Ford Forums banner

Good News! Grim Reaper At Work!

9K views 105 replies 0 participants last post by  Wound Up 
G
#1 ·
Those who remember all the trouble I had with the old farts behind
me a couple years back should appreciate this.

A quick recap: 80-something couple were real nice neighbors until
they decided to sell their place. The real estate agent convinced them
that nobody would buy their house for their absurd asking price because
they could see the cars I had in *my* back yard. So, the assholes
complained to the city and I had to move them elsewhere. They failed to
sell their house in the ensuing three years. Last year they rented it
out to a guy named Andy while they stayed up north in their regular
residence, and put it up for sale once again a couple months ago.

Today, Andy told me that the old woman called him to inform him the
house had been sold, and that he would have to move by escrow closing,
scheduled April 26th. But it gets better. Turns out the old man is
literally on his deathbed, losing the battle with the big C combined
with heart problems. He is expected to die at any time. In addition,
his obese wife is having health problems and *her* condition is rapidly
failing.

So, my buddy Grim is going to provide me with the last laugh. After
such long lives, they are going to croak being hated by myself and the
other neighbors around here, and god only knows who else up where they
are now. What a way to go. The moral here: live and let live.

The other good part is the woman and her son that are moving in. I
had a chance the other day to talk with them for about a half hour.
They are from San Jose, Cal, and dig classic cars and motorcycles. She
is eager to tie in the theme I'm doing on the side fence into our
common boundary, staggering some queen palms for that tropical effect.
I advised her to make a lower offer on the house, and she got it 15
thou cheaper. Kool beanz.

With the rear house (this is a 3-in-a-row flag lot) bought 4 months
ago by a hip 60-something woman from San Francisco, this newest deal
eliminates the last people that can complain about anything around
here. I'm jazzed.

CobraJet

--
ThunderSnake #1
 
See less See more
G
#52 ·
ombyWoof wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:12:26 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
> something wonderfully witty:
>
>
>>ZombyWoof wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:26:57 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>>>something wonderfully witty:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mark C. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>All I have to say is... KOOO KOOO!
>>>>
>>>>One must use proper diction and grammar whilst replying to Mr. Woof.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not really, just a modicum of intelligence. Use whatever diction &
>>>grammar you choice. It the message is understandable and the ideas
>>>conveyed, form & format matter not to me. Now when it comes to facts
>>>and figures, yeah 2+2 must always equal 4 or you will be called for
>>>talking out your ass.

>>
>>My message was clear. You are automatically presumed to be dishonest by
>>selecting not to have your posts archived. This is classic troll
>>behavior. But, apparently it's just an issue of pride and ego. You
>>must righteously deny evil Google from reaping unauthorized benefits by
>>having your gem-like posts in their clutches. Gotcha.
>>

>
> By who? You? You lack even the most basic of creditability to sit in
> judge of animal court let alone any other human.



No, by many others, including me. Do you think I made it up? I was
obliquely informing Your Haughtiness that his motives appeared suspect.
And this assessment of my apparent lack of credibility makes no
logical sense.


--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
 
G
#53 ·
ZombyWoof wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:03:34 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
> something wonderfully witty:
>
>
>>ZombyWoof wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:13:45 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>>>something wonderfully witty:
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>No reference manual, just an Internet connection. Very easy nowadays
>>>>>to be a master bullshitter when one has access to the Internet.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This coming from the gentleman lacking whatever dubious credibility one
>>>>can have in Usenet, because of his conscious choice not to have have his
>>>>posts archived. Feigning ignorance to excuse yourself won't work.
>>>>
>>>
>>>So my decision not to support Googles unauthorized use of my writings
>>>as a revenue stream puts what I say into doubt. Talk about bullshit.

>>
>>The impression it leaves is always one of dishonesty. I understand the
>>principle behind it, but I wouldn't worry too much about Google
>>surreptitiously making money off of your posts.

>
> Apparently only to you. In all my years on the net I have never seen
> any one question the honesty of someone not desiring to have their
> posts archived. It is a strange bird indeed who most constantly rely
> on archived posts to make an out of context point. I suspect you walk
> around with a tape recorder recording every conversation you've ever
> had for prosperity.


Then you aren't very observant. I only mentioned it because you,
bearing this mark of troll and bullshitter, was calling someone else the
same, with no basis in fact to make your statements. Chime in at your
own risk.

> Most often those to call the honesty of a person in to question are
> those of dubious honesty in the first place. They think since that is
> why they would do it, others would as well.


Or, it may come from someone who has been burned by giving too many
vampires credit for being human. "The more virtuous any man is, the
less easily does he suspect others to be vicious." - Cicero.
Well, Cicero was right. You might say I've had to become less virtuous
in self-defense of the vicious.

> Among your other faults is a most dubious lack of logic.


Your opinion is noted. Two of your very obvious faults are haughtiness
and arrogance. No one here is going to constantly kiss your ass, so get
used to it.

And what's with including your email address? Were you hoping I
wouldn't notice when I replied? I'm not taking this discussion offline.

--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
 
G
#54 ·
CobraJet wrote:

> > > > > You cannot take down the immortal CobraJet, Wacko Willy.
> > > > > Illustrious, magnificent, omnipotent; I am all of this and

more.
> > > > > I am the sharpest mechanic, the fastest racer, the cleverest

writer.

> > > > You forgot you're also the biggest bullshiter. But I guess

that
> > > > goes without saying after:


> > > > 1) Not being able to produce any time slips.
> > > > 2) Can't even recall his old dragstrip numbers.
> > > > 3) Owns a digital camera, but can't produce a pic of his

*claimed*
> > > > "nearly a ton" of old auto mags.
> > > > 4) Let alone quote any info from any of those mags.
> > > > 5) And doesn't post pics of any of his *claimed* 20-plus

classics.

> > > > Yep, quite the bullshiter... a bullshiter with a monster

reference
> > > > manual that he derives all his auto 60's "knowledge" from.


> > > > Is that what you want to be known for/as?


> > <snippage>


> > > Providing, of course, that I had actually lied about anything.


> > The answers become clearer to everyone with every side-stepping

post
> > you make. Fix your image problem now, Rick. Post some links.


> I don't have an image problem. I'm not an ego case like you.


Oh, no... you sure don't. It isn't as obvious as hell to everyone that
you side-stepped yet again. Rick, post the links.

> > > > > Thing is, you're the only one in the mob.


> > > > I wouldn't say that.


> > > Aligning yourself with Wacko is expected, Patricia. It shows

us
> > > where your head is at.


> > Sorry, Rick. I can't side with someone like you who doesn't tell

the
> > truth.


> Oh my goodness gracious I've been called a liar in Usenet, where
> everyone tells the truth,


So? That doesn't mean you don't.

> > > > > So, be proud of yourself, silly human. Scratch that itch
> > > > > that's been under your skin for four years. Remember me every

time
> > > > > you see a rotting car or an old person slipping from life.

Remember
> > > > > that for there to be *good*, there has to be evil.


> > > > And you remember us as the guys who tried to get you to tell

the
> > truth.


> > > This is Usenet; there are no prerequisites for posting. I

mean,
> > > they let *you* in here.


> > This is true; there are some good honest people in here. There are
> > also some bullshitters. Which one are you, Rick? Post some links.


> I have. Links to dyno threads are among my most recent. Don't you
> pay attention?


Oh, goody. That'll clear up everything about all your previous claims.


Rick, buddy, stay with me here... a link to a picture of your claimed
"nearly a ton" of old car magazines. And a link to some pics of your
cars.

Watch folks. He'll sidestep this request again, I know it. Probably
with something like 'I don't have to do anything you say.' Which will
mean, Rick's a liar, but he's not going to give anyone proof.

> > > > And you could still do it. If you came clean about everything,

and
> > > > the truth was you owned a bunch of ratty old cars, I would

respect you
> > > > completely because you're honest! But I can't respect a
> > > > bullshitter/liar.


> > > I already admitted to *all* of Wacko's "charges" <snicker>.


> > Don't laugh. This isn't a game.


> The hell you say. I've never seen more games than in Usenet.


Maybe you wouldn't see so many games if you weren't always starting or
getting into them.

> > People like to know who they're
> > dealing with. And it's now apparent that you lead people on. You

try
> > to make people think you're something you're not... that you own

things
> > that you don't. You have become what you have always *said* you
> > dispised, only worse.


> It's like this, Patty. I expect people to either pay attention to
> what I say about on-topic stuff, or *not* pay attention. It's up to
> them. I don't tell them what to do or say or think. Unlike you, mein
> herr.


Rick, you tell people who they shouldn't talk to in the BB NG.

> > You're a mutated Troy the Troll/White Tornado. I say worse because

at
> > least they owned the things they said they owned, and did the

things
> > they said they did. I could at least respect them for that. You

on
> > the other hand, seem to just make it up as you go.


> Well, guess what, Patty? I came into RAMFM years ago as CobraJet
> with all the intentions of playing it straight. After all, I was a
> newbie with tons of info I could pass along (it's all there in the
> Google). What happened? For starters, dipshit Anthony thought I was
> somebody else from before, and began trying to prove it. Then I got
> caught in a huge game in the middle of several of the regulars, who
> obviously got convinced I really was someone else from before.
> Bewildered and confused, I reached out twice in email to dwight, as

he
> seemed to be a reasonable person. Silence from him. Asshole.


> And so I dug down, weathered the storm, and created the new and
> improved CobraJet. You and the other game-playing assholes created

me,
> Patty. So enjoy the creation and shut up.


"Created you"... give me a F'ing break! Am I talking to a 50 year old,
or a 5 year old? You are what you are, only you've tried to become
something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is trying to
blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?

> The Mighty CobraJet
> ThunderSnake #1


Now there's a guy playing it straight.

> P.S. As I think about it, every car I own has been posted in my
> webspace except the van and the '86 Cougar. I guess if you had been
> paying more attention, you wouldn't have missed them. Shame.


Well damn me for not scanning every post in Usenet. And damn you for
not posting the link in this or the numerous other threads I've asked
you to.

So the link is?

Patrick
'93 Cobra
 
G
#55 ·
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:31:23 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
something wonderfully witty:

>ombyWoof wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:12:26 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>> something wonderfully witty:
>>
>>
>>>ZombyWoof wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:26:57 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>>>>something wonderfully witty:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Mark C. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>All I have to say is... KOOO KOOO!
>>>>>
>>>>>One must use proper diction and grammar whilst replying to Mr. Woof.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not really, just a modicum of intelligence. Use whatever diction &
>>>>grammar you choice. It the message is understandable and the ideas
>>>>conveyed, form & format matter not to me. Now when it comes to facts
>>>>and figures, yeah 2+2 must always equal 4 or you will be called for
>>>>talking out your ass.
>>>
>>>My message was clear. You are automatically presumed to be dishonest by
>>>selecting not to have your posts archived. This is classic troll
>>>behavior. But, apparently it's just an issue of pride and ego. You
>>>must righteously deny evil Google from reaping unauthorized benefits by
>>>having your gem-like posts in their clutches. Gotcha.
>>>

>>
>> By who? You? You lack even the most basic of creditability to sit in
>> judge of animal court let alone any other human.

>
>
>No, by many others, including me. Do you think I made it up? I was
>obliquely informing Your Haughtiness that his motives appeared suspect.
> And this assessment of my apparent lack of credibility makes no
>logical sense.
>

Apparently your the only one flapping your jaws.
--

"Maybe worshiping the cross and the painful death rather
than the well lived life really has distorted our sense
of who we are and what life is about." -- Author unkown
 
G
#56 ·
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:45:51 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
something wonderfully witty:

>ZombyWoof wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:03:34 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>> something wonderfully witty:
>>
>>
>>>ZombyWoof wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:13:45 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
>>>>something wonderfully witty:
>>>><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>No reference manual, just an Internet connection. Very easy nowadays
>>>>>>to be a master bullshitter when one has access to the Internet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>This coming from the gentleman lacking whatever dubious credibility one
>>>>>can have in Usenet, because of his conscious choice not to have have his
>>>>>posts archived. Feigning ignorance to excuse yourself won't work.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So my decision not to support Googles unauthorized use of my writings
>>>>as a revenue stream puts what I say into doubt. Talk about bullshit.
>>>
>>>The impression it leaves is always one of dishonesty. I understand the
>>>principle behind it, but I wouldn't worry too much about Google
>>>surreptitiously making money off of your posts.

>>
>> Apparently only to you. In all my years on the net I have never seen
>> any one question the honesty of someone not desiring to have their
>> posts archived. It is a strange bird indeed who most constantly rely
>> on archived posts to make an out of context point. I suspect you walk
>> around with a tape recorder recording every conversation you've ever
>> had for prosperity.

>
>Then you aren't very observant. I only mentioned it because you,
>bearing this mark of troll and bullshitter, was calling someone else the
>same, with no basis in fact to make your statements. Chime in at your
>own risk.
>
>> Most often those to call the honesty of a person in to question are
>> those of dubious honesty in the first place. They think since that is
>> why they would do it, others would as well.

>
>Or, it may come from someone who has been burned by giving too many
>vampires credit for being human. "The more virtuous any man is, the
>less easily does he suspect others to be vicious." - Cicero.
>Well, Cicero was right. You might say I've had to become less virtuous
>in self-defense of the vicious.
>
>> Among your other faults is a most dubious lack of logic.

>
>Your opinion is noted. Two of your very obvious faults are haughtiness
>and arrogance. No one here is going to constantly kiss your ass, so get
>used to it.
>
>And what's with including your email address? Were you hoping I
>wouldn't notice when I replied? I'm not taking this discussion offline.
>

What e-mail address dick for brains? I really don't even care for
talking to you in the group let alone off-line.
--

"Maybe worshiping the cross and the painful death rather
than the well lived life really has distorted our sense
of who we are and what life is about." -- Author unkown
 
G
#57 ·
> What e-mail address dick for brains? I really don't even care for
> talking to you in the group let alone off-line.


So why did you include it? I'm talking about the one you that happened
to be included in your last post as a reply-to. Are you, Mr. CIO, just
admittedly incompetent, or are you lying?

Happy Easter, malevolent prick.

--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
 
G
#59 ·
"CobraJet" <slither@fang.ford> wrote in message
news:260320051608055058%slither@fang.ford...
>
> Bewildered and confused, I reached out twice in email to dwight, as he
> seemed to be a reasonable person. Silence from him. Asshole.


If I had ever received an email from you, I'd still have a copy of it burned
onto CD. A true collector's item.

Since I have no memory of receiving any personal communiques from you, I'll
simply believe that you addressed them WRONG, failed to remove a letter or
group of letters meant to block spam, had them bounce back in your face, and
called me an asshole for not replying.

Asshole.

dwight
 
G
#60 ·
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:51:08 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
something wonderfully witty:

>> What e-mail address dick for brains? I really don't even care for
>> talking to you in the group let alone off-line.

>
>So why did you include it? I'm talking about the one you that happened
>to be included in your last post as a reply-to. Are you, Mr. CIO, just
>admittedly incompetent, or are you lying?
>
>Happy Easter, malevolent prick.
>

Dude I don't change my news reader configuration from post to post so
either share the drugs or take a fistful and go away. Oh and now you
have a problem with my fuckin job? What kind of idiot are you
anyways? Geez you really are on drugs.
--

"Maybe worshiping the cross and the painful death rather
than the well lived life really has distorted our sense
of who we are and what life is about." -- Author unkown
 
G
#62 ·
"WindsorFox[SS]" <windsorfoxNO@SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
news:MkA1e.67502$7z6.22095@lakeread04...
> dwight wrote:
>> Asshole.
>>
>> dwight

>
> Needledick!!!


Hey. You been talking to my wife?

dwight
 
G
#63 ·
In article <1111900357.136123.253970@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
<NoOption5L@aol.com> wrote:

> You are what you are, only you've tried to become
> something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is trying to
> blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?


Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
loop?

"Your mission, Patty, should you decide to accept it, is to flush
out the identity and game plan of the evil CobraJet. As usual, should
you or any member of your IM force be cornholed so bad you can't walk,
the secretary will disavow any knowledge of your existence. Agents Frog
and Wacko are already under cover to assist you. Good luck, Patty. This
fortune cookie will self-destruct in ten seconds. Ppphhhttt!"

<seven years later>

CobraJet is having a drink at the Snake Pit, when three haggard,
used-up seret agents arrive and confront him with guns drawn.

"We're onto your game, oh Fanged Beast, and it only took us seven
years to figure it out. Confess to the other boys and girls in
Usenet-land what your secret identity is or we'll blast you where you
stand, er, sit coiled up."

"Uh, guys, those are water pistols. What are you going to do, drown
me?"

"Never mind that. We're the lynch mob that going to drag your name
in the dirt for all to see. After all, we don't tolerate you calling my
stellar achievements with a plastic tool kit "bush league". Plus, you
made Agent Frog become a transsexual named Barbara Jean and Wacko was
forced to play Titty Twister with his daughter's best friend in order
to cope. You morally corrupt bastard, you."

"Well guys, you got me cold, and there's just no way I can see to
slither out of this, so do what you gotta do, and I guess I'll just
take the shame and humiliation that I know is going to drive me to
drink cut-rate booze instead of the good stuff. Fire away."

"OK, Omnipotent One, have it your way. First we are going to post a
pic of the scoreboard whirring in Agent Wacko's head, so everyone can
see you're down on points. Then Agent Frog is going to dress up as a
nun from your old school so he can run a guilt trip on you. Then I'm
going to rally the thousands who read my regurgitated news links into
shunning you for life. What do you have to say to that, Thunderous
Serpent?"

"You da man, Patty. You da man."


>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra
>


--
ThunderSnake #1
 
G
#64 ·
In article <rIWdnbEyzazVVdvfRVn-tQ@comcast.com>, dwight
<tfrog93@GEEmail.com> wrote:

> "CobraJet" <slither@fang.ford> wrote in message
> news:260320051608055058%slither@fang.ford...
> >
> > Bewildered and confused, I reached out twice in email to dwight, as he
> > seemed to be a reasonable person. Silence from him. Asshole.

>
> If I had ever received an email from you, I'd still have a copy of it burned
> onto CD. A true collector's item.
>
> Since I have no memory of receiving any personal communiques from you, I'll
> simply believe that you addressed them WRONG, failed to remove a letter or
> group of letters meant to block spam, had them bounce back in your face, and
> called me an asshole for not replying.


No, they didn't bounce. It was obvious in the following melee that
you just wanted to sit back and watch.

>
> Asshole.


Gettin' old, ain'tcha?

>
> dwight
>
>


--
ThunderSnake #1
 
G
#65 ·
ZombyWoof wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:51:08 GMT, Wound Up <none@your.disposal> wrote
> something wonderfully witty:
>
>
>>>What e-mail address dick for brains? I really don't even care for
>>>talking to you in the group let alone off-line.

>>
>>So why did you include it? I'm talking about the one you that happened
>>to be included in your last post as a reply-to. Are you, Mr. CIO, just
>>admittedly incompetent, or are you lying?
>>
>>Happy Easter, malevolent prick.
>>

>
> Dude I don't change my news reader configuration from post to post so
> either share the drugs or take a fistful and go away. Oh and now you
> have a problem with my fuckin job? What kind of idiot are you
> anyways? Geez you really are on drugs.


I don't know what happened then. Your address really did appear in the
reply line, but whatever...

May the giant rabbits bring you many festive eggs. I got this funny
little orange barrel-shaped egg. Kinda nasty tasting, but the rabbits
all gave me hugs of approval. And man, who painted all these melting
colors? They won't come off my hands, and I'm leaving them on whatever
I touch...

--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
 
G
#67 ·
CobraJet wrote:

> > You are what you are, only you've tried to become
> > something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is trying

to
> > blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?


> Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
> loop?


> "Your mission, <snipped diversionary story>


Post links to your cars, magazines, or time slips, Rick.

Patrick
'93 Cobra
 
G
#68 ·
In article <1111960513.599300.226320@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<NoOption5L@aol.com> wrote:

> CobraJet wrote:
>
> > > You are what you are, only you've tried to become
> > > something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is trying

> to
> > > blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?

>
> Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
> loop?
>
> "Your mission, Patty, should you decide to accept it, is to flush
> out the identity and game plan of the evil CobraJet. As usual, should
> you or any member of your IM force be cornholed so bad you can't walk,
> the secretary will disavow any knowledge of your existence. Agents Frog
> and Wacko are already under cover to assist you. Good luck, Patty. This
> fortune cookie will self-destruct in ten seconds. Ppphhhttt!"
>
> <seven years later>
>
> CobraJet is having a drink at the Snake Pit, when three haggard,
> used-up seret agents arrive and confront him with guns drawn.
>
> "We're onto your game, oh Fanged Beast, and it only took us seven
> years to figure it out. Confess to the other boys and girls in
> Usenet-land what your secret identity is or we'll blast you where you
> stand, er, sit coiled up."
>
> "Uh, guys, those are water pistols. What are you going to do, drown
> me?"
>
> "Never mind that. We're the lynch mob that going to drag your name
> in the dirt for all to see. After all, we don't tolerate you calling my
> stellar achievements with a plastic tool kit "bush league". Plus, you
> made Agent Frog become a transsexual named Barbara Jean and Wacko was
> forced to play Titty Twister with his daughter's best friend in order
> to cope. You morally corrupt bastard, you."
>
> "Well guys, you got me cold, and there's just no way I can see to
> slither out of this, so do what you gotta do, and I guess I'll just
> take the shame and humiliation that I know is going to drive me to
> drink cut-rate booze instead of the good stuff. Fire away."
>
> "OK, Omnipotent One, have it your way. First we are going to post a
> pic of the scoreboard whirring in Agent Wacko's head, so everyone can
> see you're down on points. Then Agent Frog is going to dress up as a
> nun from your old school so he can run a guilt trip on you. Then I'm
> going to rally the thousands who read my regurgitated news links into
> shunning you for life. What do you have to say to that, Thunderous
> Serpent?"
>
> "You da man, Patty. You da man."


<lead-for-brains Patricia whined>

> Post links to your cars, magazines, or time slips, Rick.


No, Patrick. Take me to Funkytown. C'mon, crucify me. I'm waiting.
All those "folks" you keep talking to in your head are waiting, too. Do
it now.

>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra
>


--
CobraJet
 
G
#69 ·
CobraJet wrote:

> > CobraJet wrote:


> > > > You are what you are, only you've tried to become
> > > > something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is

trying
> > > > to blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?


> > Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
> > loop?


> > "You da man, Patty. You da man."


> > Post links to your cars, magazines, or time slips, Rick.


> Rick wrote:


> No, Patrick.


Which means:

1) Links to your cars = too embarrassed to.
2) "Nearly a ton of old car magazines" = can't because I lied and don't
own any.
3) Time slips = never had any.

Patrick
'93 Cobra
 
G
#70 ·
oOption5L@aol.com wrote:
> CobraJet wrote:
>
>
>>>CobraJet wrote:

>>

>
>>>>> You are what you are, only you've tried to become
>>>>>something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is
>>>>

> trying
>
>>>>>to blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?
>>>>

>
>>> Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
>>> loop?

>>

>
>>> "You da man, Patty. You da man."

>>

>
>>>Post links to your cars, magazines, or time slips, Rick.

>>

>
>>Rick wrote:

>
>
>>No, Patrick.

>
>
> Which means:
>
> 1) Links to your cars = too embarrassed to.
> 2) "Nearly a ton of old car magazines" = can't because I lied and don't
> own any.
> 3) Time slips = never had any.
>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra



It means you are a very tiresome, broken record. Just give up, Pat,
you're just not proving anything except else at this point. I wouldn't
acquiesce to your repeated instructions, either.

--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
 
G
#71 ·
"CobraJet" <slither@fang.ford> wrote in message
news:270320051149452251%slither@fang.ford...
> In article <rIWdnbEyzazVVdvfRVn-tQ@comcast.com>, dwight
> <tfrog93@GEEmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "CobraJet" <slither@fang.ford> wrote in message
>> news:260320051608055058%slither@fang.ford...
>> >
>> > Bewildered and confused, I reached out twice in email to dwight, as he
>> > seemed to be a reasonable person. Silence from him. Asshole.

>>
>> If I had ever received an email from you, I'd still have a copy of it
>> burned
>> onto CD. A true collector's item.
>>
>> Since I have no memory of receiving any personal communiques from you,
>> I'll
>> simply believe that you addressed them WRONG, failed to remove a letter
>> or
>> group of letters meant to block spam, had them bounce back in your face,
>> and
>> called me an asshole for not replying.

>
> No, they didn't bounce. It was obvious in the following melee that
> you just wanted to sit back and watch.


Instead of making BOTH of these ASSumptions, you could have simply asked.
But, no - you prefer the conspiracy theories.

>> Asshole.

>
> Gettin' old, ain'tcha?


Yep. About as quickly as you.

dwight
 
G
#72 ·
Whole Lotta Tom wrote:

> Are you seriously trying to imply that "A "28" broken in half is a

"2."" is
> a metaphor?


Oh brother, not another Usenet semantics debate.

See, it's like this. Over there in RAMFM someone typed that Limp Rick
had "been there done that." I responded that this was mistaken. Limp
Rick of course took exception to the affront, and it escalated from
there, to where I typed up what I had concluded about Rick Brown from
my reading of his posts beginning in December 2000.

As you know just as well as I do, Rick Brown is in fact an emotionally
immature desert hermit who, in his early 20's, was a hanger-on in the
San Fernando Valley street racing scene of the '70's; that he started
with a poseur 289-2v '68 Mustang GT/CS; that he moved on to an Olds
4-4-2 into which he dropped a purpose-built 455, but still couldn't
break 12.5 in the quarter; that from the time he switched his 4-4-2 to
"race-only" status in the late '70's to the present day, his daily
drivers have been a Courier mini-truck, a 3.8 Fox-body Cougar, a Honda
Accord, and his current 2-ton taxicab; that he's probably never even
driven on a drag strip; and that of the 30 cars he presently owns, no
more than one or two have been in running condition within the past
four years; some have not run for decades.

Brown responds by "stripping" my TS number. (Remember, none of what I
posted about Brown had anything to do with ahpbbfm; it had only to do
with your Fearless Leader's ego.) I mocked this absurd action with the
metaphor of the opening sequence in a 1965 TV western called "Branded,"
in which the star Chuck Connors -- an officer who was wrongly convicted
of desertion under fire during an Indian attack -- is mustered out by
having the C.O. rip his insignia off his tunic, then break his sword in
half and throw it out the stockade gate. On his way out, Chuck picks
up the handle part of the broken sword and takes it with him. That
broken sword then becomes his gimmick weapon, much like Chuck's fancy
rifle in his previous series, "The Rifleman."

Thus, yes, Chuck's use of half of his broken sword is a metaphor for my
use of "TS 2" being half of "TS 28."

So now I've answered your question, Tom, I wonder if you could you
return the favor. Something that I'm really curious about is, what is
the deal with you and Stu and Bill Beyer? I thought you three were good
guys, but the minute this miserable slob Rick Brown turns on me, you're
right there shoulder to shoulder. It's a real wonderment to me. I mean,
what the f**k is it to you guys if Brown has a problem with me, and
vice versa? He needs you a hell of a lot more than you need him. In
fact, without this NG he's nothing; well, he's nothing even with it,
but more so without you guys constantly sucking his worthless dick. So
what's the deal? Why don't you guys just tell him to f**k himself, that
you're not shunning anyone on his command?

180 Out
TS 2
 
G
#73 ·
Wound Up wrote:

> It means you are a very tiresome, broken record.


Yeah, it's much better to change your story to suit the needs of the
moment. For example, on February 14, when you're trying to score
points with your butt-buddy Limp Rick, you write this:

"I have too much spare time and anger toward lawyers because I'm
unemployed, struggling to make ends meet, because my useless, arrogant,
can't-be-wrong lawyer gave me bad advice and incomplete information
through nothing but negligence and laziness. . . . I am an accomplished
professional, now very unfairly stigmatized and nearly bankrupt,
because his lazy ass couldn't do his homework at hundreds/hour. Too
little, too late, sorry pal, oopsie."

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury/msg/601e9303d5c6a11e

But last October it was like this:

> BTW, I think you're great for not
> trying to put the blame on others.
> It's so easy to fall into that trap.


"I know it's all my stupid fault. It is easy to fall into that trap,
but the lightbulb came on after a short while and I said to myself,
"how ridiculous is it to blame ANYONE but yourself for this unholy
mess???" Oh, the courts, the lawyers, the expense... this and that...
wouldn't be there if I hadn't screwed up to begin with."

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.support.loneliness/msg/4d95de29086f365d


Yes, it's much less tiresome not to stick to the truth like some dang
broken record, isn't it Pound Pup?

180 Out
TS 2
 
G
#74 ·
Limp Rick wrote:
..
> NoOp Patrick wrote:

..
> > Limp Rick wrote:


> > > NoOp Patrick wrote:


> > > > And you remember us as the guys who
> > > > tried to get you to tell the truth.

..
> > > This is Usenet; there are no prerequisites for
> > > posting. I mean, they let *you* in here.

..
> > This is true; there are some good honest people
> > in here.  There are also some bullshitters.  
> > Which one are you, Rick?  Post some links.


> I have. Links to dyno threads are among my most
> recent. Don't you pay attention?


In case anyone gets confused that these "dyno threads" have anything to
do with Limp Rick or his dozens of rotting heaps, the reference is to a
link that Limpie posted to a web-based board, where a member had posted
a link to an image of a dyno sheet for HIS engine. Here's the thread:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...6067d7fce6d/32b7637593ff5cb7#32b7637593ff5cb7

See, this is exactly how the Limp One operates. The topic under
"discussion" is the absence of any proof of his constant allusions to
his hands-on involvement in the old car and high performance hobbies.
Limp Rick's response is to throw out the claim that he has recently
posted a link to mutiple "dyno threads." Anyone who doesn't check up
on the claim is left with the understanding that Limp Rick has actually
posted a link to something that proves him to be the can-do, does-do,
hands-on guy. The truth, as always, is that he's the half-drunk
buffoon sitting in his desert blockhouse typing wannabe lies on the
Usenet.

180 Out
TS 2
 
G
#75 ·
In article <1111973286.131728.64810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
<NoOption5L@aol.com> wrote:

> CobraJet wrote:
>
> > > CobraJet wrote:

>
> > > > > You are what you are, only you've tried to become
> > > > > something you're not, and you don't like it when someone is

> trying
> > > > > to blow your cover. And that's the rub, isn't it?

>
> > > Blow my cover!! Wow, whaddya got, Mission Impossible on endless
> > > loop?

>
> > > "You da man, Patty. You da man."

>
> > > Post links to your cars, magazines, or time slips, Rick.

>
> > Rick wrote:

>
> > No, Patrick.

>
> Which means:
>
> 1) Links to your cars = too embarrassed to.
> 2) "Nearly a ton of old car magazines" = can't because I lied and don't
> own any.
> 3) Time slips = never had any.


Hey, PICK WHATEVER IT MEANS TO YOU, SISSY, AND GET ON WITH THE
CRUCIFIXION! What the hell are you waiting for, you impotent son of a
bitch? Now's your chance. Ruin my reputation <smirk> and cast me into a
shamefilled exile in the Usenet wastelands or shut your fucking
impotent yap. You god damned pansy. Get out your plastic hammer and
KILL ME NOW!!!

>
> Patrick
> '93 Cobra
>


--
CobraJet
 
G
#76 ·
In article <1112027070.183072.286200@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<one80out@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Limp Rick wrote:
> .
> > NoOp Patrick wrote:

> .
> > > Limp Rick wrote:

>
> > > > NoOp Patrick wrote:

>
> > > > > And you remember us as the guys who
> > > > > tried to get you to tell the truth.

> .
> > > > This is Usenet; there are no prerequisites for
> > > > posting. I mean, they let *you* in here.

> .
> > > This is true; there are some good honest people
> > > in here.  There are also some bullshitters.  
> > > Which one are you, Rick?  Post some links.

>
> > I have. Links to dyno threads are among my most
> > recent. Don't you pay attention?

>
> In case anyone gets confused that these "dyno threads" have anything to
> do with Limp Rick or his dozens of rotting heaps, the reference is to a
> link that Limpie posted to a web-based board, where a member had posted
> a link to an image of a dyno sheet for HIS engine. Here's the thread:
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury/browse_fr
> m/thread/cc79e6067d7fce6d/32b7637593ff5cb7#32b7637593ff5cb7
>
> See, this is exactly how the Limp One operates. The topic under
> "discussion" is the absence of any proof of his constant allusions to
> his hands-on involvement in the old car and high performance hobbies.
> Limp Rick's response is to throw out the claim that he has recently
> posted a link to mutiple "dyno threads." Anyone who doesn't check up
> on the claim is left with the understanding that Limp Rick has actually
> posted a link to something that proves him to be the can-do, does-do,
> hands-on guy. The truth, as always, is that he's the half-drunk
> buffoon sitting in his desert blockhouse typing wannabe lies on the
> Usenet.


Nobody's confused about anything, jackoff. They're all waiting for
you to actually DO SOMETHING, you self-righteous
scoreboard-hallucinating hypocrite. COME ON, get with your left
testicle PATTY GIRL and DELIVER THE DEATH BLOW. You little Thumpers are
missing your moment in the sun. KILL COBRAJET KILL COBRAJET KILL
COBRAJET!

>
> 180 Out
> TS 2
>


--
CobraJet
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top