Ford Forums is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. We discuss all Ford models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
In article <43C81E3A.771094F9@erols.com>, Stan Weiss
<srweiss@erols.com> wrote:
> CobraJet wrote:
> >
> > What's a watermark? I can't find one in my Ford Service Manual.
>
> It is still in engineering, So you may not see it there for some time.
> <g>
Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
CobraJet wrote:
> In article <43C81E3A.771094F9@erols.com>, Stan Weiss
> <srweiss@erols.com> wrote:
>
>
>>CobraJet wrote:
>>
>>> What's a watermark? I can't find one in my Ford Service Manual.
>>
>>It is still in engineering, So you may not see it there for some time.
>><g>
>
>
> Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
> asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
> disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
>
Received. I would love to participate in this discussion.
I don't understand the concept of quench. I don't know what any numeric
values around it might be, like average, good or bad, related to
specific applications. I don't understand the dynamics of this
mysterious thing is with cam duration, lift, head design and CC design,
CR, etc. I'm sure this admission points to other things I don't know
about it. If you guys wanna discuss it, I'm all ears...
CobraJet wrote:
>
> In article <43C81E3A.771094F9@erols.com>, Stan Weiss
> <srweiss@erols.com> wrote:
>
> > CobraJet wrote:
> > >
> > > What's a watermark? I can't find one in my Ford Service Manual.
> >
> > It is still in engineering, So you may not see it there for some time.
> > <g>
>
> Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
> asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
> disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
> >
> > Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
> > asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
> > disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
>
> Maybe this will help it gets into quench/squish and swirl.
> http://moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/5115/
>
> >
> > CobraJet
Thanks Stan. These are fairly "thick" articles, so I will read them
several times each. But they both shed light on concepts that were
'nebulous' to me.
I have so much to learn about so many things
> Stan Weiss wrote:
>
>>CobraJet wrote:
>
>
>>> Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
>>>asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
>>>disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
>>
>>Maybe this will help it gets into quench/squish and swirl.
>>http://moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/5115/
>>
>>
>>> CobraJet
>>
Re: Now is Quech, Squish and Swirl Was Re: Background watermark
The 2 stroke people have been into this for along time. They get into
squish ratio, squish area, squish volume, max. squish velocity in m/s
and degrees BTDC for Max. Velocity.
Stan
Wound Up wrote:
>
> Stan Weiss wrote:
> > Here is another article
> > http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...0212hpp_spark/
> >
>
> Thanks Stan. These are fairly "thick" articles, so I will read them
> several times each. But they both shed light on concepts that were
> 'nebulous' to me.
>
> I have so much to learn about so many things
>
> > Stan Weiss wrote:
> >
> >>CobraJet wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
> >>>asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
> >>>disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
> >>
> >>Maybe this will help it gets into quench/squish and swirl.
> >>http://moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/5115/
> >>
> >>
> >>> CobraJet
> >>
>
> --
> Wound Up
> ThunderSnake #65
>
> AHPBBFM pages: http://tinyurl.com/9yulk
Re: Now is Quech, Squish and Swirl Was Re: Background watermark
Stan Weiss wrote:
> The 2 stroke people have been into this for along time. They get into
> squish ratio, squish area, squish volume, max. squish velocity in m/s
> and degrees BTDC for Max. Velocity.
> Stan
>
Yeah, that makes sense, with the design of a 2T engine. The flat head
and the air-pump crank both must be the subject of a lot of discussion.
People have told me to do this and that to the head of my little
commuter bike, but it runs very well, so I'm leaving it alone...
> Wound Up wrote:
>
>>Stan Weiss wrote:
>>
>>>Here is another article
>>>http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...0212hpp_spark/
>>>
>>
>>Thanks Stan. These are fairly "thick" articles, so I will read them
>>several times each. But they both shed light on concepts that were
>>'nebulous' to me.
>>
>>I have so much to learn about so many things
>>
>>
>>>Stan Weiss wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>CobraJet wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Kool. In the meantime, maybe a certain someone gets the hint that
>>>>>asking me about website ssstuff is a waste of time. You feel up for a
>>>>>disssertation on quench, Weisssenator?
>>>>
>>>>Maybe this will help it gets into quench/squish and swirl.
>>>>http://moparmusclemagazine.com/techarticles/5115/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> CobraJet
>>>>
>>--
>>Wound Up
>>ThunderSnake #65
>>
>>AHPBBFM pages: http://tinyurl.com/9yulk
>
Linear Mode
