit, too. I hope the
>Challenger doesn't morph into something hideous.
>
Well given http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/06/Auto...ines/index.htm
there might not be much under the hood on any future products.
--

"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites.
Moderation is for monks."

ZombyWoof
(take the dogs when replying via e-mail)