Re: 2007 Ranger
I DON'T need an 8' bed, I'm fine with a 6' bed.
The original reply was to look at the SportTrac
which has an even shorter composite bed.
I need a pickup that sips gas, leaps on the highway,
has four doors and 4WD. I'll probably need to special
order a different axle ratio than one on the lot
because they all are rigged to be fast and responsive
and not gas efficient. 90 % of my driving is on the highway.
In VT we've got lots of hills.
Looking at the Toyota to replace the Ranger because they've
got durability, four (real) doors and decent MPG rating.
Looked also at the GMC Canyon, but 5 cylinders scares me.
In article <Xns9765BDA6DAE6jonrpatrickhotmailco@22.214.171.124>,
Jon R Patrick <email@example.com> wrote:
> "Whitelightning" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in
> > The rangers suspension and brakes are already taxed, extending the
> > trucks length
> > another 4 feet for bigger cab and 8 ft box, not a good idea. when you
> > need that big
> > its time for a full size.
> Maybe in the current model, but we have no clue about the future model.