Merc

I have a hard time seeing out of the back of my 69 Fastback, I'm sure the
new cars must be better.


Merc
69mach1clone351W
thundersnake#16
<one80out@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1111290100.215656.255810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Amazing how, looking at your car and the 25 years newer one, I'd rather
> have yours. More style, more room, easier to see out of. And there's
> also the lack of depreciation, but that's not the '05's fault.
>
> That dealer's lot looks just like the one in San Leandro. That is, a
> bunch of V6 '05's but no GT's.
>
> 180 Out
>

 

Mr.~G.

Now I now what's missing - CHROME!

MG

"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ts7n31tkp9n96qs75hdkmfbb0if9i6fp7v@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:59:40 -0500, "Grover C. McCoury III"
> <gcmccoury@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>I took some pics at the local Ford dealer - the new 2005 Mustangs with
>>my 1970 Mustang Mach 1 in the mix.
>>
>>Pics are @ http://community.webshots.com/album/298509522SJtaqi
>>
>>Yet another $.02 worth from a proud owner of a 1970 Mach 1 351C @
>>http://community.webshots.com/album/18644819fHAehGJAjt
>
> Maybe it's just bias because I have a 2004 Mach-1, but the newer
> Mustangs seem kind of "naked" compared to yours because of their
> lack of hood scoops.
> -Rich

STUK

"What's behind you does not matter!" StuK

ThunderSnake #11



"Merc" <mach1muscle@hotmail.cam> wrote in message
news:0y9%d.76152$gJ3.71840@clgrps13...
>I have a hard time seeing out of the back of my 69 Fastback, I'm sure the
> new cars must be better.
>
>
> Merc
> 69mach1clone351W
> thundersnake#16
>