Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

ยป Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2005, 00:10   #1 (permalink)
CobraJet
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

In article <1109699819.318556.194090@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
<one80out@hotmail.com> wrote:

> You thought wrong! No more facts. We're sick of facts. Cut it out.
> We're on to you and your whole agenda. Stop reading, stop typing, and
> stop trying to tell us things we don't already know.
>
> 180 Out
>


Abso-friggin-lutely right, and let's not mention that Hot Rod ran
the P head against the 305 Vortec on 351 and 350-inch motors,
respectively, and the P choked big time. It's optimized for 302 inches
and that's all she wrote. The Vortec, predictably, worked twitchinly on
the 350.

But we not only knew this already, none of even care.

--
CobraJet
Thunder Snake #1
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-17-2005, 00:10   #2 (permalink)
CobraJet
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

In article <422549F4.5020601@your.disposal>, Wound Up
<none@your.disposal> wrote:

>
> The wind has buffeted you such that your stream of pee has hit you in
> the face. I see you have now attempted to pull a 180, but have sadly
> failed.


Uh, I think you missed the point, bitter though it was.

--
CobraJet
Thunder Snake #1
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2005, 00:11   #3 (permalink)
NoOption5L@aol.com
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

CobraJet wrote:
> In article <422549F4.5020601@your.disposal>, Wound Up
> <none@your.disposal> wrote:


> > The wind has buffeted you such that your stream of pee has hit you

in
> > the face. I see you have now attempted to pull a 180, but have

sadly
> > failed.


> Uh, I think you missed the point, bitter though it was.


CJ,

I'm truly amazed he missed the intentional and very obvious role
reversal.

Patrick
'93 Cobra

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2005, 00:12   #4 (permalink)
Wound Up
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

NoOption5L@aol.com wrote:
> CobraJet wrote:
>
>>In article <422549F4.5020601@your.disposal>, Wound Up
>><none@your.disposal> wrote:

>
>
>>>The wind has buffeted you such that your stream of pee has hit you

>>

> in
>
>>>the face. I see you have now attempted to pull a 180, but have

>>

> sadly
>
>>>failed.

>>

>
>> Uh, I think you missed the point, bitter though it was.

>
>
> CJ,
>
> I'm truly amazed he missed the intentional and very obvious role
> reversal.


Whoops. I just thought it was a bad impression. Ya threw one by me,
Patrick, but next time, it's going out of the park. =)

>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra


 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2005, 00:12   #5 (permalink)
NoOption5L@aol.com
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

Wound Up wrote:

> > I'm truly amazed he missed the intentional and very obvious
> > role reversal.


> Whoops. I just thought it was a bad impression. Ya threw one
> by me, Patrick, but next time, it's going out of the park. =)


Hey, no problem. It was only strike one. We'll give you two more
before we count you out. ;-)

Patrick
'93 Cobra

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2005, 00:13   #6 (permalink)
Wound Up
 
Posts: n/a
Re: GT40s vs GT40Ps - The Numbers

NoOption5L@aol.com wrote:
> Wound Up wrote:
>
>
>>>I'm truly amazed he missed the intentional and very obvious
>>>role reversal.

>>

>
>>Whoops. I just thought it was a bad impression. Ya threw one
>>by me, Patrick, but next time, it's going out of the park. =)

>
>
> Hey, no problem. It was only strike one. We'll give you two more
> before we count you out. ;-)


Fair enough. I'll dial that pitch in. ;-) All in good fun.

>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra
>



--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ba Gt/gt-p Vin Numbers GT-P 738 FPV & Tickford Forum 2 12-17-2004 06:51
Dubya quietly works on the draft/conscription dave_au The Pub 59 06-12-2004 02:20
TAC - A look at the numbers..... Casper The Pub 2 07-25-2003 23:02
engine numbers migraine The Pub 1 07-01-2001 12:51
matching numbers on classic mustangs msprague The Pub 1 07-01-2001 00:52

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:12.

Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0