|
Re: Engine oil for 2002 Ford Ranger... 5w20?
"Mark Olson" <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote in message
news:11rovrv6o6i3kbc@corp.supernews.com...
> Pat wrote:
> Why would you use 10W-30 in a pinch, rather than 5W-30?
>
> Also, think carefully about why Ford ecommends 5W-20 only in the USA
> and Canada, but everywhere else in the world, for the exact same
> engines, they recommend 5W-30. Hmmmm.
>
> Free Hint: 'CAFE- Corporate Average Fuel Economy'.
>
> I will continue to use 5W-30 in my 2000 Focus, as the owner's manual
> recommends. That's the oil that engine was designed to use, not
> 5W-20, despite Ford's retroactive CAFE-driven recommendations.
>
> Here's something I found on a Google search:
>
> "When it comes to the new 5W20 grade, however - specified for some
> Honda and Ford models - he's more skeptical. He thinks there is only
> one reason Ford made the switch from 5W30 to 5W20 - to help it meet
> CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards. "Most Ford engines
> haven't changed, why the need then to change the specified grade?" He
> adds that the lighter oil, which doesn't protect as well as the
> heavier stuff, reduces fuel consumption by about 0.2% - not enough to
> be noticed by any single driver."
>
> You can also google for Ford's own bulletins that recommend switching
> to 5W-20, the reason given by Ford is improved fuel economy. I know
> a 0.2 percent improvement in fuel economy is not enough justification
> for _me_ to switch from 5W-30 to 5W-20.
>
Isn't that whole line of thought contradictory? First it says the lower
grade was used to meet CAFE standards (better fuel economy). Then it turns
around and says that the lower grade has almost no impact on fuel economy.
If it has almost no impact, then why would they use it?
Example:
A car gets 20mpg. If changing oil only affects it by 0.2%, the new mileage
would be 20.04mpg. That's not going to help anyone meet CAFE.
-Skramblr
|