Ford Forum Ford Forum
Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Register Home Forum Active Topics Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

ยป Wheel & Tire Center

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Sponsors

Sponsors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2006, 16:01   #11 (permalink)
Ritz
 
Posts: n/a
Re: will it fit?

RSCamaro wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:30:03 -0500, Ritz <ritz@mordor.net> wrote:
>
>
>> You can get gobs of torque from a turbo or supercharged small engine
>> too. As a matter of fact, I am modifying the 2.7L engine
>> (lesseee....about 170 cubic inches) in my A6 with larger turbos and
>> associated software changes and that will bump it into the neighborhood
>> of 460hp and 455ft/lbs of torque on pump gas. With a flip of the
>> software switch, I'll be able to tank it up on 103 octane race gas and
>> do 525hp and 550ft/lbs. And this is in a daily driver porky German
>> highway cruiser. You really can turn a 6 or smaller 8 into a stump
>> puller without putting a boat anchor in the engine bay.

>
> What's the cost per hp ratio? Since I'm in an area where I can find
> and buy the V-10 and wiring harness out of a junk yard truck fairly
> cheaply, I'm pretty sure that I could do the job for less. I wouldn't
> have to buy the supercharger or turbo kit, or possibly a replacement
> hood which would need to be painted, a laptop computer or the programs
> necessary to change the engine parameters to work with the new parts.
> According to one web site the 6.8L V-10 is only 140 lbs more than the
> engine that currently is under the hood of my Mustang. I could live
> with that.


The parts are going to cost me about $10k. Stock output for that engine
is 250hp. I like this particular application because it's still a very
cushy daily driver, handles like it's on rails, has AWD (important for
us northeasterners), still will get 20+mpg and won't require any
fabrication, pulling engines, or changing the outward appearance at all.
It will continue to be a baby/groceries hauler in addition to being
able to do low-12's in the 1/4. 8-)

Sure, I could probably achieve similar results if I spent a few grand on
a ratty fox Mustang and then 6-8K on mods. But then I'd still be
driving around a ratty fox Mustang. 8-) I've gotten used to a comfy,
quiet, AWD car. Maybe later this summer I'll reconsider getting a
supercharged GT or a Z06 'vette for warm/dry weather fun.

Cheers,
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks and Cars > Fordforums Community > USENET NewsGroups > rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22.

Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0