SpamTrapSeeSig wrote:
> In article <dirlrh$ftv$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>, Ian
> <p.nis@NOSPAMvirgin.net> writes
>> What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>
> Frightening.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Simonm.
I had mine up to 70+ once, never again, too much concentration required. 50
to 60 is much better, don't have to worry about overtaking, and even
following caravans is OK. Stress free motoring.
> What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>
>
Not sure if this is any help. but I used to get the IIa 2.25na up to H flat
out, or P if I was going downhill.
"Ian" <p.nis@NOSPAMvirgin.net> wrote in message
news:dirlrh$ftv$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
> What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>
I'll have a look behind the sunvisor tomorrow. I did once work out the
ratios for each gear and stored the results behind there. This was only
about 18 years ago so I expect the paper will still be there in the morning.
ISTR that third gear was exactly correct for the speedo such that it pulled
2000 at 20mph, 3000 at 30mph and 4000 at 40.
As far as practical limits, then 70 is possible but a practical maximum is
about 60.
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:38:27 +0100, "Ian" <p.nis@NOSPAMvirgin.net>
wrote:
>What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>
I had mine to a steady 80 once, but the exhaust was broken (clean
break by the gearbox) so that might have something to do with it.
I think 60 is more relaistic.
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:20:52 +0100, MVP <mr.nice@*nospam*softhome.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:38:27 +0100, "Ian" <p.nis@NOSPAMvirgin.net>
>wrote:
>
>>What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>>
>I had mine to a steady 80 once, but the exhaust was broken (clean
>break by the gearbox) so that might have something to do with it.
>I think 60 is more relaistic.
Driving my landy around with a broken exhaust (below the passenger
seat) - made it very slow and loud.
For a while i had an exhaust that was about 4 foot of pipe with an old
cherry bomb on the end. This gave me lots of power when pulling off,
but top speed was worse.
"Huw" <hedydd[nospam]@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3rdjqjFiv62sU1@individual.net...
>
> "Ian" <p.nis@NOSPAMvirgin.net> wrote in message
> news:dirlrh$ftv$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
>> What top speed can I expect from a 1984 2.5 NA 110?
>>
>
> I'll have a look behind the sunvisor tomorrow. I did once work out the
> ratios for each gear and stored the results behind there. This was only
> about 18 years ago so I expect the paper will still be there in the
> morning.
> ISTR that third gear was exactly correct for the speedo such that it
> pulled 2000 at 20mph, 3000 at 30mph and 4000 at 40.
>
Yep, still there. The speed at 4000erpm, which is where maximum power is
rated is third 40mph, fourth 60mph and fifth 70mph.
That is if you want to run the engine virtually to the governor.
80mph in a standard NA diesel is wishful thinking. The thing would go 'bang'
in short order.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.