On or around Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:21:43 +0000, Fred Labrosse <firstname.lastname@example.org>
enlightened us thusly:
>Austin Shackles wrote:
>> There's a good argument in favour of using the original spec cheap dampers
>> (most are Armstrong) which cost something silly like 10 quid a piece or
>> less, and replacing them fairly often.
>Where did you see that kind of price? Or is it different for 90s and 110s?
>I'm currently looking at some for a 110 and the cheapest I found was around
>20 for rear and 23 for front (inc vat). Yes, Armstrongs.
Paddocks, normally. Not looked at 90/110 ones, I have to admit, recently. I
was talking about disco ones.
Paddock have early ones (up to WA159806) for 8.10, 90/110 front, ditto
rears. Not sure what the difference is on later ones after XA159807 -
bugger all, probably :-)
Beamends have early ones at 14.33 inc vat, later ones a few quid more -
cheaper than Paddock on the later ones, looks like.
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net
my opinions are just that
Soon shall thy arm, unconquered steam! afar Drag the slow barge, or
drive the rapid car; Or on wide-waving wings expanded bear the
flying chariot through the field of air.- Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802)