Quick Fusion Review - Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars
Ford Forum Ford Forum

» Auto Insurance
» Featured Product
ยป Wheel & Tire Center

Go Back   Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Fusion | Mercury Milan | Lincoln Zephyr | Lincoln MKZ
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Auto Loans Garage Mark Forums Read Auto Escrow

Ford Fusion | Mercury Milan | Lincoln Zephyr | Lincoln MKZ Forum for the discussion of the Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr.

FordForums.com is the premier Ford Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2006, 20:01   #1 (permalink)
Jon R Patrick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quick Fusion Review

I took the time yesterday to go drive a Fusion...I'm not *exactly* in the
market. I drive a Focus as my commuter car for the gas mileage, and I'd
love a slightly larger car, but I love MORE not having a car payment.
I drove the Fusion out of curiousity, and in part I was hoping the car
'wowed' me so much I started jonesing for one.
The Fusion is really nice, but left me about 1 "cool" away from feeling
like I NEED one.

Overall, my first impression is that car-and-driver is wrong. Their next-
to-last issue they compared the Fusion with the camry, accord, and sonata,
and their biggest complain was the fit-and-finish and wide body panel gaps.
Now, based on their review, I expected something that jumped out at you --
like the first generation Saturn body panels where you could stick slices
of bread between the door and fender!
Not true. The Fusion's panels may be wider than their contemporaries, but
Ford did a very good job working out their locations so as to not draw
attention to them.

Summary: The Fusion is a really nice mid-sized family car that drives and
moves leagues better than american-designed cars, if not quite "european"
in feel. On the whole, and as you look at each individual part of the car,
it's just not quite as refined or nice as the accord, but it's a great
value compared with the honda as well. I've owned the accord, and I'd buy
the Ford for the value.

Interior: The low climate controls have been noted in publications before,
and sitting in the dealership or autoshow, I thought it was a bit sillyof a
comment. Once on the road, I 100% agree. They're low and small and hard
to see. That being said, it'll become less of an issue after you buy one
and know where they are and how to glance down at them. that being said,
the heater about blew me out of the car by the time we were driving off the
lot! Very impressive there.
The turn-signal lever is at a funky angle, but once you start moving it
just fades away in to the background and you never have to think about it
to use it -- the hallmark of a good design.
Overall interior is nicely laid out and very attractive. Again, the accord
has the more luxurious interior with a higher-quality dash, but the drop
off now is small. cup holders are handy, 2-stage center console storage is
useful location and size, and almost everything just falls right where you
expect it to be.
I had difficulty finding a comfortable seating position, even with the
power seat with manual seatback angle. Perhaps that was the problem -- too
many choices.
But the back seat, with the front's set at good locations, had generous
legroom for the kids, a critical necessity.
Note to Ford: Add a dead pedal for the driver's left foot.

Driving: okay, I'll be just looking for a daily commuter, so I drove the
mid-level Se with a 4 cyl. and a 5-speed automatic.
My first impression as we go underway? NOISE! This engine is noisy once
you get on the gas, and you get on it a lot to get the car moving good.
Again, comparing it to the Honda and Toyota, the engine was typical ford, a
bit rough and 'old' sounding. But more importantly, it sounded like their
was a pipe from the noisiest part of the engine directly into the passenger
compartment.
In fairness, as the drive wore on I began to notice it less and less, but
when you drive there in a 2000 Focus and immediately notice engine noise,
there's something wrong.
After that, nothing but good impressions. The aforementioned seats gave me
excellent driving position. The tranny shifts about as well as a modern
transmission should (although not as smoothly as a GM tranny) and after a
few minutes, you quickly get a feel for how much gas to give it to get the
gear you want for the gumption you desire.
The steering was a bit numb and heavy, but this is a family car and I found
the steering pleasant.
ride motions were well controlled, with sharp bumps and potholes being
deadened and big humps being controlled with a feeling of heft and
solidity.
I don't know what the numbers are for the cars acceleration, but when you
get on the gas, the Fusion pulls steadily and strongly (but noisy. did I
mention that??) Again, it was the 4cylinder, so I didn't start howling
with glee, but it was a moderately impressive showing.

Second summary! ::
The fusion rides well, has a slightly sporty inclination to it, and does
it's family-car duties without being a boat or worse -- a Taurus.
It feels planted on the road, with very good road isolation and a strong
sense of intergrity.
Bits and pieces of the car can be picked on - the lack of a dead pedal,
climate control positioning, quality of the dash... but those are nitpicks
comparing the Fusion to the greats of the class. The fusion competes with
them, but it doesn't have to beat them on specific items. The car I drove
was about $19,700 and I feel that's a great bargin in this class.
My one hesitation was the engine noise. Again, as I drove I noticed it
less and less, but what about 2 years from now? will I continue to notice
it as I ride with friends and become unhappy with my car? Heck, is the
Mercury quieter??!!

8/10

J
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-15-2006, 21:01   #2 (permalink)
eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Quick Fusion Review

If you want to ride in some cocoon, get the Buick LaCross.

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2006, 21:01   #3 (permalink)
eastwardbound2003@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Quick Fusion Review

You are wrong about the Taurus. It is not a "boat" nor is it some
unpleasant car to drive. I drive one daily and it's got the 24 valve
duratec. It's got some spirited acceleration, it's a smooth sounding
V6. It also also corners very well for a car of this size as it's been
over the hilly pacific northwest before.

I can't say anything about the lower horsepower Vulcan but I do know
that mine has plenty of power for what it is and the V8 SHO option
before must have been a real "sleeper".


East-

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2006, 06:34   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9
Re: Quick Fusion Review

I agree, I just sold my 1999 Mercury Sable LS V6 DOHC. Lots of "get-up". Gas mileage sucked--literally, I only got 19 MPG city, 21 MPG Highway, but overall great car. I sold it 2 months ago with 102,000 miles on it.
I am waiting to order 07 Fusion SEL V6.
iluvford is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Ford Forums - Mustang Forum, Ford Trucks, Ford Focus and Ford Cars > Ford Cars and PAG Vehicles > Ford Fusion | Mercury Milan | Lincoln Zephyr | Lincoln MKZ



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 17:21.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.