|
Re: 2001 - 2004 Ford Ranger 4.0L QUESTION....
I have a friend that has the 4.0L Ranger (2001 or 2002 I think) and he says
he burns regular also and finds it okay. Good to know you guys aren't
having a problem. Currently I have a 9.5:1 4 cylinder car and it says to
run on regular but it makes a high pitch pinging sound when under heavy
acceleration. When on a higher grade of gas it goes away 'mostly'. I have
to admit though, I don't agree with the statement that 9.7 isn't a high
compression to run on 'Regular 87 Fuel' though. If it is working though, I
won't complain and put in the cheaper stuff if I buy the vehicle.
Thanks All
"Advocate" <Advo@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:CfUCf.731839$x96.291384@attbi_s72...
>
> "T" <bonnyssei@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:v3TCf.246679$tl.189152@pd7tw3no...
>>I was looking at getting a newer used Ford Ranger 4.0L or Mazda B4000
>>extended cab 2 wheel drive truck. I have read that the gas mileage is
>>almost the exact same with the 3.0L and the 4.0L so might as well go with
>>the bigger one - right?
>>
>> Here is the question. I read that the compression on the 4.0L is
>> .7:1 - This is really high yet they say it can run on regular fuel.
>> What do you guys find? Are your engines pinging on regular. What is
>> everyone using for gas in these? Comments......
> 9.7:1 isn't "high" compression. If the users manual says to burn regular
> fuel, that's what you should burn. It's a waste of money to burn higher
> octane than you need.
>
|