|
Re: Why doesn't Ford one-up the Vette?
John wrote:
> "Rich" <none@none.com> wrote in message
> news:ktvql1tfnhoaaiqa9pnd83cpblel1cg963@4ax.com...
>
>>One simple addition to the Mustang line;
>>A small-block 427. They already have the engine,
>>I saw it (if you can image it) in a prototype racing
>>Thunderbird about three years ago.
>>Why won't they do it?
>>How would it look if a Mustang waxed the GT?
>
>
> How about a new aluminum big block 427 side oiler!? Genesis has this block
> in the Ford Racing Performance Parts Catalog now. This would drastically
> increase their production and lower the cost substantially. Supercharge it!
> 6 speed manual transmission! Posi-lock rear end! Then, Ford could one up
> the 2006 GT 500 and the Corvette all in one!
>
> I think Ford should hire me! That's the best idea I heard in a long time!
>
Six valves per cylinder! Seventeen to one compression with variable
valve timing and flex-fuel capability! A variable boost blower! Tank
treads!
No. No no no. Re-visit the multi-fuel turbine, fit it with a
muzzle-braked afterburner, Kevlar worm-traction belly drive (you don't
even know what that is, do you?), hydrostatic powertrain, G-suit,
Mars-lander airbags, speedometer done in terms of Mach, Mad Max
interceptor looks for fun, cowcatcher, wings, thought-controlled HUD,
and when the ignition is off, enable the beer dispenser and the sexual
receptacle.
NOW we're talking fun. GT-500? Corvette? Murcielago? What are those?
--
Wound Up
ThunderSnake #65
|
Linear Mode
